Prohibition of certain actions as an alternative to conclusion

The article analyzes the preventive measure in the form of a ban on certain actions, namely: to go out at certain periods of time outside the premises; to be in certain places, as well as closer than the established distance to certain objects, attend certain events and participate in them, communicate with certain persons, send and receive postal and telegraph dispatches, use communication facilities and the Internet information and telecommunications network; drive a car or other vehicle if the crime committed is related to violation of traffic rules and operation of vehicles. The prohibition of certain actions is compared with other preventive measures. Analyzes the data of judicial statistics, on the basis of which it is concluded that the new measure of restraint did not become a real alternative to detention. A comparative analysis of the prohibition of certain actions under the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and similar preventive measures under the laws of individual foreign countries is carried out. Based on the study, the author suggests ways to improve the preventive measure in the form of a ban on certain actions. As a result, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to improve the studied norms.