Ways to reduce social inequality

Автор: Leonidova Galina V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Scientific reviews

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

In the context of new geopolitical, financial, economic and epidemiological challenges, the issues of ensuring a decent standard of living and quality of life for the Russian population are still a priority in Russia’s domestic policy. The relevance of this problem arouses scientific interest, which is confirmed by the publication of more than fifteen monographic studies over the past five years. The article analyzes the findings of a study published in 2022 in the monograph Standard of Living and Quality of Life of the Russian Population: From Reality to Designing the Future, prepared by a team of authors and edited by V.N. Bobkov, N.V Loktyukhina, E.F. Shamaeva. The authors of the book - economists, sociologists, specialists in the field of medicine, environmental protection and labor law - presented the results of four years of studying the components, social standards and indicators of the standard of living and quality of life in modern Russia, their qualitative identification and quantitative assessment in the context of excessive socio-economic inequality. The main advantage of the monograph is an interdisciplinary approach to studying the quality of life, which allows for a comprehensive analysis of this indicator of the state of society from the standpoint of economic, social and legal relations. The article notes the structuring of the material, the sequence of its presentation - from theory to methodology and practical recommendations, brevity and accuracy of judgments about the categories under consideration, and a clear perspective of the authors. The novelty of the proposed publication is due to the fact that it investigates new tools of governmental and corporate policy to regulate the standard of living and quality of life, in particular, the presentation of the authors’ concept of a medium-term national program to reduce absolute monetary poverty. These tools are becoming an important step toward reducing social inequality. In practice, this is “designing the future”, as the authors put it, and this is what provides the monograph with both scientific and practical significance.

Еще

Quality of life, standard of living, population, precarious employment, unconditional basic income, concept of a medium-term national program to reduce absolute monetary poverty

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147240788

ID: 147240788   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.2.86.12

Список литературы Ways to reduce social inequality

  • Aivazyan S.A. (2012). Analiz kachestva i obraza zhizni naseleniya [Analysis of the Quality and Lifestyle of the Population]. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Ashmarov I.A. (2018). “Working poor” in modern Russia. Istoriko-ekonomicheskie issledovaniya=Journal of Economic History and History of Economics, 4, 556–570. DOI: 10.17150/2308-2588.2018.19(4).556-570 (in Russian).
  • Bobkov V.N., Bobkova T.E. et al. (2022). Uroven’ i kachestvo zhizni naseleniya Rossii: ot real’nosti k proektirovaniyu budushchego [Standard of Living and Quality of Life of the Russian Population: From Reality to Designing the Future: Monograph]. Moscow: FCTAS RAS.
  • Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V. (2020а). Influence of precarious employment on household well-being. Sotsial’no-trudovye issledovaniya=Social and Labor Research, 39(2), 30–41. DOI: 10.34022/2658-3712-2020-39-2-30-41 (in Russian).
  • Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V. (2020b). Low level and quality of life among economically active population: Identification criteria and assessment of occurrence. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(5), 168–181 (in Russian).
  • Cook D. (2020). The freedom trap: Digital nomads and the use of disciplining practices to manage work/leisure boundaries. Information Technology & Tourism, 22, 355–390.
  • Cummins R.A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52(1), 55–72.
  • Degryse C. (2017). Sharing the old of work in the digital economy. SSRN Electronic Journal. Brussels: ETUI.
  • Gontmakher E.Sh. (2019). Universal basic income: The political economic aspect. Ekonomicheskaya politika=Economic Policy, 14(3), 70–79. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2019-3-70-79 (in Russian).
  • Gruzdeva M.A. (2022). The age factor in the digital divide: The edges of inequality. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(4), 228–241. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.4.82.14 (in Russian).
  • Kislitsyna O.A. (2019). Introduction of the unconditional basic income system: What do Russians think about it? Who is for, who is against? Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki RAN=The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the RAS, 3, 32–47 (in Russian).
  • Leonidova G.V., Basova E.A. (2020). The region’s social policy and the “working poor’s” problems in the context of the working life quality. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 3(107), 7–26. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2020.3.107.1 (in Russian).
  • Leonidova G.V., Ivanovskaya A.L. (2021). Working conditions as a factor of increasing its productivity in Russia’s regions. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 14(3), 118–134. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.3.75.7 (in Russian).
  • Leonidova G.V., Rossoshanskaya E.A. (2018). Precarious employment as a barrier to effective implementation of employment potential. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 1(93), 7–21. DOI: 10.15838/ptd/2018.2.93.1 (in Russian).
  • Mandl I., Curtarelli M., Riso S. et al. (2015). New Forms of Employment. Eurofound. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Popov A.V., Soloveva T.S. (2020). Employment precarization: Discussion on the essence and ways of measuring. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 9, 103–113. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009618-2 (in Russian).
  • Popov A.V., Soloveva T.S. (2021). Prekarizatsiya zanyatosti: ugrozy destabilizatsii polozheniya rabotnikov dlya razvitiya Rossii: monografiya [Employment Precarization: Threats to the Destabilization of Workers for Russia’s Development: A Monograph]. Vologda: VolRC RAS.
  • Rossoshanskii A.I. (2019). Kachestvo zhizni naseleniya: voprosy otsenki i instrumenty povysheniya [Quality of Life: Assessment Issues and Tools for Improvement]. Vologda: VolRC RAS.
  • Rossoshanskii A.I., Chekmareva E.A. (2016). Current state and development of the theory and the method to study quality of life of the population. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 1(81), 145–159 (in Russian).
  • Ruževičius J., Akranavičiūtė D. (2007). Quality of life and its components measurement. Engineering Akranavičiūtė Economics, 2, 43–48.
  • Ryabushkin N.N., Kapelyuk S.D. (2020). The working poor in Russia: Assessment of the size of the problem. Ekonomika truda=Labor Economics, 7(6), 489–498. DOI: 10.18334/et.7.6.110529 (in Russian).
  • Salnikova I.N. (2007). Quality of employment – desirable and actual. Chelovek i trud, 6, 76–78 (in Russian).
  • Schalock R.L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: What we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(3), 203–216.
  • Sushko V.A (2018). Quality of life of the population of Russia in the 21st century: Prosperous years (2002–2012). Review of the monograph by Yu.P. Averin. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 18: Sotsiologiya i politologiya=Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 24(3), 189–204. DOI: 10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-3-189-204 (in Russian).
  • Tanner М. (2015). The pros and cons of a guaranteed national income. Policy Analysis. CATO Institute, 773. Available at: object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/fi les/pubs/pdf/pa773.pdf
  • Toshchenko Zh.T. (2019). The precariat phenomenon: Theoretical and methodological premises of its study. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 9, 51–63. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006669-8(55) (in Russian).
  • Veredyuk O.V. (2018). Quality of youth employment in Russia: Analysis of job satisfaction assessments. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 3, 306–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.3.16 (in Russian).
  • Zubarevich N.V. (2007). Sotsial’noe razvitie regionov Rossii: problemy i tendentsii perekhodnogo perioda [Social Development of Russian Regions: Problems and Trends in the Transition Period]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo LKI.
Еще
Рецензия