Влияние стейкхолдеров на экологическое инвестирование компаний Арктической зоны Российской Федерации

Влияние стейкхолдеров на экологическое инвестирование компаний Арктической зоны Российской Федерации

Автор: Каргинова-Губинова Валентина Владимировна

Журнал: Регионология @regionsar

Рубрика: Экономика и управление народным хозяйством

Статья в выпуске: 3 (120) т.30, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Введение. Необходимость перехода к устойчивому развитию компаний арктических регионов России и их низкий уровень инвестиций в охрану окружающей среды делают актуальным изучение факторов, определяющих объемы экологического инвестирования. Цель статьи - на основе проведенного исследования проанализировать влияние на уровень экологических инвестиций компании отдельных групп финансовых стейкхолдеров. Материалы и методы. Методология работы построена на теории стейкхолдеров. Изучались показатели инвестиционной активности компаний северо-западных арктических регионов России, для чего были использованы методы описательной статистики, проведены иерархический кластерный и дискриминантный анализы. Результаты исследования. Выявлено, что компании изучаемой территории характеризуются низким объемом экологических инвестиций, однако он выше, чем в среднем по стране. Направление и сила влияния отдельных стейкхолдеров на инвестирование в охрану окружающей среды дифференцированы по экологическим направлениям. При этом все выделенные группы стейкхолдеров оказывают положительное, хотя и различное воздействие на уровень инвестиций в охрану окружающей среды по всем направлениям в совокупности. В наибольшей степени текущий объем экологических инвестиций обусловлен интересами корпоративных кредиторов и федеральных органов власти, в наименьшей - собственников, особенно иностранных. Обсуждение и заключение. С учетом полученных результатов даны рекомендации для повышения текущего уровня экологической инвестиционной активности компаний. Теоретическая значимость работы определяется уточнением теории стейкхолдеров и концепции зеленых финансов. Практическая значимость заключается в получении возможности выработать адресные меры по поддержке заинтересованных инвесторов и повышению ориентации прочих лиц на охрану окружающей среды.

Еще

Экологические инвестиции, охрана окружающей среды, корпоративная экологическая ответственность, теория стейкхолдеров, финансовые стейкхолдеры, архангельская область, республика карелия, республика коми, мурманская область, северо-западный федеральный округ

Еще

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238969

IDR: 147238969   |   DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.120.030.202203.533-554

Список литературы Влияние стейкхолдеров на экологическое инвестирование компаний Арктической зоны Российской Федерации

  • Cadez S., Czemy A., Letmathe P. Stakeholder Pressures and Corporate Climate Change Mitigation Strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2019;28(1):1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2070
  • Chowdhury M.M.H., Paul S.K., Sianaki O.A., Quaddus M.A. Dynamic Sustainabili-ty Requirements of Stakeholders and the Supply Portfolio. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;255:1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjdepro.2020.120148
  • Lopes de Sousa Jabbour A.B., Vazquez-Brust D.A., Chiappetta Jabbour C.J., Ri-beiro D.A. The Interplay between Stakeholders, Resources and Capabilities in Climate Change Strategy: Converting Barriers into Cooperation. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020;29(3):1362-1386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2438
  • Karginova-Gubinova V.V. Causal Relationship between Environmental and Financial Indicators of Russian Industrial Companies. World of Economics and Management. 2021;21(3):70-88. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2021-21-3-70-88
  • De Haan M., Dam L., Scholtens B. The Drivers of the Relationship between Corporate Environmental Performance and Stock Market Returns. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2012;2(3-4):338-375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2012.738601
  • Liu Z. Unraveling the Complex Relationship between Environmental and Financial Performance - A Multilevel Longitudinal Analysis. International Journal of Production Economics. 2020;219:328-340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.ijpe.2019.07.005
  • Molchanova T.K., Yashalova N.N., Ruban D.A. Environmental Concerns of Russian Businesses: Top Company Missions and Climate Change Agenda. Climate. 2020;8(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8040056
  • Agarkov S., Motina T., Matviishin D. The Environmental Impactcaused by Developing Energy Resources in the Arctic Region. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environ-mentalScience. 2018;180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/180/1/012007
  • Samarina V.P., Skufina T.P., Savon D.Y., Shinkevich A.I. Management of Externalities in the Context of Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic Zone. Sustainability. 2021;13(14). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147749
  • Fang X., Junqing L. Do Commercial Banks Incorporate the Environmental Risk in Loan Pricing Decision? Evidence from the Environmental Responsibility Score. Journal of Finance and Economics. 2019;45(11):57-69. doi: https://doi.org/10.16538/j. cnki.jfe.2019.11.005
  • Kim Y., Statman M. Do Corporations Invest Enough in Environmental Responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics. 2012;105(1):115-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0954-2
  • David P., Bloom M., Hillman A. Investor Activism, Managerial Responsiveness, and Corporate Social Performance. Strategic Management Journal. 2007;28(1):91-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.571
  • Neubaum D.O., Zahra S.A. Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Performance: The Moderating Effects of Investment Horizon, Activism and Coordination. Journal of Management. 2006;32(1):108-131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277797
  • Nguyen V.H., Choi B., Agbola F.W. Corporate Social Responsibility and Debt Maturity: Australian Evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2020;62(2). doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101374
  • O'Rourke A. A New Politics of Engagement: Shareholder Activism for Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2003;12(4):227-239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.364
  • Husted B.W., de Sousa-Filho J.M. The Impact of Sustainability Governance, Country Stakeholder Orientation, and Country Risk on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;155(2):93-102. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.025
  • Southwood P. Shareholder Engagement: Prospects for Improving Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Business Performance Management. 2003;5(2/3):223-236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2003.003252
  • Hess D. Public Pensions and the Promise of Shareholder Activism for the Next Frontier of Corporate Governance: Sustainable Economic Development. Virginia Law & Business Review. 2007;2(2):221-263. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.988792
  • Chen H.-Y., Yang S.S. Do Investors Exaggerate Corporate ESG Information? Evidence of the ESG Momentum Effect in the Taiwanese Market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2020;63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101407
  • Park S.R., Jang J.Y. The Impact of ESG Management on Investment Decision: Institutional Investors' Perceptions of Country-Specific ESG Criteria. International Journal of Financial Studies. 2021;9(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9030048
  • Marshall R.S., Akoorie M.E.M., Hamann R., Sinha P. Environmental Practices in the Wine Industry: An Empirical Application of the Theory of Reasoned Action and Stakeholder Theory in the United States and New Zealand. Journal of World Business. 2010;45(4):405-414. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjwb.2009.08.009
  • Van der Laan Smith J., Adhikari A., Tondkar R.H. Exploring Differences in Social Disclosures Internationally: A Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 2005;24(2):123-151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjaccpubpol.2004.12.007
  • Alon I., Lattemann C., Fetscherin M., et al. Usage of Public Corporate Communications of Social Responsibility in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC). International Journal of Emerging Markets. 2010;5(1):6-22. doi: https://doi. org/10.1108/17468801011018248
  • Polemis M.L., Spais A. Disentangling the Drivers of Renewable Energy Investments: The Role of Behavioral Factors. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020;29(6):2170-2180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2493
  • Wielewska I. The Importance of Economic Instruments in the Process of Implementing Ecological Investments in Agribusiness Companies. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference "Economic Science for Rural Development". 2018. p. 368-376. doi: https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2018.043
  • West J., Bailey I., Winter M. Renewable Energy Policy and Public Perceptions of Renewable Energy: A Cultural Theory Approach. Energy Policy. 2010;38(10):5739-5748. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.024
  • Juholin E. For Business or the Good of All? A Finnish Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Governance. 2004;4(3):20-31. doi: https://doi. org/10.1108/14720700410547477
  • Banerjee S.B., Iyer E.S., Kashyap R.K. Corporate Environmentalism: Antecedents and Influence of Industry Type. Journal of Marketing. 2003;67(2):106-122. doi: https://doi. org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.106.18604
  • Gangi F., D'Angelo E., Daniele L.M., Varrone N. Assessing the Impact of Socially Responsible Human Resources Management on Company Environmental Performance and Cost of Debt. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2021;28(5):1511-1527. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2179
  • Walls J.L., Berrone P., Phan P.H. Corporate Governance and Environmental Performance: Is There Really a Link? Strategic Management Journal. 2012;33(8):885-913. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1952
  • Wei F., Ding B., Kong Y. Female Directors and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Environmental Investment of Chinese Listed Companies. Sustainability. 2017;9(12). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122292
  • Murillo-Luna J.L., Garcés-Ayerbe C., Rivera-Torres P. Why Do Patterns of Environmental Response Differ? A Stakeholders' Pressure Approach. Strategic Management Journal. 2008;29(11):1225-1240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.711
  • Henriques I., Sharma S. Pathways of Stakeholder Influence in the Canadian Forest Industry. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2005;14(6):384-398. doi: https://doi. org/10.1002/bse.456
  • Fifka M.S., Pobizhan M. An Institutional Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility in Russia. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014;82:192-201. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.091
  • Scotty J., Rodgers P. Sustainable Development in the Russia Federation: The Limits of Greening within Industrial Firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2012;19(3):178-190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.263
  • Sparkes R., Cowton C.J. The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. 2004;52:45-57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033106.43260.99
  • Huang H., Wu D., Gaya J. Chinese Shareholders' Reaction to the Disclosure of Environmental Violations: A CSR Perspective. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. 2017;2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-017-0022-z
  • Chan M.C., Watson J., Woodliff D. Corporate Governance Quality and CSR Disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics. 2014;125:59-73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1887-8
  • Chen S., Wang Y., Albitar K., Huang Z. Does Ownership Concentration Affect Corporate Environmental Responsibility Engagement? The Mediating Role of Corporate Leverage. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2021;21(1):S13-S24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bir.2021.02.001
  • Punzo G., Panarello D., Pagliuca M.M., et al. Assessing the Role of Perceived Values and Felt Responsibility on Pro-Environmental Behaviours: A Comparison Across four EU Countries. Environmental Science & Policy. 2019;101:311-322. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.006
  • Sargisson R.J., De Groot J.I.M., Steg L. The Relationship between Sociodemo-graphics and Environmental Values Across Seven European Countries. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02253
  • Attig N., Boubakri N., El Ghoul S., Guedhami O. Firm Internationalization and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016;134:171-197. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2410-6
  • Khalid F., Sun J., Huang G., Su C.-Y. Environmental, Social and Governance Performance of Chinese Multinationals: A Comparison of State- and Non-State-Owned Enterprises. Sustainability. 2021;13(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074020
  • Symeou P.C., Zyglidopoulos S., Williamson P. Internationalization as a Driver of the Corporate Social Performance of Extractive Industry Firms. Journal of World Business. 2018;53(1):27-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjwb.2017.07.004
  • Christmann P. Multinational Companies and the Natural Environment: Determinants of Global Environmental Policy. Academy of Management Journal. 2004;47(5):747-760. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/20159616
  • Dowell G., Hart S., Yeung B. Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value? Management Science. 2000;46(8):1059-1074. doi: https://doi. org/10.1287/mnsc.46.8.1059.12030
  • Park S.-B. Multinationals and Sustainable Development: Does Internationalization Develop Corporate Sustainability of Emerging Market Multinationals? Business Strategy and the Environment. 2018;27(8):1514-1524. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ bse.2209
  • Erragragui E. Do Creditors Price Firms' Environmental, Social and Governance Risks? Research in International Business and Finance. 2018;45:197-207. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.151
  • Ryszawska B., Zabawa J. The Environmental Responsibility of the World's Largest Banks. Economics & Business. 2018;32(1):51-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2018-0004
  • Hassan Al-Tamimi H.A. Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of UAE Banks. Global Journal of Business Research. 2014;8(3):91-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.2260298
  • Fernández-Cuesta C., Castro P., Tascón M.T., Castaño F.J. The Effect of Environmental Performance on Financial Debt. European Evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;207:379-390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2018.09.239
  • Gong G., Huang X., Wu S., Tian H., Li W. Punishment by Securities Regulators, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Cost of Debt. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021;171:337-356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04438-z
  • Yang W., Li L. Energy Efficiency, Ownership Structure, and Sustainable Development: Evidence from China. Sustainability. 2017;9(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ su9060912
  • Huang L., Lei Z. How Environmental Regulation Affect Corporate Green Investment: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;279. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123560
  • Yadava R.N., Sinha B. Scoring Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2011 Guidelines for Assessing Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Leading Public and Private Indian Companies. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016;138:549-558. doi: https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-015-2597-1
  • Clark G., Hebb T. Pension Fund Corporate Engagement. The Fifth Stage of Capitalism. Relations Industrielles/IndustrialRelations. 2004;59(1):142-171. Available at: https:// www.jstor.org/stable/23077578 (accessed 15.12.2021).
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp