The phenomenon of strategic advantages in the 21st century

Автор: Balatsky E.V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Public administration

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.17, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article investigates issues concerning the development of countries amid geopolitical turbulence. In particular, it is shown that the development of the world economic system has two phases: monocentricity, with a leader country and the world order it has established; and multipolarity with an increasing chaos and the struggle of many countries for the reconstruction of the world. These processes are based on scale effect, which at the stage of multipolarity operates in the external sphere in the form of territorial expansion, and at the stage of monocentricity - in the internal sphere in the form of technological innovations within the corporate sector of individual countries. The paper considers the restoration of the phenomenon of strategic advantages, which barely manifested itself in the geopolitical space for a long time. To explain the cyclical rising of this effect, we introduce the concepts of independent (natural) and controlled (artificial) development instead of the concepts of outstripping development and catching-up development that are fading into the background; we show that artificial development exists in the form of acceleration and containment. This made it possible to put forward a political model of sovereignty “leader - satellites/opponents - neutral zone” instead of I. Wallerstein’s technological model “core - semi-periphery - periphery”. We propose and substantiate a quantitative criterion for strategic advantages, according to which they are observed under multiple differences (twofold or more) in the economic indicators of the compared countries. The framework study uses five indicators: area, GDP, population, technology level (GDP per capita), availability of nuclear weapons; the first four parameters are assessed quantitatively with the help of strategic advantages index; the fifth parameter is assessed qualitatively. We consider examples of the phenomenon of strategic advantages for bilateral relations: Azerbaijan/Armenia; Russia/Ukraine; South Korea/North Korea; India/Pakistan, etc. We also reveal the significance of this effect for Russia’s long-term foreign policy strategy.

Еще

Geopolitical turbulence, economies of scale, phenomenon of strategic advantages, bilateral relations, potential

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147245869

IDR: 147245869   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.4.94.2

Список литературы The phenomenon of strategic advantages in the 21st century

  • Arrighi G. (2006). Dolgii dvadtsatyi vek: Den'gi, vlast' i istoki nashego vremeni [The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times]. Moscow: Territoriya budushchego.
  • Arrighi G. (2009). Afterword to the second edition of the “Long Twentieth Century”. Prognozis, 1(17), 34–50 (in Russian).
  • Balatsky E.V. (2018). Russia’s damage from international sanctions: Rethinking the facts. Mir novoi ekonomiki=The World of New Economy, 12(3), 36–45 (in Russian).
  • Balatsky E.V. (2022). Russia in the epicenter of geopolitical turbulence: Signs of eventual domination. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(5), 33–54.
  • Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. (2023). Identifying regional foci of potential geopolitical activity on the basis of demographic scale effect. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(5), 138–154.
  • Balatsky E.V., Gusev A.B., Yurevich M.A. (2016). Makrootsenka resursnoi zavisimosti rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Macro-Assessment of the Resource Dependence of the Russian Economy]. Moscow: Pero.
  • Belova L.G. (2019). Features of innovative development of small advanced countries of the Asia-Pacific region – Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore. Rossiya i Aziya=Russia and Asia, 7(2), 31–45 (in Russian).
  • Engel J.H. (1954). A verification of Lanchester’s law. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2(2), 163–171.
  • Evstigneeva L.P., Evstigneev R.N. (2012). Dogonyayushchee razvitie: sovremennaya traktovka [Catching-Up Development: A Modern Interpretation]. Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN.
  • Evstigneeva L.P., Evstigneev R.N. (2013). The mystery of catch-up development. Voprosy ekonomiki, 1, 81–96 (in Russian).
  • Gromova M.A. (2019). Sources of company’s competitive advantages: Outlook of strategy schools. Nauka i tekhnika=Science & Technique, 18(1), 82–88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2019-18-1-82-88 (in Russian).
  • Gubaidullina F.S. (2016). Transformation of the economic model of Japan. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya, 10(4), 74–89 (in Russian).
  • Krasilshchikov V.A. (2003). Asian Tigers and Russia: Is bureaucratic capitalism scary? Mir Rossii=Universe of Russia, 4, 3–43 (in Russian).
  • Krasilshchikov V.A. (2020). Is it possible to repeat the experience of East Asia? The external factors of East Asian ‘miracle’. Kontury global'nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, parvo=Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 13(3), 7–26 (in Russian).
  • Kuznetsov A.V. (2018). Integration processes in the Asia-Pacific Region with the participation of China and the position of Russia. Finansy: teoriya i praktika=Finance: Theory and Practice, 22(5), 95–105 (in Russian).
  • Lanchester F.W. (1916). Aircraft in Warfare; the Dawn of the Fourth Arm. London: Constable and Company.
  • Levin S.N., Sablin K.S. (2021). Catch-up development vs. forward-looking development: From theoretical models to developmental state practices. Voprosy regulirovaniya ekonomiki=Journal of Economic Regulation, 12(4), 60–70 (in Russian).
  • Liker J. (2005). Dao Toyota: 14 printsipov menedzhmenta vedushchei kompanii mira [The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer]. Moscow: Al'pina Biznes Buks.
  • Novikov I.A., Likhareva N.D. (2020). Geographical orientation of exports: Looking beyond the gravity model (on the example of four “Asian Тigers”). Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskii region: ekonomika, politika, parvo=PACIFIC RIM: Economics, Politics, Law, 3, 33–50 (in Russian).
  • Petukhov V.A. (2023). “Asian Tigers”: Experience of economic success. Upravlencheskii uchet=Management Accounting, 11, 126–136 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2023). Catching-up development under sanctions: The strategy of positive collaboration. Terra Economicus, 21(3), 6–16 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M., Popov V.V. (2006). Evolutionary theory of economic policy. Part I: The experience of fast development. Voprosy ekonomiki, 7, 4–23 (in Russian).
  • Porter M. (2016). Konkurentnaya strategiya: metodika analiza otraslei i konkurentov [Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors]. Moscow: Al'pina Pablisher.
  • Ragheb M. (2015). Lanchester law, shock and awe strategies. Journal of Defense Management, 6(1), 1–3. DOI: 10.4172/2167-0374.1000137
  • Sachs J. (2022). Epokhi globalizatsii: geografiya, tekhnologii i instituty [The Ages of Globalization: Geography, Technology, and Institutions]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Instituta Gaidara.
  • Taran E.A., Zhironkina O.V. (2021). Is endogenous growth possible in the Russian economy in the context of economic convergence? Ekonomika i upravlenie innovatsiyami=Economics and Innovation Management, 18(3), 35–46 (in Russian).
  • Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
  • Turchin P.V. (2024). Konets vremen [End Times]. Moscow: AST.
  • Vyakina I.V. (2021). Improving methods for assessing economic security at the micro level in the context of digitalization. MIR (Modernizatsiia. Innovatsii. Razvitie)=MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research), 12(3), 329–342. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.3.329-342 (in Russian).
  • Wallerstein I. (2006). Mirosistemnyi analiz: Vvedenie [World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction]. Moscow: Territoriya budushchego.
Еще
Статья научная