Transcendental materialism of the sociological concept of goal and meaning

Introduction. The fact that everything that exists cannot be doubted, and, at the same time, it cannot be doubted that everything that exists must exist for anything. This judgment clearly demonstrates the fact that all existence must pursue a certain goal of its existence, the striving to attain which should justify the meaning of the manifestation of the signs of the existence of everything that exists, regardless of whether the observer exists or knows any observer about this existence. In this regard, the concepts of objects of goal and meaning can be represented as the root causes of the fact that everything that exists “strives” to show signs of its existence. At the same time, in the absence of the observing signs of existence, the concepts of goal and meaning can be clearly defined as the sociological categories of “pure goal” and “pure meaning”. Methods. These categories of “pure goal” and “pure meaning” reflect the “striving” of everything that exists, as a subject of “pure abstraction”, to transform from a disordered and unformed existence to an orderly and well-formed existence, under which conditions reincarnation into a concrete object can occur. Results. Reincarnation into an object that is specifically existing creates the conditions for the notion of goal and meaning to acquire an indistinct definition due to the “instability” of changes in the states and properties of interacting objects of concretely existing ones. Conclusions. In the worldview of transcendental materialism, the sociological category of goal and meaning can act as a certain root cause for the manifestation of signs of changes in the states and properties of any object that specifically exists.