The matrix of cognitive filters as a tool for the analysis of linguocreatemes in modern English discourse

Бесплатный доступ

This study is devoted to the development of the author's method “The Matrix of Cognitive Filters” (MCF). It is used to model the process of inferring the meaning of creative elements (linguocreatemes) in multimodal online discourse. To accomplish this task, key cognitive mechanisms for generating the meaning of linguocreatemes were identified and researched. These are banner blindness, evaluative categorization and conceptualization, (de)compression of information and profiling, conceptual metaphor, conceptual metaphtonymy, and conceptual integration. Monomodal verbal and multimodal linguocreatemes (more than 18,000 units) were selected with a continuous sampling method from English-language Internet resources, visual and verbal corpora. Theoretical analysis showed that the MCF can be used to model the overall ability of a linguocreateme to initiate cognitive resonance in a recipient. This method also allows for the collection of data on the probabilistic prediction of the level of cognitive resonance and positive or negative dissonance in an addressee. The empirical data obtained during a practical linguistic-cognitive experiment among English-speaking respondents from across countries confirmed the theoretical results of the study. The participants had to infer the general meanings of several multimodal linguocreatemes in accordance with the MCF. The experiment confirmed the feasibility of using this method to assess the occurrence of cognitive resonance, positive or negative dissonance, as well as obtaining additional data on the recipient's reactions to different linguocreatemes in English online discourse.

Еще

Matrix of cognitive filters, linguocreateme, cognitive mechanism, categorization, metaphor, metaphtonymy, integration

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149147492

IDR: 149147492   |   DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2024.5.15

Список литературы The matrix of cognitive filters as a tool for the analysis of linguocreatemes in modern English discourse

  • Boldyrev N.N., 2020. The Interpretive Dominant in the Cognitive Theory of Language. EpSBS European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Proceedings of the Philological Readings, PhR 2019. London, s.n., pp. 1-8.
  • Fauconnier G., 1985. Mental Spaces Text. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press. 258 p.
  • Festinger L., 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, Stanford University Press. 291 p.
  • Forceville C., 2009. Non-Verbal and Multimodal Metaphor in a Cognitivist Framework: Agendas for Research. Forceville C., Urios-Aparisi E., eds. Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin, New York, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 19-42.
  • Gapanyuk Yu.E., Terekhov V.I., Ivlev V.Y., Kaganov Yu.T., Karabulatova I.S., Oseledchik M.B., Semenov D.V., 2024. Principles of Creating Hybrid Intelligent Information Systems Based on the Granular-Metagraph Approach. Samsonovich A.V., Liu T., eds. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2023, Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the BICA Society. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 1130. Cham, Springer Nature, pp. 356-366. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-50381-8_37
  • Golubkova E., Taymour M., 2021. Mixed Multimodal Metaphors in Advertising in English. Kolmakova O., Boginskaya O., Grichin S., eds. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. European Publisher, pp. 618-625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.12.76
  • Grady J.Е., 1997. Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. Dr. Philosophy in Linguistics diss. Berkeley.
  • Gridina T.A., 1996. Language Game: Stereotype and Creativity. Yekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University. 225 p.
  • Gurevich L.S., 2022. Expressive Speech Acts in Political Discourse: An Integrative Approach Perspective. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences. Mokslines Leidybos Deimantas, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 18-32. DOI: 10.33422/jarss.v5i2.783
  • Karabulatova I.S., Lagutkina M.D., Borodina N.V., Streltsova M.A., Bakhus A.O., 2021. Formation of Ethnosocial Identity in the Matrix of Media Discourse. Amazonia Investiga, vol. 10, no. 43, pp. 224-234.
  • Lakoff G., Johnson M., 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 276 p.
  • Taymour M.P., 2022. Linguistic Creativity: Cognitive Dissonance vs Cognitive Resonance. Linguistic Existence of Human Being and Ethnos, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences RAS. Moscow, Rusayns Publ., pp. 135-140.
  • Taymour M.P., 2023. Linguistic Creativity in Modern Multimodal Microtexts in English. Vol. 1. Moscow, RuScience Publ. 128 p.
  • Zhang L., Karabulatova I., Nurmukhametov A., Lagutkina M., 2023. Association Strategies of
  • Speech Behavior of Communicators in Coding Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Approach Towards Understanding the Role of Cognitive and Linguistic Processes in Communication. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1571-1587. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-023-09966-z
Еще
Статья научная