Transformation of the role of PMSCS in the post-international world and their classification

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. The evolving landscape of international relations has witnessed a profound transformation in the concept of security. Traditionally, governments held an exclusive monopoly over the provision of security, relying on their military and defense forces to safeguard their interests and protect their citizens. However, the post-Cold War era has ushered in a paradigm shift, with non-state actors emerging as formidable challengers to this traditional monopoly. At the forefront of these non-governmental actors stand private military and security companies (PMSCs), organizations that offer a diverse array of military and security services to governments across the globe. Methods and materials. This comprehensive study explores the multifaceted world of PMSCs, categorizing them into three distinct types based on the nature of the services they provide: offensive, reactive, and defensive. Through an analytical-descriptive research approach and the innovative lens of post- international theory, this research delves deep into the role of PMSCs in an increasingly interconnected world. Analysis. The central question that underpins this study is the extent of PMSCs’ influence in a post-international world and their responses to the evolving global military security environment. It scrutinizes whether governments continue to maintain an exclusive monopoly over security and military operations or if these responsibilities have been increasingly assumed by non-governmental actors like PMSCs.

Еще

Security, post-internationalism, globalization, non-state actors, offensive pmscs, defensive pmscs, reactive pmscs

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149145737

IDR: 149145737   |   DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.3.16

Список литературы Transformation of the role of PMSCS in the post-international world and their classification

  • Al-Rawi A.K. Sectarianism and the Arab Spring: Framing the Popular Protests in Bahrain. Global Media and Communication, 2015, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 25-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766515573550
  • Arendt H. On Violence. Harvest Publications, 1970. 106 p.
  • Avant D. The Privatization of Security and Change in the Control of Force. International Studies Perspectives Policy Forum, 2004, no. 5 (2), pp. 153-157.
  • Axford B. Theories of Globalization. Wiley Publications, 2013. 240 p.
  • Beutel M.D. Private Military Companies: Their Emergence, Importance, and A Call for Global Regulation. M.A Thesis. Norwich, 2005. 150 p.
  • Buzan B. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. ECPR Press, 2007. 318 p.
  • Carmola K. Private Security, Contractors and New War, Contemporary Security Studies. New York, Routledge, 2010. 204 p.
  • Chesterman S., Fisher A. Public Order: The Outsourcing of Public Security and Its Limits. London, Oxford University Press, 2009. 262 p.
  • Chkhaidze N. PMC Redut: The Wagner Group’s Potential Replacement. Geopolitical Monitor. 2023.
  • Cohen E.A., Tellis A.J., Bially J.L., Layne C. Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age. Foreign Affairs (Council on Foreign Relations), 2001, vol. 80, no. 5. 212 p. DOI: 10.2307/20050283
  • Deschamps S. Towards the use of the Private Military Companies in the United Nations Peacekeeping Operations. Thesis. 2005. 94 p.
  • Elsea J.K., Schwartz M., Nakamura K.H. Private Security Contractors in Iraq: Background, Legal Status, and Other Issues. CRC Report for Congress. 2008. 60 p. DOI: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/h ttps://sgp.fas.org/crs/natsec/RL32419.pdf
  • Goble P. Russian Nationalist Group, Acting as a Private Military Company, Worries Kremlin. Eurasia Daily Monitor, 2018, vol. 15, no. 164. URL: https://jamestown.org/program/russian-nationalist-groupacting-as-a-private-military-company-worries-kremlin/
  • ICoC. The International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers. Swiss Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2010. 15 p. URL: https://observatoire-securite-privee.org/en/document/408
  • ICRC. The Montreux Document: On Pertinent International Legal Obligations and Good Practices for States Related to Operations of Private Military and Security Companies During Armed Conflict. International Committee for the Red Cross, 2009. 46 p. URL: https://shop.icrc.org/download/ebook?sku=0996/002-ebook
  • ICRC. International Humanitarian Law and Private Military/Security Companies. International Committee of the Red Cross, 2013. URL: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/ihl-and-private-militarysecurity-companies-faq
  • Krahmann E. Private Security Companies and the State Monopoly on Violence: A Case of Norm Change? Frankfurt, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF), 2009. 34 p. URL: https://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/HSFK/hsfk_downloads/prif88_02.pdf
  • Leander A. The Power to Construct International Security: On the Significance of Private Military Companies. Millennium-Journal of International Studes, 2005, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 803-825.
  • Mampey L., Mekdour M. La guerre en Sous – Traitance, l’urgence d’un Cadre Regulateur Pour les Sociétés Militaires et de Sécurité Privées. Rapport Du GRIP: Group de Recherche et D’Information sur la Paix et la sécurité. Bruxelles, 2010. 32 p.
  • Marten K. Warlords: Strong-arm Brokers in Weak States. Cornell, Cornell University Press, 2015. 280 p.
  • McGrew A., Held D. Globalization Theory: Approaches and Controversies. Cambridge, UK, Polity, 2007. 288 p.
  • Melzer N. Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Law. International Committee of the Red Cross, 2009. 89 p. URL: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4a670dec2.html
  • Nebolsina M.A. Addressing the Role of Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs) Involved by the UN in Peacekeeping Operations. SSRN, 2020, pp. 1-7. DOI: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3510116_code 3886723.pdf?abstractid=3510116& mirid=1&type=2
  • Nebolsina M.A. Private Military and Security Companies, A Theoretical Overview. Russia in Global Affairs, 2019, vol. 17, pp. 76-106. DOI: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335586026_Private_Military_and_Security_Companies_A_theoretical_overview
  • Noormohammadi M. The Expansion of Information and Communication Technologies and the Evolution of Security. Tehran, Mizan Publication, 2011. 240 p.
  • OHCHR. International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries. New York, United Nations, 1989.
  • Ribeiro P.J., Oliveira R. The Impact of Militia Actions on Public Security Policies in Rio de Janeiro. Amsterdam, Crime and Globalization, 2010. 36 p.
  • Rondeaux C. Decoding the Wagner Group: Analyzing the Role of Private Military Security Contractors in Russian Proxy Warfare. New America, Arizona, 2019. 86 p. URL: https://d1y8sb8igg2f8e.cloudfront.net/documents/Decoding_the_Wagner_Group.pdf
  • Rosenau J. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1990. 504 p.
  • RG. Lyons, & M. Mastanduno, Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995. 360 p.
  • Rosenau J., Durfee M. Thinking Theory Thoroughly, Coherent Approaches To an Incoherent World. New York, Routledge, 2019. 288 p.
  • Saifullin E.K. Private Military and Security Companies and International Law. Pathways to Peace and Security, 2018, no. 2 (55), pp. 51-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2018-2-51-63
  • Schroeder E., Wilde G., Sherman J., Herr T. Hackers, Hoodies, and Helmets: Technology and the Changing Face of Russian Private Military Contractors. The Cyber Statecraft Initiative (Issue Brief), 2022. 10 p.
  • SEESAC. The Sarajevo Code of Conduct for Private Security Companies. South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons, 2006. 17 p. URL: https://www.seesac.org/f/docs/Private-Security-Companies/The-Sarajevo-Codeof-Conduct-for-Private-Security-Companies-EN.pdf
  • Shittu A.K. A Conceptual Examination of Militia Movements and Challenges to Socio-Economic Development in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 2013, no. 14, pp. 29-37.
  • Singer P.W. Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Cornell University Press, 2003. 360 p.
  • Tebib R. Les sociétés militaires privies (SMP). Géostrategiques (Report), 2010. 228 p.
  • Eighth United Nations Congress, Basic Principles of Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials. Havana, United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Treatment of Offenders, 1990. 4 p. URL: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/firearms.pdf
  • General Assembly Resolution, Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials. New York, United Nations, 1979. 4 p. URL: ohchr.org/sites/default/files/codeofconduct.pdf
  • Vittori P.M. Military Services Providers and the Threat to State Sovereignty (Thesis). San Antonio, University of Texas, 2007. 100 p.
  • Williamson J.A. Challenges of Twenty-First Century Conflicts: A Look at Direct Participation in Hostilities. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 2010, no. 20, pp. 457-472. URL: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djcil/vol20/iss3/7
  • Wood J.A. The Paradox of Power: Private Military Companies and the Decline of the State. Proquest, Umi Dissertation Publishing, 2010. 82 p.
  • Yazdanfam M. Globalization, Security and Police. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 2009, vol. 12, no. 44, pp. 123-150.
  • ChVK (PMC), vk.com. 2020, February 8, Retrieved from VKontakte Social Network. URL: https://vk.com/wall-191790490_16
  • Zabci F. Private Military Companies: Shadow Soldiers of Neo-Colonialism. Capital & Class, 2007, no. 31, pp. 1-10.
Еще
Статья научная