Replacing an incorrect answer in civil and administrative court proceedings

The relevance of the chosen topic is manifested in the desire of the legislator to change some procedural norms to endow administrative proceedings with specific features peculiar only to him. Specifically, we are considering a comparison of such an important procedural norm as the replacement of an inappropriate defendant in civil and administrative proceedings. Such an innovation as the appointment of a second administrative defendant by the court in the absence of the plaintiff's consent gives rise to wide discussions in scientific circles. Comparison of the selected norm will be carried out through the prism of fundamental principles - principles.