Youth involvement in digital civic activism: from online encounter to participation
Автор: Abramova Sofya B., Antonova Natalya L.
Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en
Рубрика: Social and economic development
Статья в выпуске: 2 т.16, 2023 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The involvement of the younger generation in civic participation practices is a relevant task for youth policy actors and public activists. The digital environment not only expands the forms and directions of civic activism, but also designs new mobilization mechanisms. Network communities have a high involvement potential, but they exist in a saturated information flow. Therefore, it is important to understand how users encounter messages on socially significant issues and initiatives to address them, and how they react to them (“input level”: coming across an offer to participate in a civic project); and whether this experience affects the intensity of involvement in real practices of digital civic activism (“output level”: reacting in the form of participation/non-participation in the project). The article is based on the results of an online survey of young residents of the Sverdlovsk Oblast (n = 1150). The sample population includes students and working youth. According to the results of cluster analysis, we propose a typology of models showing how young people encounter the content about civic initiatives; we identify and describe three types: involved, superficial and scrolling readers. We provide a classification of resources that young citizens are subscribed to, in terms of their connection with issues of civic activism; we also reveal that subscriptions to specialized resources are closely connected with the typology of encountering this type of content. We reveal how young people react when they come across civic messages, and find out that they mostly show denying and interested reactions, while the amount of supportive and active responses is negligible. We build a typology of digital participation based on assessing the intensity of involvement. The share of those highly involved in the information field and real practices is 5%; the majority of respondents belong to the medium-active and low-active participants in civic activism.
Civic activism, youth, digital activism, engagement, mobilization of participation, factors promoting attractiveness of the content
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147240785
IDR: 147240785 | DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.2.86.8
Список литературы Youth involvement in digital civic activism: from online encounter to participation
- Adler R.P., Goggin J. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement”? Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236–253. DOI: 10.1177/1541344605276792
- Afouxenidis A. (2014). Social media and political participation: An investigation of small scale activism in Greece. Advances in Applied Sociology, 4, 1–4. DOI: 10.4236/aasoci.2014.41001
- Azarov A.A., Brodovskaya E.V., Shatilov A.B. (2021). Civic activism of Russian youth in the digital environment as a predictor of offline activity: Results of a population survey and multi-agent modeling. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 6, 296–318. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2041 (in Russian).
- Barrett M., Pachi D. (2019). Social and demographic factors linked to youth civic and political engagement. In: Barrett M., Pachi D. Youth Civic and Political Engagement. DOI: 10.4324/9780429025570
- Boulianne S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication and Society, 18(5), 524–538. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
- Brandtzaeg P. B. (2017). Facebook is no “Great equalizer”: A big data approach to gender differences in civic engagement across countries. Social Science Computer Review, 35(1), 103–125. DOI: 10.1177/089443931560580
- Castells M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dahlgren P. (2009). Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Diehl J.A., Chan I.S.L. (2021). Is it just apathy? Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand young adults’ (18 to 35 years old) response to government efforts to increase planning participation in Singapore. Urban Governance, 1(2), 89–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ugj.2021.12.005
- Dombrovskaya A.Yu. (2020). Civil activism of youth in modern Russia: Features of its manifestation in online and offline environments (based on the results of an empirical study). Vlast’=The Authority, 28(2), 51–58. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v28i2.7134 (in Russian).
- Ekman J., Amnå E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 283–300. DOI: 10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
- Gerbaudo P. (2012). Tweets and the Streets. Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press.
- Giddens A., Sutton Ph. (2018). Osnovnye ponyatiya v sotsiologii [Essential Concepts in Sociology]. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki.
- Gureeva A.N., Dunas D.V., Muronec O.V. (2020). Social media and politics: Reinterpretating the nature of youth political participation. Mediaskop=Mediascope, 3. DOI: 10.30547/mediascope.3.2020.1 (in Russian).
- Hashagen S. (2002). Models of Community Engagement. Glasgow: Scottish Community Development Centre.
- Hine Ch. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury.
- Istyagina-Yeliseeva E.A., Barijenikova E.E., Boldyreva A.V. (2020). Involvement of Russian student youth in Internet communications as a factor in the formation of models of their socio-political activity. Tsifrovaya sotsiologiya=Digital Sociology, 3(3), 12–20. DOI: 10.26425/2658-347X-2020-3-3-12-20 (in Russian).
- Madison N., Klang M. (2020). The case for digital activism: Refuting the fallacies of slacktivism. Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(2), 28–47. DOI: 10.33621/jdsr.v2i2.25
- Milan S., Barbosa S. (2020). Enter the WhatsApper: Reinventing digital activism at the time of chat apps. First Monday, 25(12). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v25i12.10414
- Moran L., Brady B., Forkan C., Coen L. (2018). “Individual and connected”: An exploration of young people’s discourses about youth cafes in Ireland. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(8), 1127–1139. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2018.1441981
- Odintsov A.V. (2020). Activism resource of local associations of the Volgograd Oblast. Sotsiodinamika=Sociodynamics, 4, 11–23. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2020.4.32528 (in Russian).
- Parma R.V. (2021). Public activism of Russian citizens in offline and online spaces. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 6, 145–170. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2042 (in Russian).
- Saburova L.A., Blagodatsky G.A., Stazhilov V.V., Vantrusov P.V. (2021). Factors of social mobilization in internet communities. Vestnik PNIPU. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki=PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin, 3, 156–170. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9354/2021.3.11 (in Russian).
- Salganova E.I., Osipova L.B. (2023). Students’ digital literacy: Competence-based approach. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(1), 227–240. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.1.85.12 (in Russian).
- Schradie J. (2018). The digital activism gap: How class and costs shape online collective action. Social Problems, 65(1), 51–74. DOI: 10.1093/socpro/spx042
- Shaigerova L.A., Shilko R.S., Vakhantseva O.V. (2022). Cultural mediation of the identity of the digital generation: Perspectives on the analysis of internet activity and social media. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya=Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2, 73–107. DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2022.02.04 (in Russian).
- Shkurin D.V. (2015). Comparative evaluation of data quality of online and offline surveys. Diskussiya=Discussion, 8, 101–105 (in Russian).
- Soldatova G.U., Nestik T.A., Rasskazova E.I. (2017). Tsifrovoe pokolenie Rossii: kompetentnost’ i bezopasnost’ [Russia’s Digital Generation: Competence and Security]. Moscow: Smysl.
- Surkova I.Yu., Shcheblanova V.V., Loginova L.V. (2020). Youth civic activism in the Saratov Oblast: Socio-political inclusion and participation potential. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 8, 90–100. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009485-6 (in Russian).
- Sztompka P. (2005). Sotsiologiya. Analiz sovremennogo obshchestva [Sociology. Analysis of Modern Society]. Moscow: Logos.
- Vissers S., Stolle D. (2014). The internet and new modes of political participation: Online versus offline participation. Information, Communication and Society, 17(8), 937–955. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.867356
- Zemnukhova L.V. (2021). The elusive civic activism: From political protest to non-political activities. Sotsiodigger, 2, 3(8), 65–69. Available at: https://sociodigger.ru/3d-flip-book/2021vol2-8/ (accessed: March 18, 2023; in Russian).
