Urban environment as a resource for combining professional and parental functions
Автор: Bagirova Anna P., Notman Olga V., Blednova Natalia D.
Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en
Рубрика: Social and economic development
Статья в выпуске: 3 т.14, 2021 года.
Бесплатный доступ
In the context of approving the “quality of life” concept, the formation of accessible and comfortable living environment is mentioned in Russia's national projects and in Russian towns' development programs. The purpose of the study is to analyze the quality of urban environment in terms of infrastructure conditions, located within walking distance, that minimize physical, material, and time costs of parents' forced daily mobility for educating and developing children. The scientific novelty of the study is related to the first-implemented approach to considering urban environment of residential neighborhoods as a resource for combining professional and parental functions. The empirical basis includes data of a mass survey of citizens-parents conducted in the megalopolis (Yekaterinburg) and the results of in-depth interviews with mothers of preschool and school-age children. The results of the study show a high subjective significance of territorial proximity of key child infrastructure facilities for successful combination of parental and professional functions. Moreover, it indicates a direct interconnection between the saturation of residing places with children's infrastructure facilities and overall satisfaction of parents with the quality of urban environment. The authors record the highest forced mobility due to the lack of walking distance services in the field of intellectual, creative, and sports development of children. A total number of deprived urban neighborhoods and the share of parents who are forced to use infrastructure services outside their neighborhoods indicate that there are spatial inequalities in access to urban goods. Practical significance of the study is the scientific justification of the need to develop comprehensive programs for the formation of a functionally rich environment in microlocal territories during the adoption of a progressive model for the development of a megapolis - “a network of 15-minute cities”. The authors conclude that hyper-proximity-accessibility of urban services can be a significant resource (in a broader social policy for supporting families) for successful combination of parental and professional functions, ultimately contributing to improving the quality of life of citizens with children.
Urban environment, parental and professional functions, family-friendly policies, child infrastructure, forced mobility, neighborhoods, pedestrian accessibility, 15-minute city model
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147235411
IDR: 147235411 | DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.3.75.12
Список литературы Urban environment as a resource for combining professional and parental functions
- Maclnnes J. Work-Life balance in Europe: A response for the baby bust or reward for the baby boomers? European Societies, 2006, vol. 8 (2), pp. 223–249. DOI: 10.1080/14616690600644988
- Rozhdestvenskaya E.Yu. Academic careers of women: The balances and mbalances of life and work. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomichekie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes, 2019, no. 3, pp. 27–47. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.3.03 (in Russian).
- Remery C., Schippers J. Work-family conflict in the European Union: The impact of organizational and public facilities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, vol. 16 (22). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224419
- Brauner C., Wöhrmann A.M., Frank K., Michel A. Health and work-life balance across types of work schedules: A latent class analysis. Applied Ergonomics, 2019, vol. 81. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102906
- McCanlies E., Mnatsakanova A., Andrew M., Violanti J., Hartley T. Childcare stress and anxiety in police officers moderated by work factors. Policing: An International Journal, 2019, vol. 42 (6), pp. 992–1006. DOI: 10.1108/PIJPSM-10-2018-0159
- Rozhdestvenskaya E.Yu., Isupova O.G. Work-life balance: Family, leisure, and professional activity. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomichekie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes, 2019, no. 3, pp. 3–7. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.3.01 (in Russian).
- Kalabikhina I.E., Shaikenova Zh. D. Estimation of time transfers within households. Demografichiskoye Obozrenie=Demographic Review, 2019, no. 5 (4), pp. 36–65 (in Russian).
- Patrushev V.D. Zhizn' gorozhanina (1965–1998) [Life of a Citizen (1965–1998)]. Moscow: Academia, 2000.
- Nartova N.А. Motherhood in contemporary Western sociological debate. Zhenshhina v rossiiskom obschestve=Woman in Russian Society, 2016, no. 3 (80), pp. 39–53 (in Russian).
- Avdeeva A., Isupova O., Kuleshova A., Chernova Zh., Shpakovskaja L. Roditel'stvo 2.0: Pochemu sovremennye roditeli dolzhny razbirat'sa vo vsem? [Parenting 2.0: Why modern parents should understand everything?] Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 2021. 164 p.
- Isupova O.G. Intensive motherhood in Russia: Mothers, daughters, and sons in school growing. Neprikosnovennyi zapas. Debaty o politike i kul'ture=Inviolable Reserve. Debates about Politics and Culture, 2018, no. 3, pp. 180–189 (in Russian).
- Olivetti C., Petrongolo B. The economic consequences of family policies: Lessons from a century of legislation in high-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2017, vol. 31 (1), pp. 205–230. DOI: 10.1257/jep.31.1.205
- Stanczyk A. Does paid family leave improve household economic security following a birth? Evidence from California. Social Service Review, 2019, vol. 93 (2). DOI: 10.1086/703138
- Breeschoten L., Evertsson M. When does part-time work relate to less work-life conflict for parents? Moderating influences of workplace support and gender in the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Community, Work & Family, 2019, vol. 22 (5), pp. 606–628. DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2019.1581138
- Beham B., Drobnič S., Präg P., Baierl A. & Eckner J. Part-time work and gender inequality in Europe: A comparative analysis of satisfaction with work–life balance. European Societies, 2019, vol. 21 (3), pp. 378–402. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2018.1473627
- Gehl J. Cities for People. Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 2012. 276 p.
- Bor'ba za gorozhanina: Chelovecheskii potentsial i gorodskaya sreda [Struggle for the citizen: Human potential and urban environment]. Ed. by A. Vysokovsky. Moscow: NRU HSE Graduate School of Urbanism; IV Moscow Urban Forum, 2014. 102 p.
- Kabisch S., Koch F., Gawel E., Haase A., Knapp S., Krellenberg K., Nivala J., Zehnsdorf A. Urban Transformations: Sustainable Urban Development through Resource Efficiency, Quality of Life and Resilience. Dordrecht: Springer, 2018. 384 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59324-1(2018)
- Naberushkina E.K. A city for everyone: Sociological analysis of accessibility of urban space for disabled people. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii=The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2011, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 119–139 (in Russian).
- Shabunova A.A., Natsun L.N. The urban environment accessibility for people with disabilities. Voprosy territorialnogo razvitiya=Territorial Development Issues, 2014, no. 3 (13), pp. 1–15 (in Russian).
- Lebedeva E.V. Children and youth in a modern city: Sociological analysis. Sotsiologiya=Sociology, 2013, no. 2, pp. 122–132 (in Russian).
- Filipova A.G., Lebedeva E.V. Child and youth friendliness of the urban environment: From theoretical approaches to expert interpretations. Oikumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya=Ojkumena. Regional Researches, 2019, no. 2. pp. 101–112 (in Russian).
- Balakireva M.S. Everyday mobility study of town dwellers with children: Application of mixed method research strategy. Interaktsiya. Interv'yu. Interpretatsiya=Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 2015, no. 10, pp. 60–69 (in Russian).
- Shpakovskaya L.L., Chernova Zh.V. A family-friendly city: A new public space for children and their parents. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomichekie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes, 2017, no. 2, pp. 160–177 (in Russian).
- Kienko T.S. Elderly citizens and the audiovisual environment of the city: Age as a factor of solidarity with space. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii=The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2019, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 57–87. DOI: 10.31119/jssa.2019.22.4.3 (in Russian).
- Van Hoof J., Kazak K.J., Perek-Białas M.J., Peek T.M.S. The challenges of urban ageing: Making cities age-friendly in Europe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, vol. 15. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15112473
- Glazychev V.L. Sotsial'no-Ekologicheskaya Interpretaciya Gorodskoy Sredy [Socio-Ecological Interpretation of Urban Environment]. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. 180 p.
- Dridze T.M. Human and urban environment in predictive social design. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'=Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 1994, no. 1, pp. 131–138 (in Russian).
- Moreno C. Droit de cité, de la “ville-monde” à la “ville du quart d’heure”. De l’Observatoire, 2020. 179 p.
- Mulíˇcek O., Osman R., Seidenglanz D. Urban rhythms: A chronotopic approach to urban timespace. Time & Society, 2014, vol. 24 (3), pp. 304–325. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X14535905
- Maksimov A.M., Nenasheva M.V., Vereshchagin I.F., Shubina T.F., Shubina P.V. Creating a comfortable urban environment: Problems of interaction between society and government in the implementation of priority projects at the management municipal level. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, Prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 1. pp. 71–90. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.1.73.6 (in Russian).