The impact of philosophical thought on innovation
Автор: Al Rajhi I.S.R.
Журнал: Вестник Российского нового университета. Серия: Человек и общество @vestnik-rosnou-human-and-society
Рубрика: Экономические науки
Статья в выпуске: 1, 2024 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Th is paper seeks to unravel the intricate relationship between philosophy and innovation. By tracing the historical journey from ancient Greece to the 21st century, the paper highlights the pivotal contributions of philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Bacon, Descartes, Marx, Rawls, and Habermas. Emphasizing the key philosophical concepts such as knowledge, creativity, and ethics, the study explores practical applications of philosophical methods in fostering innovation. Th e evolving connection between philosophy and innovation is scrutinized, anticipating future developments and proposing practical guidelines for ethical innovation. Th e objective is to provide concise and valuable insights for scientists, practitioners, and policymakers in these interrelated areas.
Philosophy, innovation, knowledge, creativity, ethics, ethical innovation
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148328295
IDR: 148328295 | DOI: 10.18137/RNU.V9276.24.01.P.132
Список литературы The impact of philosophical thought on innovation
- Browne M.N., Keeley S.M. (2015). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking. Pearson. 193 p. ISBN 9781292068718.
- Ennis R.H. (1996). Critical thinking: A conceptual fr amework for Critical thinking. Prentice Hall. 407 p. ISBN 0133747115.
- Paul R.W., Elder L. (2006). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning. Prentice Hall. 514 p. ISBN 0131149628.
- Th e Scientifi c Revolution and the Enlightenment (1500–1780). Pp. 75–86 URL: https://www.tamaqua.k12.pa.us/cms/lib07/PA01000119/Centricity/Domain/119/Th eScientifi c Revolution.pdf (accessed 29.10.2023).
- Moor J.H. (2006). Th e Nature, Importance, and Diffi culty of Machine Ethics. IEEE Intelligent Systems. Vol. 21. No. 4. Pp. 18–21, July-Aug. 2006, DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2006.80
- Rescher N. (2001). Philosophical reasoning: A Study in the Methodology of Philosophizing. Wiley. 296 p. ISBN 0631230181.
- Sorensen R. (1992). Th ought Experiments. Oxford University Press. 318 p. ISBN 019512913X.
- Johnson S. (2010) Where Good Ideas Come fr om: Th e Natural History of Innovation. New York: Reaverhead Books. 326 p. URL: htt ps://thezeitgeistmovement.se/fi les/Books/ Where_goog_ideas_come_from.pdf (accessed 29.10.2023).
- Franssen M., Lokhorst G.-J., van de Poel I. (2018) Philosophy of Technology. In: Zalta E.N. (Ed) Th e Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Th e Metaphysics Research Lab. URL: htt ps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/technology/ (accessed 29.10.2023).
- Carrier M., Massey G.J., Ruetsche L. (Eds.) (2000). Science at Century’s End: Philosophical Questions on the Progress and Limits of Science. University of Pitt sburgh Press. 400 p. DOI: htt ps://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt 5vkgxg
- Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics. 8th edition. Oxford University Press. 512 p. ISBN 0190640871.
- Johnson D.G. (2001). Computer Ethics. Prentice Hall. 240 p. ISBN 0130836990.
- Freeman R.E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press. 276 p. ISBN 0521151740.
- Welfel E.R. (2015). Ethics in Counseling and Psychotherapy: Standards, Research, and Emerging Issues. Cengage Learning. 624 p. ISBN 1305687833.
- Bovens M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal. Vol. 13. No. 4. Pp. 447–468. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
- Brown J.R. (2015). Th ought Experiments. In: Zalta E.N., Nodelman U. (Eds). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: htt ps://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/thought-experiment (accessed 29.10.2023).
- Searle J.R. (1980). Minds, Brains, and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol. 3. No. 3. Pp. 417–457. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00005756
- Jackson F. (1986). What Mary didn’t know. Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 83. No. 5. Pp. 291–295. DOI: htt ps://doi.org/10.2307/2026143
- Foot P. (1967). Th e problem of abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Eff ect. Th e Oxford Review. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 5–15. URL: htt ps://sites.pitt .edu/~mthompso/readings/foot.pdf (accessed 29.10.2023).
- Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review. Vol. 47. No. 10. Pp. 777–780. URL: htt ps://journals.aps.org/pr/pdf/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 (accessed 29.10.2023).
- Th omson J.J. (1985). Th e Trolley Problem. Th e Yale Review of Law and Social Action. Vol. 94. No. 6. Pp. 1395–1415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/796133
