Cognitive-stylistic and pragmatic aspects of semantic deviations in the short story “Fault lines” written by Barbara Kingsolver

Автор: Zakirova Madina

Журнал: Бюллетень науки и практики @bulletennauki

Рубрика: Филологические науки

Статья в выпуске: 7 т.8, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article is devoted to the pragmatic and cognitive stylistic analysis of semantic deviations in the short story “Fault Lines” written by Barbara Kingsolver. It goes without saying that in literary works a language tends to have immense meaning since the author has unlimited freedom to communicate his/her ideas in his literary works. This allows a writer to make full use of his creativity to convey his/her message towards the readers by applying his individual style. Semantic deviation is one of the linguistic deviations which is implemented when a combination of incompatible and illogical words violates literary norms of a language in an attempt to evoke a reader’s surprise, grab a reader’s attention, exert emotional effect and bring aesthetic beauty to a literary text. On top of that, very few investigations have been carried out to research cognitive-stylistic characteristics along with pragmatic characteristics of semantic deviations as key mechanisms of foregrounding and thus this can be an attempt to fill this gap. The language in use will be analyzed in an attempt to study “the meaning of language in relation to a context and of use and users”. Therefore, it becomes apparent that cognitive aspects and pragmatic aspects go hand in hand and in order to conduct effective research both aspects have to be and will be taken into account.

Еще

Linguistic deviations, stylistic devices, defamiliarization, grice’s matrix, pragmatics

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14124467

IDR: 14124467   |   DOI: 10.33619/2414-2948/80/62

Список литературы Cognitive-stylistic and pragmatic aspects of semantic deviations in the short story “Fault lines” written by Barbara Kingsolver

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41-58). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
  • Fafiyebi, D. O. (2007). A Corpus-Based Pragmatic Analysis of the use of Metaphor in President UmaruYar’ Adua’s May 29th 2007 Inaugural Speech. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 24 (3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2401094558
  • Kingsolver, B. (2014). Fault lines. Appalachian Heritage, 42(4), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1353/aph.2014.0078
  • Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford university press.
  • Kreuz, R. J., & Link, K. E. (2002). Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of
  • Language and Social Psychology, 21(2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/02627X02021002002
  • Leech, G. N. (1969). London: A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
  • Ninio, A., & Snow, C. E. (2018). Pragmatic development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429498053
  • Odebunmi, A. (2010). Ideology and Body Part Metaphors in Nigerian English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 8(2), 272-299.
  • Odebunmi, A. (2010). Ideology and body part metaphors in Nigerian English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 8(2), 272-299. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.8.2.02ode
  • Perrine, L. (1971). Four forms of metaphor. College English, 33(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.2307/374741
  • Salman, S. M. (2016). A pragmatic study of the recognition and interpretation of verbal irony by Malaysian ESL learners. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 445-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n2p445
  • Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts Cambridge University Press.
  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. Philosophy, 3, 143-184.
  • Stockwell, P. (2019). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. Routledge.
  • Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000018
  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua, 90(1), 1-25.
  • Wilson, D. (2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of pragmatics, 59, 40-56.
Еще
Статья научная