The theory of "union-distinction" as a paradigm of Gr. Palamas’ methodology

Бесплатный доступ

The issue concerning the real existence of the divine energies and consequently their relation to the divine essence is remarkably important for Christian Metaphysics. This study deals with the way in which Gr. Palamas included in this perspective the theory on unions and distinctions, which derives from Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite’s works, who is considered to be one of the main founders of Christian theology. It is also important to mention that the study deals with matters that, on the one side, have formed a tradition in the history of Christianity and, on the other, are subsumed in the context of the hesychastic controversy of the fourteenth-century, during which the specification of both the similarities and the differences between philosophy and theology was decisively raised.

Еще

Gregorius palamas, union, distinction, pseudo-dionysius the areopagite

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147103488

IDR: 147103488

Список литературы The theory of "union-distinction" as a paradigm of Gr. Palamas’ methodology

  • Combés, J. (1975) "Damascius Lecteur du Parménide," Archives de Philosophie 38, 33-60.
  • Corsini, E. (1962) Il Trattato de Divinis Nominibus dello Pseudo-Dionigi e i Commenti Neoplatonici al. Parmenide. Torino.
  • Guillard, J. (1938) "Autour du Palamisme," Echos d’ Orient 37, 424-460.
  • Koch, H. (1985) "Proklos als Quelle des Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita in der Lehre vom Bösen", Philologus 54, 438-454.
  • Lossky, Vl. (1930) "La Notion des "Analogies" chez le Pseudo-Denys l’Aréopagite," Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Litteraire du Moyen Age 5, 279-310.
  • Meyendorff, J. (1953) "Les Débuts de la Controverse hésychaste," Byzantion 22, 87-120.
  • Nisiotis, N. (1986) Προλεγόμενα εις την Θεολογικήν Γνωσιολογίαν. Athens: Μήνυμα.
  • Piguet, J.-Claude; Widmer, Gabriel-Ph. (1991) Le renversement sémantique dialogue d’un théologien et d’un philosophe, Lausanne Neuchâtel: Cahiers de la Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie Genève.
  • Podskalsky, G. (1974) "Nicholas von Methone und die Proklorenaissance in Byzanz," Orientalia Christiana Periodica 42, 509-523.
  • Roques, R. (1962) Structures Théologiques. Paris: P.U.F.
  • Saffrey, H. D.; Westerink, L. G. (1978) Proclus: Théologie Platonicienne V. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
  • Schürmann, R. (1982) "L’hénologie comme dépassement de la métaphysique," Les études philosophiques 37, 331-350.
  • Siasou, L. (1984) Εραστές της Αλήθειας. Thessaloniki.
  • Stiglmayr, J. (1895) "Der Neuplatoniker Proklos als Vorlage des sogen. Dionysius Areopagita in der Lehre vom Übel," Historisches Jahrbuch 16, 253-273 and 721-748.
  • Töröner M. (2007) Union and Distinction in the Thought of St. Maximus the Confessor. Oxford University Press.
Еще
Статья научная