The potential of tax impact on the economic inequality of citizens in Russia

Автор: Pugachev A.A.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Public finance

Статья в выпуске: 1 т.17, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

In Russia, the possibilities of smoothing inequality through taxes have not been implemented, despite the consistently high inequality, its acute perception by citizens and attention to the problem at the highest level of government. The aim of the study is to determine the possibilities for smoothing the economic inequality of citizens in Russia with the help of tax instruments. The hypothesis of the study is that the set of instruments of income, indirect and property taxation of citizens in Russia has a significant unrealized potential for smoothing economic inequality. To test the hypothesis, we use correlation and regression analysis and decomposition of tax instruments according to areas (income, property and indirect) and explore the dependence of inequality indicators on tax tools used for smoothing inequality. Based on the data from Rosstat, Federal Tax Service, World Bank, OECD, Credit Suisse and the World Inequality Database, a Data Set was formed which includes 2.6 thousand indicators. The calculations were performed using the Data Analysis Toolpak in MS Excel. The relevance of personal income tax deductions was assessed by using sociological survey dat. It was established that the current tax instruments do not help to smooth inequality in Russia, and sometimes, on the contrary, lead to its growth. It seems advisable to smooth inequality within the framework of income taxation by increasing the progression of personal income tax and introducing a tax-free minimum in conjunction with the minimum wage, increasing the share of social tax deductions. In the field of property taxes, it is advisable to increase the tax burden for owners of expensive or many objects of property, and provide the targeting of tax benefits. In terms of indirect taxes, it is expedient to reduce VAT on goods and services that make up the bulk of consumption expenses of the least well-off citizens, for example, housing and communal services, and to increase VAT on items that form the basis of consumption of the rich, for example, the return of the 20% rate on recreation, hotels, cafes and restaurants. The potential of tax administration in smoothing inequality is determined by the possibilities of ensuring the completeness of taxation of current income, capital and consumption of the most affluent citizens.

Еще

Economic inequality, income inequality, wealth inequality, consumption inequality, smoothing, personal income tax, tax deductions, vat, property taxes

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147243326

IDR: 147243326   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.1.91.8

Список литературы The potential of tax impact on the economic inequality of citizens in Russia

  • Auten G., Splinter D. (2023). Income inequality in the United States: Using tax data to measure long-term trends. Journal of Political Economy, 11, 44. Available at: https://doi/epdf/10.1086/728741
  • Belekhova G.V. (2023). The scale of inequality specifics of its perception in modern Russia. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(1), 164–185. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.1.85.9 (in Russian).
  • Blasco J., Guillaud E., Zemmour М. (2020). Consumption taxes and income inequality an international perspective with microsimulation. Luxembourg Income Study Working Papers Series, 785, 1–35.
  • Ciminelli G., Ernst E., Giuliodori M., Meriola R. (2017). The composition effects of tax-based consolidations on income inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, 57(С), 107–124.
  • Dianov S., Koroleva L., Pokrovskaia N. et al. (2022). The influence of taxation on income inequality: Analysis of the practice in the EU countries. Sustainability, 14(15), 9066. DOI: 10.3390/su14159066
  • Goncharenko L.I. et al. (2019). Vliyanie podokhodnogo nalogooblozheniya na sotsial’noe neravenstvo v Rossii [Impact of Income Taxation on Social Inequality in Russia]. Moscow: Knorus.
  • Gromov V.V. (2021). Non-taxable minimum in personal income tax design: Experience and prospects. Nalogi, 2, 3–8. DOI: 10.18572/1999-4796-2021-2-3-8 (in Russian).
  • Guillaud E., Olckers M., Zemmour M. (2017). Four levers of redistribution: The impact of tax and transfer systems on inequality reduction. Luxembourg Income Study Working Papers Series, 695, 1–38. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02735326/document
  • Ilyin V.A. (2017). “Crony capitalism” – a source of social inequality in modern Russia. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 10(6), 9–23. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2017.6.54.1 (in Russian).
  • Kapeliushnikov R.I. (2017). Inequality: How not to primitivize the problem. Voprosy ekonomiki, 4, 117–139. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-4-117-139 (in Russian).
  • Kapeliushnikov R.I. (2019). Is economic inequality a universal evil? Voprosy ekonomiki, 4, 91–106. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2019-4-91-106 (in Russian).
  • Kostyleva L.V. (2011). Taxation as a mechanism for regulating population inequality. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 3(15), 66–77 (in Russian).
  • Kuznets S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
  • Malis N.I. (2023). New tasks of tax policy are aimed at balancing budgets at all levels. Finansy, 7, 15–20 (in Russian).
  • Mareeva S.V. (2018). Social inequalities and the social structure of modern Russia as perceived by the population. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii, 9(3), 101–120. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2018.26.3.527 (in Russian).
  • Mareeva S.V., Slobodenyuk E.D., Anikin V.A. (2022). Public tolerance for social inequalities in turbulent Russia: Reassessing the role of subjective mobility. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 1, 39–60. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2022.1.1982 (in Russian).
  • Martorano B. (2018). Taxation and inequality in developing countries: Lessons from the recent experience of Latin America. Journal of International Development, 30(2), 256–273. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3350
  • Mayburov I.A. (2015). Marking the centenary of income tax in Russia: Theoretical analysis of key stages of the reform. Journal of Tax Reform, 1(2-3), 161–176. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2015.1.2.010 (in Russian).
  • Mayburov I.A. (2023). Nalogovaya politika i tseli ustoichivogo razvitiya. Mirovoi opyt sopryazheniya [Tax Policy and Sustainable Development Goals. World Experience of Interfacing]. Moscow: Yuniti-Dana.
  • Mel’nikova N.P., Tikhonova A.V. (2018). Property tax deductions and fairness of personal income taxation. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet=International Accounting, 21(9), 1100–1112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.21.9.1100 (in Russian).
  • Panskov V.G. (2020). On the new personal income tax rate. Finansy, 8, 25–29 (in Russian).
  • Piketty T., Saez E., Zucman G. (2018). Distributional national accounts: Methods and estimates for the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(2), 586–587.
  • Pinskaya M.R. (2015). Approaches to understanding the tax equality. Journal of Tax Reform, 1(1), 90–99. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2015.1.1.006 (in Russian).
  • Pugachev A.A. (2023). Economic inequality of citizens beyond averages: Assessment in the conditions of its transformation. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(3), 141–158. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.3.87.7 (in Russian).
  • Pugachev A.A. (2023). The impact of indirect taxation on inequality in Russia. Journal of Tax Reform, 9(1), 19–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.1.126
  • Saez E. (2017). Taxing the rich more: Preliminary evidence from the 2013 tax increase. Tax Policy and the Economy, 31(1), 71–120. DOI: 10.1086/691084
  • Shevyakov A.Yu. (2011). Mify i realii sotsial’noi politiki [Myths and Realities of Social Policy]. Moscow: M-Studio.
  • Shmelev Yu.D. (2017). On criteria for assessing the effectiveness and fairness of the state tax policy. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo=Economics, Taxes & Law, 2, 113–120 (in Russian).
  • Vylkova E.S. (2022). Improving the taxation of the property of individuals in the Russian Federation as a tool to reduce social inequality. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo=Economics, Taxes & Law, 15(3), 118–126. DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X 2022-15-3-118-126 (in Russian).
  • Wilkinson B.R., Hageman A.M. (2023). The role of political elites in income tax system design and tax fairness. The British Accounting Review, 55(3), 101172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101172
Еще
Статья научная