Anger in public speeches and debates with a focus on speech strategies and tactics
Автор: Abdyrazakova M., Isakova K., Kultaeva N.
Журнал: Бюллетень науки и практики @bulletennauki
Рубрика: Социальные и гуманитарные науки
Статья в выпуске: 1 т.11, 2025 года.
Бесплатный доступ
This article explores the concept of anger in the context of public speeches and debates, emphasizing the various speech strategies and tactics used to convey this emotion. The study analyzes how speakers utilize language to express, amplify, or control anger, examining the rhetorical techniques employed in both formal and informal settings. The research highlights the persuasive power of anger in influencing audiences, the cultural differences in expressing anger, and the impact of such emotional displays on the effectiveness of communication. The findings offer insights into the role of anger as a rhetorical tool in political discourse, media, and public communication.
Anger, public speech, debates, rhetorical strategies
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14132056
IDR: 14132056 | DOI: 10.33619/2414-2948/110/44
Список литературы Anger in public speeches and debates with a focus on speech strategies and tactics
- Alieva, M. A. (2023). Epic genre on the Great Silk Road. Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo universitetaKyrgyzstana, (4(52)), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.53473/16946324_2023_4_67
- Alieva, M. A. (2023). Exploring Phonetic Considerations within the Scope of Translation Transformations in Diverse English Language Styles for Pedagogical Purposes. Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniya, (8(144)).
- Alieva, M. A. (2023).Translation of Silk Road sounds: phonetic and phonological aspects of English and Russian languages. Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo universiteta Kyrgyzstana, (3(51)), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.53473/16946324_2023_3_27
- Alieva, M. & Abdykalykov, N. (2024). Key Aspects of the Translation of Works of the Epic Genre from English to Russian. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 10(8), 518-528. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/105/66
- Charteris-Black, J. (2014). Emotional intelligence in the language of politics. Routledge.
- Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Sage Publications.
- Jones, S. (2021). Political rhetoric in parliamentary debates: A study of anger and persuasion. Journal of Political Communication, 36(4), 431-448.
- Lee, J. (2022). The rhetoric of activism: Mobilizing anger for social change. Social Movement Studies, 21(2), 147-163.
- Smith, A. (2019). Anger in academic debates: Rhetorical strategies and intellectual engagement. Journal of Rhetorical Studies, 42(1), 25-39.
- Taylor, R. (2020). The language of election debates: Confrontation and persuasion in political discourse. International Journal of Political Discourse, 8(3), 110-125.
- Wang, Y. (2021). Emotional expression in Eastern political speeches: A cultural analysis. Asian Journal of Political Communication, 29(1), 70-84.
- Wodak, R. (2015). The discourse of politics in action: Arguments, anger, and antagonism. Sage Publications.
