“Warrior” kurgan of Tasmola culture at the Balykty burial ground

Бесплатный доступ

In 2022, scientific research was conducted on kurgan No. 1 at the Balykty burial site from the Early Iron Age (Kazakhstan, Akmola Region). The stone mound had a circular shape with a diameter of 4.5 meters and a height of 0.2 meters. There are traces of robbers from ancient times. 20 bronze items, one stone blade and one bone awl were found inside the barrow pit. The horse harness set was crafted in the “animal style.” Daggers, knives, arrowheads, grindstones, and bones were well-preserved. Based on the artifacts found, the site was classified as a “warrior” burial, typical of the Tasmola culture. Anthropological studies indicated the burial belonged to a male aged 45-50 years. Radiocarbon analysis, carried out by the Vilnius Radiocarbon Laboratory, dated the burial to the 8th-7th centuries BCE. The stone tool was made of sandstone. The material composition of the artifacts was analyzed, revealing that 90 percent of the metal was copper. A comparative analysis of the structures of other small burial sites in the region and the items found in them was conducted. Based on the analysis of materials and interdisciplinary research results, it was concluded that the kurgan is the burial site of a “warrior” from the Tasmola culture period.

Еще

Northern saryarka, balykty, tasmola culture, early saka period, warriors kurgans, harness, animal style, interdisciplinary research

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14131528

IDR: 14131528   |   DOI: 10.53737/2713-2021.2024.79.40.005

Текст научной статьи “Warrior” kurgan of Tasmola culture at the Balykty burial ground

№ 17. 2024

The main methodology of the study is to determine the status of early Saka period warrior monuments discovered in the northern region of Kazakhstan, using archaeological materials and interdisciplinary research. Based on this, the methodology of the work focuses on the scientific analysis of fossil material processing results and natural science expertise, comparing them with similar burial monuments.

Description of excavations. Excavations were carried out on the stone-earth kurgan No. 1 of the burial ground. The diameter is 4.5 m, the height is 0.2 m. Traces of looting are observed in the central part of the burial mound. The surface of the mound is covered with turf, beneath which a layer of scattered small stones emerges. The stratigraphic layer reache s the bedrock. Below it, a burial pit was discovered, extending from the bedrock level in a northwest-southeast direction, with a dark gray color. Several medium-sized stones have been preserved around the oval pit. The dimensions are 0.45 × 0.4 × 0.15 m. There is no tomb structure. The dimensions of the burial pit at the bedrock level are 2.6 × 1.2 m.

The burial pit was looted. The pit is filled with small stones and soil. At a depth of 0.45 m below the bedrock level, fragments of scattered human ribs were found. A human bone in an anatomical position was found at a depth of 0.9 m. There are no bones in the chest and back. The head of the person is facing the west, it is placed on its back. During a violent robbery, the skull was severely damaged. The legs did not move from their original position. The right leg is slightly bent. The dimensions of the floor of the b urial pit are 2.6 × 1.1 m. The depth of the pit is 1.0 m (fig. 3).

Although the burial mound was looted, the archaeological artifacts from the burial pit were well preserved. A bronze dagger is placed near the warrior’s right hip. It is located parallel to the right leg at a distance of 9 cm. The upper part and the central part are crescent-shaped. The total length of the bronze dagger is 34.6 cm. The length of the blade is 23.2 cm. The thickness of the blade is 0.7 cm. The thickness of the handle is 0.5 cm (fig. 4: 1 ).

A bronze bit and two cheekpieces were found near the right elbow, scattered during the looting. The total length of the bit is 18.9 cm. The connected parts are round with visible attachment points, and the ends are p ointed-oval (fig. 4: 5 ). The lengths of the cheekpieces are 12.8 cm and 14.1 cm. One has a slightly rounded shape, while the other is straight. The diameters of the rounded parts at both ends of the cheekpieces are 1.1—1.2 cm. In the middle of each, there is a specially made hole measuring three by three. The outer diameter is 1.1 cm, and the inner diameter is 0.65 cm. Three lines are engraved on the outside of each round hole (fig. 4: 6—7 ).

Above it, there are bronze buckles on the right shoulder. There are seven pieces in total. It is divided into three groups. 1) The diameters of four large bronze buckles range from 3.7 to 3.9 cm. On the surface of the round buckles there are three circular lines located inside each other. They are surrounded by a square whose walls are curve d inwards. On the back, there is a part that attaches to the belt (fig. 4: 8 ). 2) Small oval-shaped buckles. The dimensions are 1.6 × 1.9 cm. There are no patterns on the surface (fig. 4: 9—10 ). 3) The main piece is a buckle featuring the head of the mythical bird Samruk. The bird’s beak is thick, with the head curved downward. The beak’s opening is clearly defined, and the eye is represented by two circles. The buckle is 4.5 cm long and 3.4 cm wide, with a thickness of 0.25 cm (fig. 4: 11 ).

A bronze knife, a grindstone and a bone awl were found on the left thigh. They are in their original place. The length of the bronze knife is 20.2 cm, the width is 1.4 cm, and the thickness is 0.5 cm. One side of the blade is sharpened. The tip of the blade is pointed. An image of an animal is carved on the head. The body and legs are clearly visible (fig. 4: 2 ).

The total length of the stone blade is 10.9 cm. A bronze hook is attached to the head of the stone. The shape of the stone is elongated-oval. The stone is 10.1 cm long, 3.6 cm width and 1.6 cm thick. The hook measures 3.2 × 2.5 cm (fig. 4: 4 ). The bone awl is 10.4 cm long, 1.3 cm wide, and 0.8 cm thick, with a pointed tip. The head is rectangular, featuring a round hole with a diameter of 0.5 cm.

№ 17. 2024

Additionally, three holes are located along the edges of the bone awl, with diameters ranging from 0.2 to 0.25 cm and depths from 0.1 to 0.2 cm (fig. 4: 3 ).

10 bronze arrowheads were found near the left knee of the deceased (fig. 4: 12—21 ). The arrowheads are two-vane and well-preserved. Their length ranges from 4.1 to 4.5 cm, and the width from 1.2 to 1.3 cm. The round notches have an outer diameter of 0.5 cm and an inner diameter of 0.4 cm. Notably, traces of gray-brown material, potentially decayed wood fragments, were found on the underside of the arrowheads. Due to severe damage, they could not be definitively identified.

Research results. Anthropological analysis revealed that the buried individual was a male, approximately 56—60 years old, with a height of 174 cm and a robust physique. According to the paleopathological feature, the place of the intravital fracture, healed before death, is over again (fi g. 5) .

It was determined that the man was frequently on horseback. The research, focusing on general paleopathological and traumatic markers, contributes to the anthropological data on the Early Saka period. Such a datab ase for the Early Saka has previously been established only in Central Kazakhstan (Beisenov et al. 2015). The study of dating issues was examined using only C14 radiocarbon dating results. According to the OxCal scale, the dating starts from the late 8th century BC and covers the period up to the mid-6th century BC (table 1).

Table 1. Radiocarbon dating indicators

Lab ID

Prov en an c e (monument)

14C ВР

Cal ibrated (1 σ , 68.3)

Cal ibrated (2 σ , 95.4)

FTMC-GP12-3R

Balykty b. mound 1

3040±29

8.7% 760—742 cal BC

12.4% 692—665 cal BC

47.2% 647—549 cal BC

94.2% 776—537 cal BC

1.3% 531—518 cal BC

It was determined that the grindstone was made of sandstone. Stone tools are usually made from soft raw materials, making them highly suitable for processing and sharp ening metal objects. It belongs to the ranks of 2—3 coefficients on the Mоos scale (Ananyev, Peredelsky 1980). Based on the function of the stone blade, it belongs to the type used for metal processing (Beisenov et al. 2021: 192, fig. 6—7 ).

It was established that the majority of the bronze items consist of 90% copper and a smaller proportion of tin. The corrosion-resistant properties of copper and tin allow these objects to be used for domestic purposes and preserved underground to this day (table 2).

Discussion. The northern part of Saryarka is considered an integral part of the early nomadic culture of the Eurasian steppes. The study of monuments from this period associated with Mir K. Kadyrbayev. In the 1960s, Kadyrbaev first explored the Tasmola kurgan group and conducted excavations. As a result, small burials dating to the 7th—5th centuries BC were studied. The term “Tasmola culture” appeared in the scientific literature, name d after the excavated sites. The researcher excavated numerous small burial monuments and raised questions about the initial dating of the Early Iron Age (Kadyrbayev 1966).

Small burials in Northern Saryarka are very poorly studied. In 1972—1975, excavations were carried out in Alipkash, Zhabay, Ulybay, Bektengiz and about 150 other small burials. Over 70 of these are dated to the 8th—5th centuries BC. Archaeologist Maral K. Khabdulina divided the monuments into the Petropavlovsk, Sergeevsk and Yesil-Shagalaly groups based on their regional locations (Khabdulina 1994: 19). Among these, we classify the Balykty burial site as part of the Yesil-Shagalaly group due to its geographical position (Khabdulina 2019).

At the end of the last century, scientific results were published on previously discovered monuments of the early Iron Age in Northern Saryarka (Khabdulina 1994). The Tasmola culture primarily represents the Early Saka culture, covering almost the entire territory of Saryarka.

№ 17. 2024

Subsequent changes to this unified archaeological culture, with Central Kazakhstan as the core, led to the division of northern Saryarka into archaeological microdistricts: “Ulybay-Tasmola” (Khabdulina 1994), and “Bobrov-Tasmola” in the south Urals. However, the authors note that the Tasmola culture is considered a single archaeological culture based on the archaeologic al sites and material complexes. Early Saka burial sites discovered in Central and Northern Kazakhstan are quite similar in all their components, proving there are no significant differences.

Table 2. Index of composition of metal products*

Conclusion

Ti (wt%)

Fe (wt%)

Co (wt%)

Ni (wt%)

Cu (wt%)

Zn (wt%)

As (wt%)

Ag (wt%)

Sn (wt%)

Sb (wt%)

Pb (wt%)

Bi (wt%)

SUM

1

Snbronze (with As)

0

0.2

0

0

87.5

0

0.5

0.1

10.7

0.1

0.9

0

100

2

Snbronze (with As)

0.1

0.1

0

0,1

91.2

0

0.5

0

8

0

0

0

100

3

Snbronze (with As)

0

0.1

0

0

91.4

0

0.6

0.1

7.7

0

0

0

100

4

Snbronze (with As)

0.1

0.1

0

0,2

85.4

0.1

1

0.1

13.1

0

0

0

100

5

Snbronze (with As)

0.1

0.3

0

0,1

87.7

0

0.8

0

11

0

0.1

0

100

6

Snbronze

0

0.5

0

0

95.2

0

0.1

0.1

4

0

0

0

100

7

Snbronze (with As)

0.1

0.1

0

0,2

86.6

0.1

1

0.1

11.8

0

0.1

0

100

8

Snbronze (with As)

0

0

0

0,1

87.8

0

0.8

0.1

11

0

0

0

100

9

Snbronze (with As)

0

0.1

0

0

82.9

0.1

0.8

0

15.4

0.1

0.5

0

100

10

Snbronze (with As)

0

0

0

0

86.1

0

0.8

0

12.4

0

0.5

0

100

11

Snbronze

0

0

0

0

89.2

0.1

0.3

0.1

10

0

0.3

0

100

12

Snbronze

0

0

0

0

92.9

0.1

0.2

0

6.7

0

0.2

0

100

13

Snbronze (low Sn)

0

0.1

0

0

98

0

0.3

0

1.4

0

0.1

0

100

14

Asbronze (Arsenical bronze)

0

0.6

0

0

97.6

0

1.4

0.1

0

0

0.3

0

100

15

Asbronze (Arsenical bronze)

0

0.4

0

0

97.3

0

1.4

0

0

0

0.7

0

100

16

Snbronze (with As)

0

0.1

0

0

93.1

0.1

0.3

0

5.8

0.3

0.3

0

100

17

Snbronze

0

0

0

0

91.2

0

0.1

0

7.7

0.1

0.8

0

100

18

Snbronze

0

0.1

0

0

92.1

0

0

0

6.9

0.1

0.8

0

100

19

Snbronze

0

0.1

0

0

92.1

0

0

0

6.9

0.1

0.8

0

100

20

Snbronze

0

0.1

0

0

92.2

0

0

0

6.8

0.1

0.8

0

100

21

Snbronze

0

0.1

0

0

92.1

0

0

0

6.9

0.1

0.8

0

100

Note: *The numbering in the table corresponds to the number in figure 4.

Over the past two decades, comprehensive studies of large and small burials have been carried out in Central Kazakhstan (Beisenov 2015b: 11). Similar research has recently expanded into Northern Saryarka. In particular, research efforts in recent years have prioritized elite burial monuments (Kassenali et al. 2021). Simple and small kurgans have been well studied. Excavations of small burial sites were carried out on the territory of the Kokshetau forestry or in adjacent areas. In particular, the burial grounds of Taskora II, Kasan I, Taitobe, Produksi II, Besoba (Valchak et al. 2017: 142), Ulkensor (Yarygin et al. 2023), Shagalaly 5 (Yarygin, Sakenov 2018) can be noted.

The excavation of the Balykty burial site is part of the scientific exploration of several Early Iron Age monuments in Northern Saryarka. The “warrior” burial sites in Northern Saryarka are poorly studied. Similar burials have been discovered at sites like Shagalaly 5 (Yarygin, Sakenov 2018), Ulkensor (Yarygin et al. 2023), Myrzhik 6 (Beisenov, Duisenbay 2017). These sites are located within

№ 17. 2024

the historical-geographical area of Saryarka and, chronologically, belong to the Tasmola culture. In agreement with Maral K. Khabdulina, who categorized kurgans into three types based on size, this burial belongs to the first type (Khabdulina 1994: 18).

In addition to the discovered artifacts, the deceased may have originally possessed belt sets, which were removed during the looting. Based on the looted grave and the absence of lumbar and rib bones, it appears that there were initially items related to the waist. This suggests that the deceased was buried according to ancient customs. This is confirmed by fragments of a belt from the village of Ulkensor in the Burabay district, which is closest to the cemetery. The discovery of a stone axe, a knife, and several bronze arrowheads from a burial dated to the 7th—6th centuries BC (Yarygin et al., 2023) suggests similarities in burial practices with the Balykty ritual. Additionally, one can mention the material s from the Myrzhyk 6 burial ground in Atasu (Beisenov, Duisenbay 2017: 18— 25). However, the construction of the object and type of the items complex dates back to a much earlier period than the sites mentioned above. This is further evidenced by the results of radiocarbon research.

The plaques from bridle straps belong to the c lassification group of bronze buckles of the pre-Scythian and early Scythian eras, examined by Alexey I. Terenozhkin. The set includes more than 200 buckles of the solar-type. Motifs with a “rhombus-shaped fig ure with concave sides and a circle in the center” are widespread. An important feature of the motif is the absence of intersections between the rhombus and the circle inscribed in the figure (Ryabkova 2010: 309; Beisenov et al. 2017; Jumabekova, Bazarbayeva 2018). Tatyana V. Ryabkova concluded that the origin of the four-pointed motifs from the steppe zone and the Near East was also used in Central Asia. The researcher’s hypothesis is initially deemed unfounded due to the significant time gap and the differences in burial rites and material heritage between the Okunev and Scythian cultures (Ryabkova 2011: 104—106; Horvat 2021: 145). Earlier, Alex ey I. Terenozhkin noted the borrowing of rhombic symbols from Western Asia, but did not highlight the differences in the shape of the Signs that were widespread in the steppe regions. At the same time, he did not exclude that the rhombic images could have come from the depths of Siberia, where many other types of horse equipment of the late pre-Scythian period originated (Horvat 2021).

A close analogy to the bronze knife can be found in the bronze knife from the Shagalaly 5 kurgan, discovered in the Zerendy district. It is single-edged and very similar in shape and size (Yarygin, Sakenov 2018: 27).

Bronze daggers became widespread in the early Iron Age during the 8th—7th centuries BC (Khabdulina 2017). The dagger is one of the main attributes of the Saka warrior. Analogs of the bronze dagger from the site were found in the Marinskoye settlement near Kokshetau, along the Yesil River, near the Rassvet village. It is dated to the 7th—6th centuries BC. The dagger found near Rassvet village is similar in shape and size to the dagger of the Balykty burial ground. It differs only in the ab sence of an animal image embossed with the style of the beast on the head (Khabdulina 1984: 228). The bronze dagg er can be classified as one of the characteristic material complexes of the Saryarka region. Typologically, the earliest akinak daggers with a crosshair “mustache”, such as those found in the Arzhan-1 mound (Savinov 2018: fig. 1, 5, 8), as well as in the form of random finds in the Minusinsk Basin and Tuva, reproduce the shape of Chinese daggers of the era Western Zhou, with the same guard “mustache”, where they, in turn, had deeper antiquity (Savinov 2018: 95, fig. 1: 5, 8, 10, 11 ).

The closest type of bits was found in ritual structure No. 5 of the Bakybulak burial ground (Beisenov 2015b: 31). Similar materials were found in ritual structure No. 1 at Bakybulak, where bits and bridles were found together. The difference is that the Bakybulak bits have one central groove in an elongated form, whereas the Balykty bits feature three grooves. However, in terms of tradition and manufacturing technique, they are most similar to the Bakybulak finds . The metallurgical analysis of artifacts from Bakybulak revealed that they were cast using the Arzhan-Chernogorsk method

№ 17. 2024

(Beisenov 2015a: 121). Another similar type of bit was found in 24 burials in Tolagai and Tasmola 1 (Kadyrbayev 1966: 316).

Another find of Early Iron Age bits comes from the Akzhailau-1 burial ground. The bronze two-part components, joined by two rings positioned on links in perpendicular planes, are dated to the 7th—6th centuries BC. The outer ends of the bits are somewhat squared (Samashev et al. 2023: 18).

The material complexes of the central and northern part of the Tasmola culture are very similar to each other. Although local cultural differences are examined separately, the ancient inhabitants shared a common lifestyle in a generally accepted sense.

Collecting and analyzing material complexes related to the Ulybai-Tasmola culture deepens our understanding of the Saka people’s culture and worldview. The presence of arrows with different types of arrowheads indicates a high degree of military activity during that period (Khabdulina 2017: 50). The closest analogues for these double-edged arrowheads are found in the Alypkash burial site (Khabdulina 2017: 41).

Forty-two arrowheads from the Bakibulak burial ground (Beisenov 2015а: 121, fig- 2: 11—21 ) are categorized into four groups. Among them are ten two-bladed arrows, similar to those found at Balykty. The presence of 149 arrowheads from the Saba burial ground, located in the Torgay Basin, suggests that the site served as a warrior’s burial place (Onggaruly et al. 2020: 240).

The presence of warrior burials confirms the special regard for them and their high status within the social stratification of the Tasmola culture. Compared to the study of large “royal” kurgans, targeted research on common graves provides substantial information about the social structure of Saka society.

Conclusion . The role of material complexes in addressing the issues of paleo -economics within the Tasmola culture and mutual cultural integration is significantly high. The diversity of high-quality metal, stone, and bone artifacts, including elements of jewelry, indicates a sophisticated culture among the ancient inhabitants of the region.

As a result of comprehensive archaeological studies at the Balykty site, new materials have emerged regarding the formation of the cultural complex of the Early Iron Age in northern Saryarka. C14 analysis shows that the site dates to the first half of the 8th century BC to the second half of the 6th century BC. Considering that solar symbols identified on the surface of bronze plaques and daggers find analogies in material s from the early Scythian period, the obtained materials logically fit within the interval from the end of the 8th century BC to the beginning of the 6th century BC. Furthermore, the presence of bronze two-bladed arrows with sockets indicates that they are characteristic of the early phase of the Early Iron Age. Based on the above, the site is dated to the end of the 8th century BC to the second half of the 7th century BC.

Targeted studies of common burials in the future will provide a new impetus for addressing key issues of the Early Iron Age in the region. Until recently, archaeological research on relevant issues from this era has often relied on data obtained from excavations of large burials. For instance, it has been found that stone anthropomorphic figurines are encountered during the study of the aboveground parts of «royal» kurgans (Beisenov et al. 2023: 18), whereas they appear only rarely in the context of common burials (Kasenova et al. 2023).

The high status of warriors in the society of the Tasmola culture in northern Saryarka is defined by the complexity of the accompanying items within the burial complex. The presence of warriors in the social hierarchy is viewed as a characteristic of an early state society.

Список литературы “Warrior” kurgan of Tasmola culture at the Balykty burial ground

  • Alekseyev, V.P. 1966. Osteometriya. Metodika antropologicheskikh issledovaniy (Osteometriya. Methods of anthropological research). Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
  • Alekseyev, V.P., Debets, G.F. 1964. Kraniometriya. Metodika antropologicheskikh issledovaniy (Craniometry. Methodology of anthropological research). Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
  • Anan’yev, V.P., Peredelskiy, L.V. 1980. Inzhenernaya geologiya i gidrogeologiya (Engineering geology and hydrogeology) Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
  • Beisenov 2015a: Beisenov, A.Z. 2015. Pamyatniki rannego etapa tasmolinskoj kul’tury (Monuments of the early stage of the Tasmola culture). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Tomsk State University) 3 (54), 119—126 (in Russian).
  • Beisenov 2015b: Beisenov, A.Z. 2015. Poseleniya i mogil’niki sakskoj epohi Тсentral’nogo Kazahstana (Settlements and burial grounds of the Saka era in Central Kazakhstan). In: Beisenov, A.Z. (ed.). Sakskaya kultura Saryarki v kontekste izucheniya etnosotsiokulturnykh protsessov stepnoy Evrazii (Saka culture of Saryarka in the context of studying ethnosociocultural processes of steppe Eurasia). Karaganda: Scientic research center for Archaeology and History “Begazy-Tasmola”; Margulan Institute of Archaeology, 11— 38 (in Russian).
  • Beisenov et al. 2021: Beisenov, A.Z., Gorashchuk, I.V., Duisenbay, D.B. 2021. Traceological Study of Stone Tools in the Settlement of Saka Time Abilay, Central Kazakhstan. Povolzhskaya arkheologiya (The Volga river region Archaeology) 3 (37), 182—200 (in Russian).
  • Beisenov et al. 2017: Beіsenov, A.Z., Duіsenbay, D.B. 2017. Voinskoe pogrebenie tasmolinskoj kul’tury na reke Atasu (Warrior burial of the Tasmola culture on the Atasu River). In: Kulikov, F.I. (ed.). Istoriya i kultura narodov Yugo-Zapadnoy Sibiri i sopredelnykh regionov (Kazakhstan, Mongoliya, Kitay) (History and culture of the peoples of South-Western Siberia and adjacent regions (Kazakhstan, Mongolia, China)).
  • Gorno-Altaysk: Gorno-Altajskij gosudarstvennyj universitet Gorno-Altayskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet — Gorno-Altai State University, 18—25. (in Russian).
  • Beisenov et al. 2015: Beisenov, A.Z., Ismagulova, A.O., Kitov, E.P., Kitova, A.O. 2015. Naseleniye Tsentralnogo Kazakhstana v I tys. do n.уe. (Population of Central Kazakhstan in the 1st millennium BC). Almaty: Margulan Institute of Archaeology (in Russian).
  • Beisenov et al. 2017: Beisenov, A.Z., Jumabekova, G.S., Bazarbayeva, G.A., Duisenbaу, D.B., Akhiyarov, I.K. 2017. Vihrevye kompozitsii v iskusstve sakov Tsentralnogo Kazahstana (Vortex compositions in the art of the Saks of Central Kazakhstan). ADIU (Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine) 2 (23), 40—58 (in Russian).
  • Beisenov et al. 2023: Beisenov, A., Panichkin, A., Shashenov, D. 2023. Zheleznyi topor iz tasmolinskogo kurgana mogilnika Kyzylzhartas: rezultaty metallogra􀁒cheskogo i himicheskogo analizov (Iron axe head from the tasmola culture barrow in the Qyzylzhartas burial ground: results of metallographic and chemical analysis). Materialy po Arkheologii i Istorii Antichnogo i Srednevekovogo Prichernomor’ya (Proceedings in Archaeology and History of Ancient and Medieval Black Sea Region) 15, 102—120 (in Russian).
  • Duisenbay et al. 2024: Duisenbay, D.B., Kassenali, A.Y., Ukeev, Z.T., Umitkaliyev, U.U., Mussyrmankul, P.B. 2024. Tasmola mаdeníetínín Balykty kоlí manyndagy zhauyngerlík korymy (Warrior burial of the Tasmola culture at Lake Balykty). Turkic Studies Journal 1 (6), 23—39 (in Kazakh).
  • Horvath, V. 2021. Bronzovye uzdechnye raspredeliteli remnej iz mogil’nika u s. Batina (Kishkyoseg),
  • Zapadnaya Horvatiya. K voprosu rasprostraneniya i hronologii detalej konskogo ubora i vooruzheniya, ukrashennyh solyarnym znakom vo vtoroj polovine VIII — pervoj polovine VI v. do n. e. (Bronze bridle strap distributors from the cemetery near Batina (Kiškőszeg), Western Croatia. On the distribution and chronology of horse harness and weaponry components decorated with a solar sign in the second half of the 8th — 􀁒rst half of the 6th century BC). In Materialy i issledovaniya po arkheologii Severnogo Kavkaza (Materials and research on the archeology of the North Caucasus) 19, 141—166 (in Russian).
  • Jumabekova, G.S., Bazarbayeva, G.A. 2018. Illyustratsiya k eposu ob Alpamyse i nekotorye paralleli syuzhetu v iskusstve drevnih kochevnikov: k izucheniyu semantiki vihrevyh kompozitsiy (Illustration to the epose about Alpamys and some parallels to the fable in the art of ancient nomads: to the studying the semantics of vortex compositions). Kazakstan arheologiyasy (Kazakhstan Archeology) 1—2, 107—117 (in Russian).
  • Kadyrbayev, M.K. 1966. Pamyatniki tasmolinskoy kultury (Monuments of Tasmolа culture). In: Margulan, A.K, Akishev, K.A., Kadyrbayev, M.K., Orazbayev, A.M. Drevnyaya kultura Tsentralnogo Kazahstana (Ancient culture of Central Kazakhstan). Alma-Ata: Nauka, 303—433 (in Russian).
  • Kasenova et al. 2023: Kasenova, A.D., Amirov, Y.S., Ermolenko, L.N., Utubayev, Z.R. 2023. Arheologicheskie raskopki na komplekse Karatal v Ulytau (Archaeological excavations at the Karatal complex in Ulytau). Kazakstan arheologiyasy (Kazakhstan Archeology) 3 (21), 111—124 (in Russian).
  • Kassenalin et al. 2021: Kassenalin, A.Y., Yessen, S.G., Tleugabilov, D.T., Ardabi, M. 2021. Akmola onírínín madeni muralary: zhana zertteuler (Cultural heritage of the Akmola region: new research). Kоkshetau: Akmola Regional Local History Museum (in Kazakh).
  • Khabdulina, M.K. 1984. Kinzhal rannesakskogo vremeni iz Petropavlovskogo Priishim’ya (Early Saka period dagger from Petropavl Priishim). Drevnosti Yevrazii v skifo-sarmatskoye vremya (Antiquities of Eurasia in Scythian-Sarmatian times). Moscow: Nauka, 227—232 (in Russian).
  • Khabdulina, M.K. 1994. Stepnoye Priishim’ye v epokhu rannego zheleza (Steppe Priishim in the Early Iron Age). Almaty: Rakurs (in Russian).
  • Khabdulina, M.K. 2017. Itogi izucheniya ulubaj-tasmolinskoj kul’tury severnoj Saryarki (Results of the study of the Ulubay-Tasmola culture of northern Saryarka). In: Beisenov, A.Z. (ed.). Kazakhstan v sakskuyu epokhu (Kazakhstan in the Saka era). Almaty: Margulan Institute archaeology, 35—59 (in Russian).
  • Khabdulina, M.K. 2019. Novoe v izuchenii Tasmolinskoj arheologicheskoj kul’tury Saryarki (New in the study of the Tasmola archaeological culture of Saryarka). Turkic Studies Journal. 2 (1), 21—33. (in Russian).
  • Onggaruly et al. 2020: Onggaruly, A., Kairmagambetov, A.M., Nuskabay, A.A., Rakhimzhanova, S.Z. 2020. Kurgan voennoj elity Torgaya (Mound of the military elite of Torgay). Povolzhskaya arkheologiya (The Volga river region Archaeology) 3 (33), 233—247 (in Russian).
  • Povarennykh, A.S. 1963. Tvyordost’ mineralov (Hardness of minerals). Kyiv: Ukrainian SSR Academy of Sciences (in Russian).
  • Ryabkova, T.V. 2010. Klassi􀁒kaciya izobrazhenij s rombovidnymi znakami na predmetah predskifskogo i ranneskifskogo vremeni (Classi􀁒cation of images with diamond-shaped signs on objects of pre-Scythian and early Scythian times). In: Muzhukhoyev, M.Y. (ed.). XXVI Krupnovskiye chteniya (26th Krupnov Readings). Magas: Piligrim, 309—312 (in Russian).
  • Ryabkova T.V. 2011. Pamirskaya I, kurgan 10: obosnovanie rannej hronologicheskoj pozicii kompleksa (Pamirskaya I, mound 10: substantiation of the early chronological position of the complex). In: Khabdulina, M.K. (ed.). Margulanovskiye chteniya—2011 (Margulan Readings—2011). Astana: Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 104—109 (in Russian).
  • Samashev et al. 2023: Samashev, Z.S., Chotbayev, A.Y., Besetayev, B.B. 2023. Novye dannye o snaryazhenii loshadi rannesakskogo vremeni (po materialam kurgana № 1 mogilnika Akzhailau, Vostochnyi Kazahstan) (New data on the horse equipment of the early Saka period (based on the materials of the burial mound no. 1 of the Akzhailau burial ground, East Kazakhstan)). Kazakstan arheologiyasy (Kazakhstan Archeology) 2 (20), 9—29 (in Russian).
  • Savinov, D. G. 2018. K teorii obrazovaniya skifo-sibirskogo kul’turnogo prostranstva (Towards the theory of formation of the Scythian-Siberian cultural space). Zapiski instituta istorii materialnoy kultury RAN (Notes of the Institute for the History of Material Culture RAS) 19, 91—102 (in Russian).
  • Valchak et al. 2017: Valchak, S.B., Demidenko, S.V., Malashev, V.Y., Sakenov, S.K., Sviridov, A.N., Yarygin, S.A. 2017. Novye rannesakskie pogrebeniya iz Severnogo Kazahstana (New Early Saka burials from Northern Kazakhstan). Rossiyskaya arkheologiya (Russian archaeology). 4, 142—154 (in Russian).
  • Yarygin, S.A., Sakenov, S.S. 2021. Rannesakskoe pogrebenie kurgana Shagalaly V (Early Saka burial of Shagalaly V mound). In: Onggaruly, A. et al. (eds.). Margulanovskiye chteniya—2021: (Margulan readings—2021). In 3 vol. Vol. 1. Almaty: Margulan Institute of Archaeology, 23—28 (in Russian).
  • Yarygin et al. 2023: Yarygin, S.A., Sakenov, S.S., Mysyr, O. 2023. Kurgan rannesakskogo vremeni Ulkensor (The early Saka period burial mound Ulkensor). Povolzhskaya arkheologiya (The Volga river region Archaeology) 1 (43), 127—140 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная