Understandings of Graduate Students on Nature of Science
Автор: Mustafa Serdar Koksal, Canan Tunc Sahin
Журнал: International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS) @ijmecs
Статья в выпуске: 4 vol.5, 2013 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Knowing about nature of science (NOS) and its products is a basic requirement of all graduate students and researchers due to being both members of society and experts on different scientific disciplines. As the first step, determining NOS understandings of graduate students has importance to go further in developing current situation. Therefore, this study aimed to determine NOS understandings of graduate students from different disciplines. The study included seven graduate students who were enrolled in universities as researchers. As the data collection way, face-to-face interview was utilized. The data of the study was analyzed by assigning the participants to four categories; expert, naive, mixed and not applicable. The results showed that majority of the participants were expert on social and cultural embeddedness of science and role of creativity and imagination in science while majority of the participants were naive on the aspects of “hierarchy between theories and laws”. Majority of them had mixed understandings on the aspects of existence of only one method in science, subjectivity, tentativeness. Interestingly, all of the participants were naive in terms of definition of science. The results and implications of the study will be discussed..
Nature of Science, Graduate Students, Researchers, Science
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15014540
IDR: 15014540
Список литературы Understandings of Graduate Students on Nature of Science
- Turkish Ministry of Education. Ninth Grade Biology Curriculum. Ankara, Turkey. 2007.
- AAAS. Benchmarks for Science Literacy, Project 206, Science Literacy for a Changing Future. Report of American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved on November 2012 from (http://www.project2061.org/). 1994.
- Kjaernsli, M. and Lie, S. PISA and scientific literacy: Similarities and differences between the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 271–286.2004.
- Olsen, R.V., Kjærnsli, M. and Lie, S. Using single items in PISA to explore international diversity in scientific literacy. Paper presented at the 5th ESERA conference Barcelona, Spain. 2005.
- OECD. The PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: OECD. 2003.
- Hurd, P.D. Scientific Literacy: New Minds for a Changing World. Science Education, 82 (3), 407-416. 1998
- Lederman, N. G. Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In Abell, S. & Lederman, N. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Science Education. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 2007.
- McComas, W. F. The Principle Elements of the Nature of Science: Dispelling the Myths. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53–70). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1998.
- Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L. and Schwartz, R. S. Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (6), 497-521.2002.
- Khishfe, R and Lederman, N. Teaching Nature of Science within a Controversial Topic: Integrated versus Nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Scıence Teaching, 43, 4, 395–418. 2006.
- Khishfe, R., and Abd-El-Khalick, F. Influence of explicit and eeflective views versus implicit inquiry orientated instruction on sixth graders views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578.2002.
- Ryan, A. G. and Aikenhead, G.S. Students’ Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science. Science Education, 76 (6), 559-580.1992.
- Palmquist, B. and Finley, F. Preservice Teachers’ Views of the Nature of Science During A Postbaccalaureate Science Teaching Program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 595-615.1997.
- Irez, S. Are we prepared?: An Assessment of Preservice Science Teacher Educators’ Beliefs About Nature of Science. Science Teacher Education, 90, (6), 1113-1143.2006.
- Chang, T. An investigation of Taiwanese graduate students’ beliefs about scientific knowledge. Bulletin of National Taiwan Normal University. 40, 583–618, 1995.
- Jehng,J.J. Johnson, S.D. and Anderson, R.C. Schooling and students’ epistemological beliefs about learning, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 23–35. 1993.
- Paulsen, M. B. and Wells, C. T. Domain differences in the epistemological beliefs of college students. Research in Higher Education, 39,(4), 365–384.1998.
- Marzooghi, R., Fouladchang, M. and Shemshiri, B. Gender and Graduate level differences in epistemological beliefs of Iranian undergraduate students. Journal of Applied Scences. 8, (24), 4698-4701. 2008.
- Samarapungavan, A., Westby, E. L. and Bodner, G. M. Contextual Epistemic Development in Science: A Comparison of Chemistry Students and Research Chemists. Science Education, 90 (3), 468-495.2006.
- Khishfe, R and Lederman, N.G. Relationship between instructional context and views of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (8), 939-962.2007.
- Schwartz, R. S. and Lederman, N.G. What scientists say: Scientists’ views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 721-771.2008.
- Koksal, M.S. Discipline dependent understandings of graduate students in biology education department about the aspects of nature of science, Education and Science, 35, 157, 68-83. 2010.
- Irez, S. Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks. Science Education, 93(3), 422-447.2008.
- Taskın, O. Çobanoğlu, E. O. Apaydın, Z. Çobanoğlu, İ.H.Yılmaz, B. and Şahin, B. Undergraduate Students’ Perception of Theory Concept. Boğaziçi University Journal of Education, 25 (2), 35-51.2010.
