The correlation of social capital, social trust and population’ entrepreneurial activity in the Arctic region (a case study of the Arkhangelsk oblast)
Автор: Maksimov Anton M., Malinina Kristina O., Blynskaya Tatyana A.
Журнал: Arctic and North @arctic-and-north
Рубрика: Social and economic development
Статья в выпуске: 40, 2020 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The article considers the relationship of social capital, institutional and interpersonal trust, and entrepreneurial activity on the data of the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The authors, following R. Putnam, analytically distinguish two types of social capital - bonding and bridging. The level of the former is measured by interpersonal trust indices, while the latter is measured by general and institutional trust indices. Based on the analysis of the sociological survey results, conducted by the authors of the article, it is shown that the level of bonding capital, based on trust in the nearest social environment, is quite high in the Arkhangelsk Oblast, but there is a shortage of bridging capital that based on trust in public institutions and civil solidarity. It is shown that the deficit of bridging social capital, associated with a low level of trust in institutions, increases the transaction costs of market agents like entrepreneurs, which negatively affects the implementation of the region's entrepreneurial potential. Thus, it is proved that the amount of social capital is a key non-economic factor that reduces the investment rating and entrepreneurial activity indicators in the region against the backdrop of low dynamics of gross regional product and population incomes and increasing government spending to stimulate small and medium-sized businesses.
Social capital, institutional trust, entrepreneurial activity, investment attractiveness of the region, bonding capital, bridging capital
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148318377
IDR: 148318377 | DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.40.66
Список литературы The correlation of social capital, social trust and population’ entrepreneurial activity in the Arctic region (a case study of the Arkhangelsk oblast)
- Myshlyaeva T.V. Doverie v sovremennom obshchestve: podkhody k analizu [The Trust in the Con-temporary Society: Approaches to Analysis]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Loba-chevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial'nye nauki [The Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N.I. Lobachevskiy. Series: Social Sciences], 2006, no. 1, pp. 301–307.
- Polishchuk E.A. Sotsial'nyy kapital i ego rol' v ekonomicheskom razvitii [Social Capital and Its Role in Economic Development]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 5 [St. Petersburg Uni-versity Journal of Economic Studies], 2005, vol. 5, iss. 1, pp. 10–16.
- Milgrom P., Roberts Dzh. Ekonomika, organizatsiya i menedzhment: v 2-h tomah. T. 1 [Economics, Organization and Management. Vol. 1]. Saint Petersburg, Ekonomicheskaya Shkola Publ, 2004. 468 p. (In Russ.)
- North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. 1990. 160 p.
- Bourdieu P. The Forms of Capital. In: Richardson. J., ed., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1986, pp. 241–258.
- Putnam R.D. Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 1995, no. 6 (1), pp. 65–78.
- Blok M., Golovin N.A. Sotsial'nyy kapital: k obobshcheniyu ponyatiya [Social Capital: to a Generaliza-tion of the Concept]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Teoriya, metodologiya i istoriya sotsiologii [The Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg University. Theory, Methodology and History of So-ciology], 2015, vol. 12, iss. 4, pp. 99–111.
- Putnam R.D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, Simon & Schuster, 2000. 541 p.
- Portes A., Vickstrom E. Diversity, Social Capital, and Cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 2011, vol. 37, pp. 461–479.
- Gudkov L. «Doverie» v Rossii: smysl, funktsii, struktura [«Trust» in Russia: Meaning, Functions, Structure]. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya [The Bulletin of Public Opinion], 2012, no. 2, pp. 8–47.