Identification of cases when administrative punishment in the form of warning may be applied to an arbitration administrator: analysis of judicial practice

This article reveals the features of such administrative punishment as a warning. The general approach formed in judicial practice and special cases encountered in practice are analyzed, namely, when a warning is applied to an insolvency practitioner twice in a row. It is noted that the offense will be considered committed for the first time after the period during which the person is considered to be subject to administrative punishment (administrative punishment) has expired. The circumstances under which an insolvency practitioner may be subject to administrative punishment in the form of a warning are revealed, namely, on the date of the decision: the period during which the person is considered to be subject to administrative punishment has not begun (the previously issued court decision imposing an administrative punishment in the form of a warning has not entered into legal force) or the period during which the person is considered to be subject to administrative punishment has expired.