A Concept Review on MOOCs Research Findings – A Qualitative Approach

Автор: Salah Al Khafaji, Sriram. B.

Журнал: International Journal of Education and Management Engineering @ijeme

Статья в выпуске: 4 vol.13, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) platforms play a vital role nowadays in knowledge creation and enhancement. Though, initially these programs and courses were offered freely, now due to emergence of technology and requirement, they were offered in both free and paid mode. Currently, the MOOCs provide various programs and courses that are administered by various international higher education institutions and private organizations. Moreover, the COVID – 19 has triggered all the universities, colleges and institutions to move towards MOOC platforms as an online learning method. The students used these MOOC platforms to gain and enhance required knowledge in this competitive world. Due to this emergence, various research studies were conducted during the past years using different research methodologies and scopes to identify the usage, gaps, trends, advantages, disadvantages and user satisfactions. This paper reviews some major researches since 2010 and summarizes the findings to support future research scopes. The 16 research articles that were having more than 100 Google citation counts were considered for this study and analyzed. Currently, the number of students joining and completing the courses through online is significantly increased which showed that the learners’ intention on getting the knowledge in the area of specialization has increased. Moreover, the acceptance and recognition of online courses and programs by various employers and institutions have been increase which opens a great opportunities for continuous and life-long learnings. Though, the completion rates of courses and programs thorough online platforms are increased comparatively now-a-days, the success rates, knowledge acquisition rates, actual participation rates and learning outcome attainment rates need to be studied in depth.

Еще

MOOCs, online courses, research findings, online learning, educational technology

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15018667

IDR: 15018667   |   DOI: 10.5815/ijeme.2023.04.03

Список литературы A Concept Review on MOOCs Research Findings – A Qualitative Approach

  • Leinonen, T., Vadén, T., & Suoranta, J. (2009). Learning in and with an open wiki project: Wikiversity’s potential in global capacity building. First Monday, 14(2).
  • Baturay. M.H. (2015). An Overview of the World of MOOCs. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 174. Pp: 427 – 433.
  • Pappano. L., (2012). The Year of MOOC. The New York Times. Massive Open Online Courses Are Multiplying at a Rapid Pace. 2(12).
  • Baggaley, J. (2013). MOOC rampant. Distance education, 34(3), 368-378.
  • Voudoukis, N. and Pagiatakis, G., 2022. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Practices, Trends, and Challenges for the Higher Education. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(3), pp.288-295.
  • Zhu, M., Sari, A.R. and Lee, M.M., 2020. A comprehensive systematic review of MOOC research: Research techniques, topics, and trends from 2009 to 2019. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), pp.1685-1710.
  • Ma, L. and Lee, C.S., 2019. Investigating the adoption of MOOC s: A technology–user–environment perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(1), pp.89-98.
  • Ma, L. and Lee, C.S., 2019. Understanding the barriers to the use of MOOCs in a developing country: An innovation resistance perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(3), pp.571-590.
  • Al-Imarah, A.A. and Shields, R., 2019. MOOCs, disruptive innovation and the future of higher education: A conceptual analysis. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), pp.258-269.
  • Handoko, E., Gronseth, S.L., McNeil, S.G., Bonk, C.J. and Robin, B.R., 2019. Goal setting and MOOC completion: A study on the role of self-regulated learning in student performance in massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3).
  • Henderikx, M., Kreijns, K., Castano Munoz, J. and Kalz, M., 2019. Factors influencing the pursuit of personal learning goals in MOOCs. Distance Education, 40(2), pp.187-204.
  • Rizvi, S., Rienties, B., Rogaten, J. and Kizilcec, R.F., 2020. Investigating variation in learning processes in a FutureLearn MOOC. Journal of computing in higher education, 32(1), pp.162-181.
  • Arpaci, I., Al-Emran, M. and Al-Sharafi, M.A., 2020. The impact of knowledge management practices on the acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) by engineering students: A cross-cultural comparison. Telematics and informatics, 54, p.101468.
  • Gaebel, M., Zhang, T., Stoeber, H. and Morrisroe, A., 2021. Digitally enhanced learning and teaching in European higher education institutions. Geneve (Switzerland).
  • Mackness, J., Mak, S. and Williams, R., 2010, May. The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on networked learning (Vol. 10, pp. 266-274).
  • Daniel, J., 2012. Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3), p.Art. 18.
  • Rodriguez, C.O., 2012. MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning.
  • Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D. and Seaton, D.T., 2013. Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edX's first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, pp.13-25
  • Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C. and Schneider, E., 2013, April. Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170-179).
  • Wang, K. and Zhu, C., 2019. MOOC-based flipped learning in higher education: students’ participation, experience and learning performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), pp.1-18.
  • Clow, D., 2013, April. MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 185-189).
  • Guo, P.J., Kim, J. and Rubin, R., 2014, March. How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 41-50).
  • Jordan, K., 2014. Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), pp.133-160.
  • Margaryan, A., Bianco, M. and Littlejohn, A., 2015. Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, pp.77-83.
  • Schuwer, R., Jaurena, I.G., Aydin, C.H., Costello, E., Dalsgaard, C., Brown, M., Jansen, D. and Teixeira, A., 2015. Opportunities and threats of the MOOC movement for higher education: The European perspective. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6).
  • Reich, J. and Ruipérez-Valiente, J.A., 2019. The MOOC pivot. Science, 363(6423), pp.130-131.
  • Bonfield, C.A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M. and Adachi, C., 2020. Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), pp.223-246.
  • Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., Alzahrani, A.I. and Alalwan, N., 2020. Factors affecting student dropout in MOOCs: a cause and effect decision‐making model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(2), pp.429-454.
  • Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O. and Lencastre, J.A., 2020. Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), pp.1-18.
  • Yuan, L. and Powell, S.J., 2013. MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education.
Еще
Статья научная