About the continuity of the northern concept of M.V. Lomonosov in selecting of geopolitical model to protect the economic interests of Russia in the Arctic

Crystallization of the geopolitical interests of the modern states already moving horizon of the public expectations 2050-2100 period. Accordingly, the priorities of the international community of practice are becoming more mechanisms to respond to the challenges of the global economy. One of them can be considered a problem to meet the needs of the expected 2050 world population of 9.1 billion people. The crucial prerequisite for its successful solutions are intense transition to high (innovative) technologies for economic growth, targeted consolidation of the competitive advantages of a country on the world energy market. Consequently, the Russian Federation, this means long-term development policy choice of natural-resource sector and protect the economic space of the North and the Arctic - a promising segment of the world economy and financial system a source of technological modernization of the Russian economy. The simultaneity of these two problems updating due to macro-resource potential of the North of the Arctic region of the Russian Federation, especially fuel and energy, which is the absolute foundation of world economic relations of Russia.

Such semantic evaluation of the resource potential of the strategic role of the Arctic in one of the academic work [1]. But this circumstance creates among the Western European community, concerned inevitably approach to human remains modest natural resources on the continent by the year 2100 to the identification of Russian raw shop industrialized countries. In many cases, this stamp produces focus of their global policies and practical actions [8, p. 71] and the nature of international competition, the eight circumpolar and many other countries. Thus, the rights to the North Pole in late 1950-ies of XX century have brought Canada in 2004 - Denmark, referring to the relationship of Greenland through the underwater Lomonosov Ridge with a pole. The International Court of Canada has established 100 years to the reasoned proof of the right accessories bottom of the Arctic Ocean. One of the elite representatives of NATO countries was announced by the hypothesis that the Arctic could become a field of confrontation, not excluding military. This is the basic reason for the entrance harsh Arctic cold North to the geopolitical scene of the XXI century, accompanied by para-military terms such as "Battle for the Arctic", "division of the Arctic."

Such semantic evaluation of the resource potential of the strategic role of the Arctic in one of the academic research works [1]. But this circumstance creates among the Western European community, concerned inevitably approach to human remains modest natural resources on the continent by the year 2100 to the identification of Russian raw shop industrialized countries. In many cases, this stamp produces focus of their global policies and practical actions [8, p. 71] and the nature of the international competition, the eight circumpolar and many other countries. Thus, the rights to the North Pole in late 1950-ies of XX century have brought Canada in 2004 - Denmark, referring to the relationship of Greenland through the underwater Lomonosov Ridge with a pole. The International Court of Canada has established 100 years to the reasoned proof of the right accessories bottom of the Arctic Ocean. One of the elite representatives of NATO countries was announced by the hypothesis that the Arctic could become a field of confrontation, not excluding military. This is the basic reason for the entrance harsh Arctic cold North to the geopolitical scene of the XXI century, accompanied by para-military terms such as "Battle for the Arctic", "division of the Arctic."

Only now can we say about the ideological conditioning of the modern geopolitics Russia with historical roots of the northern regional studies. Its scientific source through the work of the first Russian academician M.V. Lomonosov "Brief description of the different journeys to the northern seas, and a possible indication of the passage of the Siberian Ocean to the East Indies" [4, p. 417498, 602-615]. This work is dedicated to finding the route of the ships, it is necessary to perceive the scientific era document, because it contains various opinions on directions and methods of the study and development of the northern nature in the context of a nuclear thoughts White Sea, namely: "The Russian power will grow Siberia and the Northern Ocean . " So Lomonosov outlined the conceptual status of state-formula relation to the North and the Arctic. It may be called a symbol of his futurological presentation on the impact of the Northern (Arctic) spaces on Russia's geopolitical position in the distant future. Lomonosov in anticipation ahead of not only time, but also the position of many Russians XXI centuries, which nanoeconomics (economics personal survival or enrichment) eclipsed the view of the strategic importance of space to the north of Russia.

Opinions with this logic typical of other "Arctic" works MV University: "The letter of the north during the East Indies Siberian Ocean," "On Layers of the Earth", "Discourse on the more accurate the sea route", "Discourse on the Origin of Icebergs in the northern seas." In total content of the above-mentioned works focused views on the economic role of the scientist is practically undeveloped still cold spaces of the Arctic and the North of Russia, demonstrates in-depth knowledge of their natural potential, given the evidence base of how the attitude towards the Arctic may be an indicator of the historical (technological and social) progress Russian civilization. In any case, further proceed from this hypothesis, including the analysis of the causes of loss of principal axis of the northern regional politics and geopolitics of the Russian state, which is why the old problems actualized control the northern regions of the country and there were unpleasant for the Russian Federation, international conflicts [5, p. 223].

The history of the Arctic curiosity of the Russians did not start from M. V. Lomonosov, but he is the first to speak of the resources of the North and Siberia. Anticipation of the Arctic Ocean and Siberia as a major factor of growth of economic power of the Russian state, Russian great-power dependence of the world from the possession of the northern spaces attribute to scientific discovery of fundamental value regardless of time or completeness of the scientific understanding of this interdependence, the present and the future of the country from economic and geographical advantages of the sovereign possession of a part of the circumpolar land space. Contemporaries it is important that he regarded the possession polar space of the strategic premise of the future of the Russian economy, and the expansion of Russian power in the East - through the opening of the Northern Sea Route and when it is combined with overland to the Pacific Ocean called the necessary condition of its positioning as a great economic power in the world [4. P 494].

However, the current historical reality dictates that it is not enough awareness of one of the fundamental historical novel view of the Arctic and the development of ship navigation in the Arctic Ocean, the proposed Pomorie. The Satellites in the life of MV Lomonosov could not cross the Arctic at the space available for the transport of its era - the cart. The more psychologically feel it as an important economic resource in the world. Therefore, the idea of exclusivity underestimation of the economic development of the northern lands, and use of the Arctic Ocean for the Fatherland was still a reflection of the quality of social life. Now it is an unacceptable attribute for our political and economic ideas of the northern spaces, scientific knowledge and predictive assessment of the role of the Eurasian continent north of the Arctic Circle, the seas and islands of the Arctic Ocean to the North Pole, for the rightful ownership of - the historical factor of centuries of sustainable social and economic development of Russia. It is true when you follow clearly marked MV Lomonosov Russian rule should be jealous of anticipatory activity on its northern front, do not be late compared to other countries with practical actions in the region. It is better to be first in the search option of the presence in the Arctic, as it was with an affordable way to study the Arctic -drifting polar station on a proposal V. Wiese (1929) and the practice of certified 38 polar expeditions than collecting on the ice wastes presence of foreign caravans. To do this, it is important to improving the principles of geopolitics in the region. We did not stay away from this task [7, p. 107-122]. Earlier elaborated on them, so give here a concise formalized thelist:

to maintain the previously suverenized boundaries of the Arctic sector of Russia (USSR), 1926; b) pioneering character of Russian initiatives and practices in all areas of the Arctic geopolitics; c) management of the Russian Northern Sea Route;

d) protection of the external borders of the sea shelf of the Arctic Ocean; e) consolidation of national priorities in the Arctic, the international agreements on the problematic aspects of polar interests of the country - in a matter of priority by federal law; f) the real presence in the field demonstration of national interests, specificity and consistency for the historic expansion of Russia in the circumpolar area; g) a reasonable combination of international consensus and bilateral mutually acceptable arrangements for the protection of the interests of the North; h) resolution of disputes between countries in the mode of domination of strategic objectives, strengthen the international role of the Russian Federation in the institutionalization of rules for the use of space and the behavior of the Arctic in the Arctic; i) the search for compromise in the development mechanism of interaction in the Arctic and the ways to protect the geo-economic and military-strategic interests of the Russian Federation; j) continuing confirmation of the Arctic achievements of the historical experience of the Arctic presence as an integral part of Russian geopolitics optimal state with a northern boundary.

The presence and visibility of the rules of the Russian strategy in the Arctic - is a barrier to goodquality desired (attempts) some of our neighbors (and often they are not) to close the door for us to enter this impeccable Arctic home. Is there any evidence for the loss of the key from the house? What is the background of the struggle for this key? She previously admitted Russia doubts about the reproduction of historically acquired Arctic benefits and underestimating the role and place of the Arctic. It is available in the world situation, where "a lot of" spin doctors "ready" to show her her place "1 in case of contact with Russia in a difficult situation, so any delay in the political positioning of Russian interests without foresight unwanted chain linkages may complicate its status. Some of this can be considered an expression of agreement of the USSR and the USA on the maritime boundary from June 1, 1990, due to the parameters of the Treaty in 1867 on assignment for Alaska points demarcation line possessions of the two countries in the Bering Sea, which is why modern Russia may finally lose 70% its waters.

The set of claims of other countries for resources and space in the subregion of the globe should be considered the globalization challenge to Russia. It is necessary to find an adequate answer, without exception, the probability that the pragmatic principle of the battle for the future of the

Arctic may be going beyond international law. It is no secret that some of the disputed territories (such as fisheries protection areas and shelf around Svalbard) framed Norway unilateral acts, compliance with which it requires from other participants in economic activity in the Arctic. Illusory to believe that other countries will be tolerant to Russian interests without demonstrating that interest by Russia. It is not a political caveat is useful to perceive the recent statement by the representative of the elite of the U.S. administration about the Arctic, where the possibility of a military confrontation. We must proceed from the fact that the future Arctic rhythm - this is not the world of white silence, this place geopolitical "dance" of the main players on the world, the cradle of the confrontation of their interests and indicator of the ability to lead humanity on an azimuth of sustainable multi-polar international community.

Advanced algorithm political activity in this region of Russia should be maintained, especially in the Arctic Council - International Institute of coordinating the interests of the polar states on the international legal institutionalization of the northern border of Russia's Arctic possessions, originally established by decree of the Presidium of the USSR Central Executive Committee of 15 April 1926. This is the cardinal problem of the legitimate presence of Russia in the space of its historical acquisitions. We must firmly believes the thesis that the time of decision-making - is a phenomenon of the historical process, inevitably measures the historical consequences of future geopolitical behavior of the current generation of the federal government. Probably already enough that the ratification of the 1997 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea Russia challenged the sovereign right of 1.7 million km2 of 5.8 million km2 of polar domains in the Arctic, as well as, according to one researcher, has set the bar in the loss of the historical priority in the development of the Arctic space [6, p. 160].

Unfortunately, this is not the only point of leveling historical acquisitions. It is necessary to exclude such conflicts, then the story is not to roll down the top of Russia with the polar scientific and economic success. This requires a clear political foresight of the possible complications of historical decisions taken today, which can be seen only at the design horizon of thinking in the 2-3 century future dynamics of human history. Geopolitical grip for a unique natural potential of the Arctic Ocean, its underwater wealth disproportionate to other natural resources of the oceans of the world, is inevitable. Accordingly, the state faces a historic necessity to gain independence from a practical strategy of behavior in the sub-region. Russia, as a minimum, it is important to monitor the trends of changes in the strategic approaches of countries and international organizations to determine the status of the Arctic, the reasons updating their interest in it. Only this will ensure the future geopolitical stability of the Russian state in the Arctic. Russia should not reassure predictive determination of the Ministry of Energetic of USADOE that 43 of the 61 major oil and gas field in the Arctic are on the Russian side of the Arctic2, the more that will still look for the economic and political compromise due to the dominance in our part of the natural gas, and on the North American side - oil. Must emphasize one thing: who is better now sees potential prob- lems of energy supply of mankind in the future one hundred years, he would be the first to take possession of the Arctic for thousands of years.

How anxious s the procrastination with the Russian positioning? Let's look objectively at the emerging trend concept of geopolitics. Our neighbors in the Arctic home - are the Norwegians, British, Americans, Canadians, Danes, Japanese as well as international organizations (EU, NATO) - has long been labeled a range of economic geography "corrections" mode using the Arctic. They often contradict traditional of Russian interests in the region. In particular, the extension of Greenland, Denmark considers the Gakkel Ridge and the Lomonosov Moscow State University, Canada claims the Mendeleev Ridge as part of its shelf zone to the control of the Northwest Passage sea transports along the coast of Canada. They show themselves as active players in the Arctic, claiming sovereign rights over the space of the Far North. Moreover, Canada and the United States - partners to create a common political approach, the strategy of jointly confronting the Russian "capture" of the Arctic. Some states tend to option a show of force, for "if such a show of force will be convincing other states find themselves at a disadvantage due to its remoteness from the Arctic will be forced to agree to the extension of the sovereignty of these countries3.

Such motivation of the geopolitical decisions is not surprising, since the policy of competition for resources is logical causes of the historical and economic priorities of the attention of the whole circumpolar space. It concerns are of interest in terms of the modernization of the functioning of the Northern Sea Route. I recall that M.V. Lomonosov demonstrated the possibility of Russian naval transportation of goods to India and China, the Siberian Ocean on either side of the North Pole. He explained the role and place of the north-east Arctic route as a link in the Arctic Doctrine of the Russian Empire, mutual communication tool for development of internal surpluses with distant peoples, a comprehensive economic colonization of the northern territories of the empire. Back in the eighteenth century, he spoke of the possible rules settling uninhabited spaces, worried about the future greatness of the state of Russia. North move to India and China for the University - a strategic means of asserting the sovereignty of the empire (Russia) over the vast expanses of the North, why should I be sorry about "a hundred people, where you can buy the whole land in other parts of the world to expand the seafaring merchants might, for state gosudarskie and glory "[4, p. 602-615].

The primary evidence of the feasibility of large-scale projects naturally led to the justification of the construction of new ports, industrial plants, which would have transformed the maritime border in the northern edge of the bustling business. So it is the prospect of the creation of national marine economy, transforming Russia into a maritime power. A set of these proposals, especially when taking them as a long-term target priority institulizirovalas pervostrategiya Russian movement to the political status of power that could control the transport communications in the interest of many European states.

This justification of the transport communicationsis the evidence that the MV Lomonosov saw in the system prerequisites for the formation in the distant future of the Russian economy, export-oriented industrial goods. In this approach, we see the visionary awareness of M.V. Lomonosov importance of trans-Arctic intercontinental bridge for the Russian economy and its place in the world. Such a theoretical innovation of M.V. Lomonosov, when the idea was ahead of the technological capabilities of Russia for 200 years - an undeniable sign of his government (sovereign) thinking, academic excellence and scale of long-term prediction of future needs for the economic development of Russia.

The denial of this assessment – is a synonym for the backlog of intelligence historian of a science of the dynamics of the emergence and the development of the new ideas about the world. Detraction of who do not know – is a sign of a vulgar mentality of refined Russian intellectual and selfcontained power, which can not see dark spots of its own folly that inhibit creativity of modern citizens. They forget that criticism without critical reflection of previous ideas, and even more so from a position of knowledge of the following centuries, can be likened to the mass toy that no one would call an innovative factor in raising a child. Something similar occurs in the interpretation of thoughts MV Lomonosov, separated from us for nearly three centuries that is nothing but stupidity of the Russian historical science in relation to the desire worldview MV Lomonoosov to "give something better."

Designated collection point White Sea to promote the use of the Arctic seas to establish foreign trade and the formation of the international status of the contour of the Russian political economy and its socio-economic outlook as a global economist. His reflections on the northern ship's course can and should improve adherence to principles of scientific approaches and practices to determine the mode of economic activity of the country in the Arctic and the functioning of the Arctic version of the Eurasian transit. Such a problem is exacerbated hectic beginning of the XXI century, which did not lessen concern over the issue of the national sovereignty for Russia this communication, plays the type of pessimism that the "northern route will not soon face of climate change to a more favorable»4. This is a consequence of the crisis state of the coastal and exportimport Russian communications in the years 1991-2003. In particular, in 2000 the volume of freight on this route was only 25% of average annual traffic volume of the Soviet Arctic second half of the 80-ies of XX century [2, p. 167]. Also the quality of real regional policy northern Russia is still insufficient because it does not eradicated systemic causes deterioration of human development, reducing the attractiveness of the tasks for the development and the development of the Arctic for skilled compatriots [9, p. 132].

The debate on the status of the Arctic route - the problem field of Russian dialogue with the world. Its probably warms, the assumption that the world's elite conductors to form a management script Russian circumpolar space. In our opinion, this information field is created deliberately skewed to the erosion of confidence in the conduct of Arctic Russia. After all, there is no appeal to the Canadian affirmation of the right to regulate navigation on the entire Northwest Passage (along the Canadian coast within the sector). And at the same time we must understand that under certain conditions, the legal status of the Northern Sea Route may change from undermining Russian sovereignty, for going beyond the 12-mile territorial sea opens regime of the high seas for the passage of vessels. Consequently, Russia will have to ensure the safe passage of foreign ships through the Arctic, immediately adjacent to the Eurasian continent, and thus meet the 40-year-old USA strategic appetite. We are not opposed to the Northern Sea Route was an international transport corridor, but that does not negate the importance of safeguarding the inviolability of the Russian jurisdiction over him, recorded in the Federal Law on the Territorial Sea Russia, as does not negate the financial profitability of a harmonized regime for track use international carriers of general cargo to the extent not eroding the Russian system of regulation of economic activities in the sub-region of the world. Feasibility of Cooperatives financial resources of the international community and the national capital is useful for active modernization of the Northern Sea Route.

We have to touch on another aspect of the definition of the international geo-political status of the Arctic, on the interpretation of the contemporary realities that give rise to doubts in the Great intentions of other subjects of geopolitics on the future of the Arctic north of Russia. It is well known that the modern international public opinion (right) connects the jurisdiction of the islands and archipelagos of the Arctic zone with the presence of the resident population, with economic activities. If not, then these areas may qualify for other state. Broadcast this sentiment accurately represents the geopolitical desire leading economies, while at the level of political ideas, to change the balance of power in the sub-region of the world due to the transition to a multipolar management of Russia's national interests in the Arctic. Unfortunately, Russia does not see in the Arctic geopolitics of individual countries the trend towards supranational control model for Circumpolar potential. His contribution to this was made by Russian plutocracy with a program of Russia's refusal to present geopolitical role [3, p. 26].

In our view, the inhibition of Russia joining the WTO, the duality of the positions of the EU in the gas conflict with Ukraine, insufficient amounts of the foreign investment in the high-tech industries, and, finally, qualified energy power as leverage in its relations with the U.S., China, Japan and the EU - is also indirect evidence of attempts to strengthen the Russian resource-complex [10, p. 155]. At the same time it's a way of leveling its activity as a participant in the design process of geopolitical doctrine management of the natural potential, located at the bottom of the Arctic seas beyond its economic zone.

The hope that Russia's geopolitical outlook in the region are closed national historical dead ends into oblivion, eat in the Northern (Arctic) strategies of Mikhail Lomonosov. Her moral and psychological effect it is time to understand and apply without regard to the external reaction. This will confirm our compliance with confidence the hope of M.V. Lomonosovy for approving assessment of the future generations of his vision of the Arctic as a geopolitical space and location match the leading economies of the world for strategic advantage. Then Russia, where he was responsible for the historical continuity of thought glorious sons of the Fatherland, will find an optimal model for long term protection of the rights of the Russian part of the circumpolar world. The answer should be timely and effective. The first condition of Russia, as shown above is not fulfilled, so you should immediately implement institutionalized national interests and positions of Russia in the Arctic, dynamically institulizirovat the external border of the sea shelf of the Arctic Ocean.

What the philosophy of behavior would correspond to this approach? The core of the strategy, in our view, should be the pioneering nature of the Russian initiatives and practical actions to permounting national priorities in the Arctic, international law and the federal legislation on the problematic aspects of the suverinizatsii polar interests. First, the international legal consolidation of the Arctic sector of Russia (USSR), the boundaries of which are known the world since 1926. Second, the continuous formation of the biorganizational and legal restrictions on the activities of other states, primarily non-Arctic, the Arctic on the use of space, which, after the adoption of the UN Convention on the Law of the States qualify as potentially not Russian. Third, fixing any concessions to Russia in the disputed areas, where it is already fatally inevitable by design perpetual right to compensation for economic losses and the inclusion of perpetual right to veto the military presence of other countries in any form. Fourth, the need for pre-emptive actions sovereignty of the seabed of the Arctic Ocean, the leveling of the claims of other states on the shelf space. For the inevitable reconciliation of other countries with the dynamics of Russian interests now need the political far-sightedness, well adjusted algorithms for designing the geopolitical realities of the future. It is encouraging that the commitment of these geopolitical criteria demonstrates the work of a research vessel, the organization of a new polar ice station "North Pole-38" in 2010. Russia, sensing activation in the northern and eastern seas foreigners seem to "wake up" and start urgently POLES key areas in the sea. However, "it is necessary not only to the Post, but mine: some fields are in the border areas, and it is likely that more agile neighbors" drink "the general reserves of the field, before the start of production from their land." It is encouraging that the Norwegian-Russian problems for Section marine waters in the Barents Sea solved after decades of negotiations in 2010. This indicator straightening Russian Arctic authority. However, the Russians may seem naive problematic Norwegian self-determination in the Arctic as a great power.

No less overdue initiation of the coastal states to active formation and implementation of the geopolitical approach to the Arctic as a special area of the planet Earth. First, part of this approach can be a neutral territory status for military activities of all other states that do not have direct sea border with the Arctic seas. Second, the conditions of entry to the territory of non-Arctic states outside the economic zone of the Arctic states for the economic activity should declare an object of the subsidiarity control of the Arctic countries.

The Arctic has never complained about the weakness of the spirit of those who mastered its rigid body. Strategic imperatives of the modern Russian state behavior - it hosts a continuous-governmental and military activity, forecasting geopolitical role of the Russian Federation in the Arctic for the foreseeable stages of development, the indispensable support of public initiatives of the peoples of northern Russia, forming the image of the Arctic as a house of small nations. It is encouraging that Russia increases its activity in this part of the world, expanding the internation- al legal prerequisites for the position of sovereign rights. Thus, from July to October 2010 research vessel "Akademik Fedorov" conducted unique research and experiments in the Arctic Ocean forces departments of the federal and regional levels to justify the shelf borders of our country, including to identify the key parameters of the relief of the Arctic Ocean, Lomonosov and Mendeleev ridges.

Resolute suppression (torpeding) of the words and actions of the individual states to limit the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation in the circumpolar area is an expression and confirmation of the inviolability of the rights to the Russian military and geopolitical security, to protect the longterm strategic and economic positions in the sub-region of the world. But while Russia should always be selected out of the labyrinth of the geopolitical competition for the Arctic resources, and manipulation of the military-strategic importance of the Arctic area without loss of the international reputation. For six centuries, the economic development of the territory along the continental Eurasian Arctic Circle modern Russia is incredibly difficult given the price. She needs to confidently hold this territory at least another millennium, so the consolidation of the Russian people's self-awareness of the Arctic requires to build the northern regional studies as a science in the XXI century on the highest pedestal of Russia's strategic initiatives. Then each subject of federal, regional and corporate management will see the historical and economic importance of successful activity in the Arctic, sub-Arctic and on the shelf of the Arctic Ocean for the geopolitical future of the country. North needs a strategy for public administration, anticipating new problems of its development. To do this, it's time to stop endlessly generate a different concept of development, and instead once and for all to learn a concept worked out to adjust to changing conditions. At a minimum, you need a parity of the two vectors activities of federal-regional impact on the economy of the regions. It is necessary to promote not only the increase in the contribution of the northern regions in the GDP of the Russian Federation, it is necessary to return the financial resources of the Arctic region for integrated social development of the area and the immediate release of the North of subjects of the Russian Federation to the indicators of socio-economic wellbeing of local people. Advanced region - this is not the territory, with large deposits of this population of the high social and cultural potential, sublimating the values of the modern world.

Time is on the history of the Russian state if it respects the ideas of famous sons, calling everywhere and always take care of the increment of benefit to the Fatherland. Occasional manipulation of valuable arguments University of chilly ocean and North during the must stay behind. The only question us. Are we willing to be his successor model of the development of the northern and Arctic expanse? The extent to which we are able to use the arctic map for sure return to Russia in the number of economic powers in the world with a share of world GDP at least 10%? Only with a realistic path of macro-economic activity is realized Hope MV University, that "the people of the Russian times, antiquity secret ... of not only consume them, but also to the highest degree of majesty, power, and headed for fame."

XXI century will see this because of the objective desire to enter Russia 2025-2030 years of the five economic superpowers. In my opinion, the solution of this problem will inevitably contributes to diagnosis roots of Russian economic thought. Our economic mentality originates in the identity of the economic views of previous scholars and practitioners. North Mission University - also part of the intellectual scientific knowledge of the XVIII century. Meanwhile it also valuable. Therefore, for us MV Lomonosov figure of the past, as an important source of knowledge on how to build a well-functioning economy. We are destined to be aware of this heritage and to use it for unity of modern science and practice. Moral potential of human-citizen-based Lomonosov's ideology of our presence in the Arctic and the North of Russia, in his model of economic opportunities in the Arctic region should pave the historically successful strategy of securing a Russian flag on the North, in the Arctic. Then we prove a spiritual relationship with the MV Lomonosov. He, according to his contemporary, AL Schlozer, "could do honor around the North Pole and the Arctic Sea, and give a new proof that genius does not depend on longitude and latitude." Otherwise, the house will be in the Arctic neighbors with a desire to close the door for us to enter this immaculate home.

The paths of the decent leveling of the Arctic syndrome in the international community are few. First, the real presence, where appropriate, where possible and where there may be potential conflicts of snowdrops. That they did not flourish in the future misfortune better today cover them a piece of ice cold, laid Russian hand. The North is there, where interesting people live. Second, the demonstration of the world historical validity and the specificity of the strategic expansion of the Russian Arctic shelf in the area of the national interest. Third, the finding of the historical compromise in defense of the geo-economic interests at all stages of the interaction with the global community through the development of the rules of engagement in the Arctic, confirming the variety of the original ideas of the Russian civilization, inherited by new generations of Russians. Then the geopolitical wisdom of the modern state actors in the Arctic policy will be a historical confirmation of the stability of the Russian state in the Arctic. Russia in the North will be up as long as there are citizens with uninterrupted view to the North Star as the ever-glowing compass continuity public of the "Arctic" consciousness, pledged the first Russian academician MV Lomonosov.