The Central Aporia of Positive Law Philosophy: “Punctum Archimedis”.

Introduction: the paper represents a methodological incursion into the epistemological core of legal positivism. Purpose: to prove that law enforcement is always associated with an extra-logical “leap” – an act of faith, interpretation, or recognition rooted in the normativity of consciousness. Methodology: philosophical toolkit – aporia (dead end), based on the dualism of “is” and “ought” and “Hume’s Guillotine”. Results: the fundamental impossibility of building a closed, self-sufficient theory of law on purely factual grounds is revealed. Conclusions: positivism appears not as scientific rigor, but as a form of ontological naivety that ignores the transcendental conditions of the very possibility of law. The work outlines the contours of a post-positivist “legal ecology” that accepts the hybrid nature of legal knowledge.