Classification of networks in higher education: a marketing analysis of the club of ten (Russia)

Автор: Kotlyarevskaya Irina V., Knyazeva Elena G., Yuzvovich Larisa I., Maltseva Yulia A., Kochetkov Dmitry M.

Журнал: Интеграция образования @edumag-mrsu

Рубрика: Международный опыт интеграции образования

Статья в выпуске: 1 (90), 2018 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction: the networking as a development practice in business has not yet become widespread. Moreover, there are very few studies of network interactions in the field of science and education. Advances in marketing evaluation of network entities are very rare. The goal of this article is to develop methodological criteria for such an assessment. These methods were tested on findings from the network partnership established by federal universities in Russia. Materials and Methods: to study and generalise real-world experience, a case study method was used, which the authors understand as an empirical research method aimed at studying phenomena in real time and in the context of real life. Results: the authors proposed a comprehensive methodology for estimation of networks. The application of this method of analysis enabled identification of the key problems and barriers to the implementation of the project. One of the main problems is the lack of marketing analysis, lack of understanding of its target audience, and, accordingly, the lack of a transparent vision of development. Besides, the authors have developed a classification of network partnerships. Т1Ю analysis empowers classification of the network of Russian universities as an inter-organisational polycentric partnership of a quasi-integration type, based on a neoclassical contract with relational elements. The analysis of the network development has revealed significant deviations of the results from the initially claimed ones. Discussion and Conclusions: the theoretical significance of the work consists in the application of the network theory to an atypical object for the economic theory, i.e. the analysis of the sphere of higher education. Practical significance lies in the possibility of application of results obtained through real projects in real-time mode. The results of the study are applicable to educational systems for practically all countries with a transition type of economic and educational systems.

Еще

Networking collaboration, marketing analysis, network evaluation, network analysis, classification, higher education

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147137254

IDR: 147137254   |   DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.090.022.201801.008-024

Список литературы Classification of networks in higher education: a marketing analysis of the club of ten (Russia)

  • Gumesson E. Making relationship marketing operational. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 1994; 5:5-20 DOI: 10.1108/09564239410074349
  • Gumesson E. Relationship marketing: it all happens here and now. Marketing Theory. 2003; 3:167-169 DOI: 10.1177/1470593103003001010
  • Morgan R., Hunt S. Relationship marketing in the era of network competition. Journal of Marketing Management. 1995; 3:19-28. Available at: https://archive.ama.org/archive/ResourceLibrary/MarketingManagement/Pages/1994/3/1/9503211254.aspx (accessed 10.07.2017).
  • Achrol R.S., Kotler Ph. Marketing in the network economy. Journal of Marketing. 1999; 63:146-163 DOI: 10.2307/1252108
  • Ahuja G. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal. 2000; 21:317-343. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:33.0.CO;2-B
  • Nenohen S., Storbacka K. Business model design: Conceptualising network value co-creation. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. 2010; 2:43-59 DOI: 10.1108/17566691011026595
  • Katkalo V.S. . Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser.: Ekonomika = St. Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies. 1999; 2:21-38. Available at: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/text/16210443 (accessed 10.07.2017).
  • Tretyak O.A., Rumyantseva M.N. . Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal. 2003; 1(2):25-50. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9227774& (accessed 10.07.2017).
  • Popov N.I., Tretiak O.A. The new directions of network management studies. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal. 2008; 6(4):75-82. Available at: http://www.rjm.ru/article/view/488 (accessed 10.07.2017).
  • Isaeva E. . Marketing = Marketing. 2010; 3:39-51. Available at: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17028622 (accessed 10.07.2017).
  • Tretyak O.A., Klimanov D.E. New approach to business model analysis. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal. 2016; 14(1):115-130. Available at: http://www.rjm.ru/article/view/136 (accessed 10.07.2017).
  • Chapman D.W., Pekol A., Wilson E. Cross-border university networks as a development strategy: Lessons from three university networks focused on emerging pandemic threats. International Review of Education. 2014; 60(5):619-637. Lipnack J., Stamps J. Virtual teams, reaching across space, time and organizations with technology DOI: 10.1007/s11159-014-9439-8
  • Huang F. Policy and practice of the internationalization of higher education in China. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2003; 7(3):225-240 DOI: 10.1177/1028315303254430
  • Maringe F., Foskett N., Woodfield S. Emerging internationalisation models in an uneven global terrain: Findings from a global survey. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 2013; 43(1): 9-36 DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2013.746548
  • Abedin M.A., Shaw R. The role of university networks in disaster risk reduction: Perspective from coastal Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2015; 13:381-389 DOI: 10.1016/j.ij-drr.2015.08.001
  • Dlouha J., Huisingh D., Barton A. Learning networks in higher education: Universities in search of making effective regional impacts. Journal of CleanerProduction. 2013; 49:5-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.034
  • Kearney M.-L., Lincoln D. Research universities: networking the knowledge economy. Studies in Higher Education. 2013; 38(3):313-315 DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2013.778682
  • Mader M., Mader C., Zimmermann F.M., Gorsdorf-Lechevin E., Diethart M. Monitoring networking between higher education institutions and regional actors. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2013; 49:105-113 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.046
  • Bystrova T.Y., Larionova V.A., Osborne M., Platonov A.M. Introduction of open E-learning system as a factor of regional development. Economy of Region. 2015; 4:226-237 DOI: 10.17059/2015-4-18
  • Kotlyarevskaya I.V., Sobolev A.O., Temkina I.M. The marketing policy of the Russian manufacturer in the conditions of joining of Russia to the WTO. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiye vedomosti SPbGPU. Ekonomicheskiye nauki = St. Petersburg Polytechnic University Bulletin. Economic Sciences. 2013; 3(173):131-139. Available at: http://ntv.spbstu.ru/economics/article/E3.173.2013_18 (accessed 10.07.2017).
  • Chelenkov A., Mezhevov A. . Marketing = Marketing. 2006; 5:99-104. Available at: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16993229 (accessed 10.07.2017).
  • Sekerin V., Shirshova A. . Marketing = Marketing. 2010; 1:119-126. Available at: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17028607 (accessed 10.07.2017).
  • Lipsits I. . Marketing = Marketing. 2012; 3:108-125. Available at: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22290365 (accessed 10.07.2017).
  • Mezhevov A. . Marketing = Marketing. 2014; 1:28-46. Available at: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21274582 (accessed 10.07.2017).
  • Webster F. The changing role of marketing in the corporation. The Journal of Marketing. 1992; 56(4): 1-17 DOI: 10.2307/1251983
  • Williamson O. Outsourcing: Transaction cost economics and supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2008; 44(2):5-16 DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2008.00051.x
Еще
Статья научная