Analysis of the development differences in Hungarian LAU1 districts

Бесплатный доступ

The complex analysis of different territorial units, regions or micro-regions is a very topical issue today, both globally and in Hungary. As we know, it is the continuity of changes at the spatial level that causes spatial inequalities, so it can be said that no two spatial units on Earth have the same characteristics. These changes have an impact on the economic growth, competitiveness and spatial development of a given territory, as well as on the living conditions and living standards of its inhabitants. As a result of the continuous changes in social, economic and infrastructural factors, we will examine a very complex issue, the main focus of which will be on the developmental differences and trends in the Hungarian districts (LAU1). In Hungary, the district system, which is the territorial level between settlements and counties, has a long history, since the earliest districts were established in the 13th century as administrative formations. Nowadays, districts (LAU1) are also located between the administrative level of counties and municipalities, as the lowest territorial and organisational level of state administration. The establishment of districts and the amendment of the related legislation is provided for in Act XCIII of 2012. In total, there are 197 districts, 23 of which are in the capital city.

Еще

Regional economy, complex development index, social factors, economic factors, infrastructural factors, centrum, periphery, lau1 districts

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149140617

IDR: 149140617   |   DOI: 10.15688/re.volsu.2022.2.8

Список литературы Analysis of the development differences in Hungarian LAU1 districts

  • Bodnár G., 2020. Analysis of Endogenous Development Factors in Rural Areas. Szeged, JATEPress. URL: http://eco.u-szeged.hu/download.php?docID=111217 (accessed 17 November 2021).
  • Bonifert D., 2003. The Role of Small Regions in the Countries of the European Union and in Hungary. Village-City-Region, no. 5, pp. 6-11. URL: https://regionalispolitika.kormany.hu/falu-varos-regio (accessed 19 November 2021).
  • Camagni R., 2009. Territorial Capital and Regional Competitiveness: Theory and Evidence. Capello R., Nijkamp P., eds. Handbook of Regional Dynamics and Growth: Advances in Regional Economics, pp. 118-132.
  • Csatári B., 2006. Small Towns and Suburbs. URL: https://mrtt.hu (accessed 18 November 2021).
  • Cohen B., 2015. The Smartest Cities in The World 2015: Methodology. URL: https://www.fastcompany.com/3038818/the-smartest-cities-in-the-world-2015-methodology (accessed 12 November 2021).
  • Enyedi G., 1998. Successful Regions. Enyedi G., Varga K., Scharle P., Borvendég B., Szaló P., Fejerédy T., Kolundzsija G. Book of Facts: Regions. Budapest, Greger-Delacroix, pp. 409-411.
  • Enyedi G., 2004. Regional Processes in Post-Socialist Hungary. Magyar Tudomány (2004/9), HU, pp. 935-941. URL: www.matud.iif.hu/2004-09.pdf (accessed 20 November 2021).
  • Faragó L., 2016. Socio-Spatial Inequalities. Space and Society, no. 30 (3), pp. 118-123. DOI: 10.17649/TET.30.3.2803
  • Hungarian (LAU1) Districts Based on Act XCIII of 2012, 2012. URL: https://www.ksh.hu/teruletiatlasz_jarasok (accessed 11 May 2021).
  • Hungarian Central Statistical Office: KSH-TSTAR Data Tables (TeIR) (2015–2019), 2020. URL: https://teir.hu (accessed 17 November 2021).
  • Káposzta J., 2014. Major Coherences of the Creation of Territorial Inequalities. Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics, vol. 58, iss. 5, pp. 399-412. URL: http://www.gazdalkodas.hu/index.php?l=hu&p=cikk&cikk_id=1076
  • Káposzta J., Ritter K., Nagy H., 2016. Local Economic Development in Transition Economies: A Tool for Sustainable Development of Rural Areas. Erokhin V. Global Perspectives on Trade Integration and Economies in Transition. Hershey, IGI Global, pp. 281-298.
  • Kassai Zs., Molnár M., 2016. The Social Success Factors of Local Rural Development. Ritter K., ed. Economic and Local Aspects of Rural Development. Gödöllő, Szent István Egyetemi Kiadó, pp. 108-117.
  • Lengyel I., 2003. Competition and Territorial Development: Competitiveness of Regions in Hungary. Szeged, JATEPress. URL: https://eco.uszeged.hu/download. php?docID=40089 (accessed 21 November 2021).
  • Lengyel I., 2021. Regional and Urban Economics. Szeged, Szegedi Egyetemi Kiadó. URL: http://eco.uszeged. hu/download.php?docID=122513 (accessed 30 November 2021).
  • Nagy H., 2018. Cooperation Opportunities for Local Economic Actors to Enhance the Competitiveness of Rural Areas. Studia Mundi – Economica, no. 5 (1), pp. 24-32. DOI: 10.18531/Studia.Mundi.2018. 05.01.24-32
  • Nagy Molnár M., Lendvay E., 2018. New Method to Support Decision Making Process in the Local Economic Development of Hungary. Regional Statistics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 69-91. DOI: 10.15196/RS080207. URL: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/terstat/2018/rs080207.pdf
  • Nemes Nagy J., 2005. Waiting for a Turn – Waves of Regional Disparities. Dövényi Z., Schweitzer F. Dimensions of Geography. Hungary, MTA FKI, pp. 141-158. URL: http://geogr.elte.hu/REF/PDF/nnjhullamok.pdf (accessed 29 November 2021).
  • Péli L., Neszmélyi Gy.I., 2015. Territorial Differences of Rural Cities and the Development of Transport Infrastructure in Hungary. Romanian Review of Regional Studies: Journal of the Centre for Regional Geography, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 69-84.
  • 290/2014. Hungarian Government Decree on the Classification of the Beneficiary Districts, 2014. URL: https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=a1400290.kor (accessed 12 May 2021).
Еще
Статья научная