The impact of the new model of nuclear industry diversification on the development of the territories of presence (theoretical and practical aspects)

Автор: Faikov Dmitriy Yu., Baydarov Dmitry Yu.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Статья в выпуске: 3 т.14, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The state has set a task to expand the production of high-tech civilian products for the enterprises of the military-industrial complex. Many defense enterprises are located in single-industry towns, which makes it relevant to analyze the mutual influence of the diversification of city-forming enterprises and cities' development. The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of the new model of diversification on the development of the territories of presence in the context of the nuclear industry. The research methodology is based on the principles of system analysis and institutional economic theory. The authors use the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, and logical modeling. The basis is the theory of the social contract. The research proposes a three-level model of the social contract, detailing the interaction of an individual with three levels of public power - federal, regional, and local. The feature of the municipal part of the social contract for single-industry towns is highlighted: its third party is the cityforming enterprise that creates a number of basic benefits. In single-industry towns, where the nuclear industry enterprises are the main city-forming enterprises, the municipal part of the social contract changes: a state corporation becomes one of the contract parties instead of a city-forming enterprise. This is due to the introduction of a new model of diversification of the state corporation's activities. The authors prove that changing the social contract can give the cities of presence new qualified jobs, and state corporations can help to form a personnel reserve, fulfill the goals in the field of defense production diversification and the creation of new high-tech businesses. Testing the modified model of the social contract on the example of closed administrative-territorial entities of the nuclear industry revealed local governments' and the population's interest in it, the possibility of cities' long-term sustainable development, including improving the comfort of living. The results of the study can be used to develop strategic documents for spatial development, programs for single-industry towns' development, city-forming enterprises and holdings in various industries.

Еще

Social contract, single-industry town, closed administrative-territorial formation, city-forming enterprise, diversification of the military-industrial complex, state corporation rosatom

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147235407

IDR: 147235407 | DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.3.75.8

Список литературы The impact of the new model of nuclear industry diversification on the development of the territories of presence (theoretical and practical aspects)

Lynn III W. The end of the military-industrial complex. How the Pentagon is adapting to globalization. Foreign Affairs, 2014, no. 93, pp. 104–110.
Matelly S., Lima M. The influence of the state on the strategic choices of defense companies: The cases of Germany, France and the UK after the Cold War. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2016, vol. 2, no. 20, pp. 61–88.
Scherbakova L.I. Institute of local self-government in transforming Russian society. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya=Socio-Humanitarian Knowledge, 2012, no. 7, pp. 374–380 (in Russian).
Surtseva A.A. Regional social contract practice between business and authorities (case study of the Kemerovo Oblast). Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovanii=Journal of Institutional Studies, 2011, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 94–102 (in Russian).
Shafik N. A new social contract. Finance & Development, 2018, vol. 0055, iss. 004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484386194.022
Snyder M., Gupta A. The social contract for AI. Computers and Society, 2020. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08140 (accessed: May 11, 2021).
Auzan A.A. On the possibility of transition to an economic strategy based on the specifics of human capital in Russia. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii=The Journal of the New Economic Association, 2015, no. 2, pp. 243–248 (in Russian).
Ivanova M.V. Tendencies and features of development of Russian monotowns and their competitive recovery. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki=Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences, 2018, no. 1, pp. 86–91. DOI: 10.21603/2500-3372-2018-1-86-91 (in Russian).
Proskurnin S.D. Basic premises and trends CATF GK «Rosatom». Regional'naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal=Regional Economics and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal, 2019, no. 1 (57), pp. 1–27 (in Russian).
Animitsa E.G., Kuznetsov V.N., Ergunova O.T. Creation of the territories of the advancing social and economic development in borders of the closed administrative territorial formations of Sverdlovsk region. Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya=Advances in Modern Science and Education, 2016, no. 12, vol. 4, pp. 92–95 (in Russian).
Peshina E.V., Animitsa E.G., Bochko V.S., Animitsa P.E. Kontseptual'nye podkhody k razrabotke strategii razvitiya monoprofil'nogo goroda [Conceptual Approaches to Developing a Strategy for the Development of a Single-Industry City]. Ed. by A.I. Tatarkin, M.V. Fedorov. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGEU, 2010. 81 p.
Shastitko A.E., Fatikhova A.F. Company towns in Russia: Some thoughts on development alternatives. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik=E-journal. Public Administration, 2019, no. 76, pp. 109–135. DOI: 10.24411/2070-1381-2019-10006 (in Russian).
Bukhvald E.M. Mono-company towns within the strategic planning system in Russia. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya=Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2017, no. 12, pp. 75–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2017.12.16 (in Russian).
Vakhtina M.A., Ignatova T.V. Institutional limitations on the way of complex development of Russian single-industry towns. Vestnik Akademii znanii=Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, 2020, no. 36 (1), pp. 43–47. DOI: 10.24411/2304-6139-2020-00008 (in Russian).
Razvitie monogorodov Rossii: monografiya [Russian Monotowns Development: Monograph]. Team of authors. Ed. by Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor I.N. Il'ina. Moscow: Financial University, 2013. 168 p.
Kolesnik E.A. Threats and risks of diversification of economy of mono-industrial towns. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta=Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2018, no. 3 (413), economic sciences, iss. 60, pp. 47–52 (in Russian).
O’Hagan S., Cecil B. A macro-level approach to examining Canada’s primary industry towns in a knowledge economy. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 2007, no. 2, рр. 18–43. Available at: https://journals.brandonu.ca/jrcd/article/view/84/31
Bole D., Kozina J., Tiran J. The variety of industrial towns in Slovenia: A typology of their economic performance. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 2019, vol. 46, iss. 46, рр. 71–83. DOI:10.2478/bog-2019-0035
Trapeznikova I.S. The modern model of Russian business social responsibility in the context of skilled labor force formation at the territory of presence. Ekonomika truda=Russian Journal of Labour Economics, 2019, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 689–698. DOI: 10.18334/et.6.2.39794 (in Russian).
Lazarenko V.A. Corporate social responsibility of large business in Russia. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seria 5, Geografia=Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5, Geography, 2018, no. 1, pp. 66–72 (in Russian).
Korzhevskaya A.A. Interaction between authorities and corporate structures is one of the models of innovative regional development. In: Ural – XXI vek: region innovatsionnogo razvitiya: materialy II Mezhdunar. nauchno-praktich. konf. [Ural – XXI century: A region of innovative development: Proceedings of the 2nd international research-to-practice conference]. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGEU, 2017. Pp. 119–122 (in Russian).
Zemtsov S.P., Chernov A.V. What high-tech companies in Russia grow faster and why? Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii=The Journal of the New Economic Association, 2019, no. 1 (41), pp. 68–99. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2019-41-1-3 (in Russian).
Kuznetsov N.V., Kotova N.E. Using the institute of public corporations for ensure economic growth. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya=Fundamental Research, 2020, no. 8, pp. 40–44 (in Russian).
Mailyan S.S. On some aspects of the economic nature of state-owned corporations. Vestnik ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti=Vestnik of Economic Security, 2019, no. 4, pp. 314–317. DOI: 10.24411/2414-3995-2019-10264 (in Russian).
Çağlar K., Bitzinger R. Defense industries in the 21st century: A comparative analysis – The second e-workshop. Comparative Strategy, 2018, vol. 37, iss., 4, pp. 255–259. DOI: 10.1080/01495933.2018.1497318
Ivanter V.V., Semikashev V.V. Nuclear industry role in national economy and challenges it faces. Energeticheskaya politika=The Energy Policy, 2017, no. 3, pp. 3–11 (in Russian).
Faikov D.Yu., Baydarov D.Yu. Diversification of production in the nuclear industry. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii=The Economic Revival of Russia, 2020, no. 3, pp. 96–109. DOI: 10.37930/1990-9780-2020-3-65-96-109 (in Russian).
Rozmirovich S.D., Manchenko E.V., Mekhanik A.G., Liss A.V. Diversifikatsiya OPK: kak pobezhdat' na grazhdanskikh rynkakh: doklad Ekspertnogo soveta Predsedatelya kollegii Voenno-promyshlennoi komissii RF dlya V Mezhdunar. Foruma tekhnol. razvitiya «Tekhnoprom» [Diversification of the defense industry: How to win in civilian markets: Report of the Chairman of the Expert Council of the Collegium of the Military-Industrial Commission of the Russian Federation]. Novosibirsk, 2017. Available at: http://www.instrategy.ru/pdf/367.pdf (accessed: December 21, 2020).
Chernyatin D.M., Belyakova G.Ya. Peculiarities of restructuring of non-core departments of enterprises of the ZATO of the state-corporation “Rosatom”. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo=Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series Economics and Law, 2019, no. 1, pp. 46–53 (in Russian).
Faikov D.Yu., Baydarov D.Yu. New trends in the development of closed administrative-territorial entities (for example, the nuclear industry CATF). Kontury globalʹnyh transformacij: politika, ekonomika, pravo=Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, 2014, no. 6, pp. 120–131 (in Russian).
Faikov D.Yu. Zakrytye administrativno-territorial'nye obrazovaniya. Sistemnye transformatsii [Closed Administrative-Territorial Entities. System Transformations]. Sarov: FGUP «RFYaTs-VNIIEF», 2012. 394 p. Available at: http://book.sarov.ru/product/zato/ (accessed: November 20, 2020).
Salvesen D., Renski H. The Importance of Quality of Life in the Location Decisions of New Economy Firms. Report 99–07–13815. Chapel Hill: Center for Urban and Regional Studies, 2003. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Salvesen/publication/228494438_The_importance_of_quality_of_life_in_the_location_decisions_of_new_economy_firms/links/55ad37d408aed9b7dcdad66d/The-importance-of-quality-of-life-in-the-location-decisions-of-new-economy-firms.pdf
Bajpai N., Prasad A., Pandey P. Work life balance retention (WLBR) model – a weapon to retain hi-tech employees. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 2013, vol. 2, iss. 12, рр. 92–102. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2715356

Еще

Статья научная