The model of technology of university engineering students’ foreign language training in conditions of multilingual education in Kazakhstan

Автор: Shaikhyzada Zhanar G., Kostina Ekaterina A., Zatyneyko Anatoly M., Kubeyeva Aissulu E., Zhetpisbayeva Bakhytgul A.

Журнал: Science for Education Today @sciforedu

Рубрика: Педагогические и психологические науки

Статья в выпуске: 4 (32), 2016 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Nowadays foreign language education is considered to be an essential component of higher vocational education since during the introduction of Kazakhstan’s higher educational establishments in the Bologna process, which implies the academic and professional recognition of the country’s diplomas in European countries, a high level of foreign language proficiency is necessary for experts of any profile. In particular, this statement is of great importance in the field of training engineering specialists in Kazakhstan connected with the necessity of international accreditation of educational programs in the field of engineering and technologies and the possibility for engineering professionals to receive the rank of "Euro engineer". The demand to train engineers in compliance with the European standards of engineering education foregrounds for Kazakhstan’s universities issues concerning purposeful and continuous foreign languages teaching which has to be aimed at the formation of students’ foreign language communicative competency. The solution of these issues calls for a new conceptual approach to engineering students’ foreign language training within higher vocational education which would provide with the most optimal way of achieving the stated goal. In this regard, the article authors address to the question of using pedagogical technologies in the process of foreign languages teaching and learning which enable to set up precise goals, plan the expected outcome and focus the whole activity on its achievement. In the article the authors introduce the new concept "technology of university engineering students’ foreign language training" and provide insight into it. They also present the model of this technology which includes such interrelated components as the goal and outcomes of foreign languages teaching, content-related, organizational-procedural and monitoring-assessment components. The presented model suggests the modernization of the process of foreign language teaching, the selection of the language learning content and the putting of the national assessment system in conformity with the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS). Thus, through the relative determination and organization of each structural component of its model, the technology of university engineering students’ foreign language training condition facilitates the achievement of the main goal of teaching foreign languages in higher schools - the formation of students’ foreign language communicative competency.

Еще

Technology, higher engineering education, euroengineer, foreign language education, foreign language training, foreign language communicative competency, pedagogical technology, model, content of foreign language learning

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147137750

IDR: 147137750   |   DOI: 10.15293/2226-3365.1604.09

Список литературы The model of technology of university engineering students’ foreign language training in conditions of multilingual education in Kazakhstan

  • Смиронов С. В. Технологии в образовании//Высшее образование в России. -1999. -№ 1. -С. 109-112.
  • Dooley K. E. Towards a holistic model for the discussion of education technologies//Journal of Educational Technology and Society. -1996. -Vol. 2, № 4. -P. 35-45.
  • Bloom B. S., Engelhart M. D. Furst E. J., Hill W. H., Krathwohl D. R. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. -New York: Longmans and Green, 1956. -111 p
  • Luppicini R. A Systems Definition of Educational Technology in Society//Educational Technology & Society. -2005. -Vol. 8, № 3. -P. 103-109.
  • Sakamoto Т. The Roles of Educational Technology in Curriculum Development. Curriculum Development by Means of Educational Technology. -Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD, 1974. -218 p.
  • Lefevre D., Cox B. Feedback in technology-based instruction: Learner preferences//British Journal of Educational Technology. -2016. -Vol. 47, № 2. -P. 248-256.
  • Hlynka D., Jacobsen M. What is educational technology, anyway? A commentary on the new AECT definition of the field//Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. -2010. -Vol. 35, № 2. -URL: http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/527/260 (accessed 15.06.2016)
  • Yau H. K., Cheng Lai Fong A., Ho W. M. Identify the Motivational Factors to Affect the Higher Education Students to Learn Using Technology//The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. -2015. -Vol. 14, № 2. -P. 89-100.
  • Jang S.-J., Chang Y. Exploring the technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) of Taiwanese university physics instructors//Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. -2016. -Vol. 32, № 1. -P. 107-122.
  • Hsin C. T., Li M. C., Tsai C. C. The Influence of Young Children’s Use of Technology on Their Learning: A Review//Educational Technology & Society. -2014. -Vol. 17, № 4. -P. 85-99.
  • Селевко Г. К. Современные образовательные технологии. -М.: Народное образование, 1998. -256 с.
  • Беспалько В. П. Компоненты педагогической технологии. -М.: Педагогика, 1989. -192 с.
  • Лаврентьев Г. В., Лаврентьева Н. Б. Инновационные обучающие технологии в профессиональной подготовке специалистов. -Барнаул: Изд-во Алтайского государственного университета, 2012. -146 с.
  • Кларин M. В. Педагогическая технология в учебном процессе. -М.: Знание, 1989. -80 с.
  • Монахов В. M. Технологическая карта -паспорт проектируемого учебного процесса. -Новокузнецк: Изд-во НИПК, 1996. -208 с.
  • Кузнецова Н. Е. Педагогические технологии в предметном обучении. -СПб.: Образование, 1995. -68 с.
  • Буланова-Топоркова M. В. Педагогика и психология высшей школы. -Ростов-н/Д: Феникс, 2002. -544 с.
  • Anderson L. W., Krathwohl D. R. A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. -New York: Longman, 2001. -208 p.
  • Загвязинский В. И. Методология и методы психолого-педагогического исследования. -М.: Академия, 2001. -190 с.
  • Введенский Б. Н. Моделирование профессиональных компетенций педагога//Педагогика. -2003. -№ 10. -С. 51-58.
  • Zhetpisbayeva B. A., Shaikhyzada Zh. G.,Syrymbetova L. S. The conceptual model of continuous multilingual education//Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research. -2012. -Vol. 17, № 10. -P. 1503-1507.
  • The Concept of Foreign Language Education. Almaty, Abylay Khan Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages, 2006, 20 p.
  • ENAEE Mission. General Policy Statement. Brussels, ENAEE, 2009, 12р.
  • Howe A., Romiszwoski A.J. International Yearbook on Technology of Education and Training, 1978/79. London, Kogan Page, 1978, 764p.
  • The Encyclopedia of Educational Media Communications and Technologies. London, 1978, 745 p.
  • New Trends in the Utilization of Educational Technology for Science Education. Belgium, the UNESCO Press, 1974, 242 p.
  • Educational Technology: A Glossary of Terms. Washington, DC, AECT, 1979, 169 p.
  • Januszewski A., Molenda M. Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary. New York, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008, 369 p.
Еще
Статья научная