Corporate social responsibility as an effective signal of food safety: the results of economic and mathematical modelling
Автор: Sheina M.V.
Журнал: Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: Экономика @economics-psu
Рубрика: Экономико-математическое моделирование
Статья в выпуске: 3 (26), 2015 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The question of whether the strategy of undertaking corporate social responsibility (CSR) policy is an effective signal of a high level of food safety is considered in this paper. Despite the existence of some state mechanisms aimed at solving the lemon problem, the presence of a great number of fake and adulterated food on Russian food markets show that it has not been solved yet. Specificity of food (its experimental and trusting qualities) makes it impossible to evaluate the qualitative characteristics of food before it is purchased by customers. The analysis was based on Bertrand model with a differentiated product. Theoretic and game modelling resulted in articulation of the conditions for "desired" Nash equilibrium, where CSR policy is implemented by the companies producing safer food. The comparison of possible Nash equilibriums has lead us to the conclusion that the efficiency of CSR strategy as a quality signal is determined by the control and support of the manufacturers provided by the state and by the number of "responsible" health-conscientious customers. "Desired" Nash equilibrium may be reached without "responsible" customers, but with a high level of state support towards "honest" companies with a positive CSR record. This means that the weakness or lack of state mechanisms to support or encourage the manufactures, a small share of health-conscientious customers, their low activity in monitoring safety level when choosing food are among the factors determining the low activity of manufacturers in CSR policy implementation.
Corporate social responsibility, signalling, food safety, differentiated product, bertrand model
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147201486
IDR: 147201486
Список литературы Corporate social responsibility as an effective signal of food safety: the results of economic and mathematical modelling
- Kozlovich E.A., Sheina M.V. Signalizirovanie na rynkakh produktov pitaniya: korpporativnaya sotsialnaya otvetstvennost //Ekonomika i sovremennyi menedzhment: teoriya i praktika. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi zaochnoi nauchno-practicheskoi konferentsii , 19 June 2013 Novosibirsk: SibAK. 2013. S. 116-125. URL: http://sibac.info/2009-07-01-10-21-16/8323-2013-06-29-02-54-21 (accessed 16.04.2015).
- International Standard ISO 26000: 2010. Rukovodstvo po sotsialnoi otvetstvennosti. URL: http://www.ksovok.com/doc/iso_fdis_26000_rus.pdf (accessed 16.04.2015).
- O kachestve i bezopasnosti pishchevykh produktov: Federalnyi zakon ot 02.01.2000 №29-ФЗ (accessed 19.07.2011).
- Peterburgskiy ekspert: Nablyudaetsya rost falsifikatsii rybnoi i myasnoi produktsii . URL: http://www.regnum.ru/news/economy/1903976.html (accessed 16.04.2015).
- Polovina produktov v Moskve -falsifikat i kontrabanda . URL: http://top.rbc.ru/retail/03/07/2008/194873.shtml (accessed 16.04.2015).
- Problemy borby s kontrafaktnoi i falsifitsirovannoi produktsiei v sfere proizvodstva produktov pitaniya v aspekte prisoedineniya Rossii k VTO . URL: http://www.mcx.ru/documents/document/show/7363.1 91.htm (accessed 16.04.2015).
- Rospotrebnadzor: kazhdyi desyatyi molochnyi produkt v Rossii -nekachestvennyi . URL: http://tass.ru/ekonomika/1197606 (accessed 16.04.2015).
- A Nielsen report: Battle of the Bulge & Nutrition Labels. URL: http://www.slideshare.net/MPerna86/nielsen-global-food-labeling-report-jan2012 (accessed 15.04.2015).
- Aschemann-Witzel J., Grunert K.G., van Trijp H.C.M., Bialkova S., Raats M.M., Hodgkins C., Wasowicz-Kirylo G., Koenigstorfer J. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice. Appetite, 2013, no. 71, pp. 63-74.
- Baker G.A. Consumer Preferences for Food Safety Attributes in Fresh Apples: Market Segments, Consumer Characteristics, and Marketing Opportunities. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1999, Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 80-97.
- Barzel Y. Measurement Costs and the organization of Markets. Journal of Law and Economics, 1982, Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 27-48.
- Behrens J.H., Villanueva N.D.M., da Silva M.A.A.P. Effect of nutrition and health claims on the acceptability of soyamilk beverages. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2007, no. 42, pp. 50-56.
- Boccaletti S., Moro D. Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for GM Food Products in Italy. AgBioForum, 2000, Vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 259-267.
- Darby M. R., E. Karni. Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 1973, pp. 67-88.
- De la Cruz-Gongora V., Villalpando S., Rodriguez-Oliveros G., Castillo-Garcia M., Mundo-Rosas V., Meneses-Navarro S. Use and understanding of the nutrition information panel of pre-packaged foods in a sample of Mexican consumers. Salud Publica de Mexico, 2012, no. 54(2), pp. 158-66. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22535175 (accessed 16.04.2015).
- Ding Y. Three Essays on Consumer Behavior and Food Risks. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. 2010. Fall.
- Drichoutis A.C., Lazaridis P., Nayga R.M., Kapsokefalou M., Chryssochoidis G. A theoretical and empirical investigation of nutritional label use. The European Journal of Health Economics, 2008, no. 9, pp. 293-304.
- Frooman J. Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: a meta-analysis of event studies. Business and Society, 1997, no. 36, pp. 221-249.
- Glazer A., Kanniainen V., Poutyaara P. Firm's ethics, consumer boycotts and signaling. Copenhagen: Centre for Economic and Business Research (CEBR). Discussion papers, 2008, no. 8,23 p.
- Hartmann M. Corporate social responsibility in the food sector. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2011, Volume 38, no. 3, pp. 297-324.
- Higginson C.S., Kirk T.R., Rayner M.J., Draper S. How do consumers use nutrition label information? Nutrition & Food Science, 2002, no. 32, pp. 145-152.
- Hoepner A. G. F. et al. Corporate social responsibility across industries: when can who do well by doing good. Working Paper, School of Management, University of St. Andrews, 2010.
- Lev B. et al. Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, no. 31, pp. 182-200.
- Margolis J. D. et al. Does it pay to be good? An analysis and redirection of research on the relatinship between corporate social and financial performance. Working Paper. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University, 2007.
- Nelson P. Information and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 1970, Vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 311-329.
- Noussair C. N., Robin S., Ruffieux B. Do Consumers Really Refuse to Buy Genetically Modified food? Economic Journal, 2004, Vol. 114, pp. 102-120.
- Orlitzky M. et al. Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 2003, no. 24, pp. 403-441.
- Orlitzky M., Benjamin J. D. Corporate social performance and firm risk: a meta-analytic review. Business and Society, 2001, no. 40, pp. 369396.
- Prathiraja P.H.K., Ariyawardana A. Impact of nutritional labeling on consumer buying behavior. Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2003, no. 5, pp. 35-46.
- Russo J.E., Staelin R., Nolan C.A., Russell G.J., Metcalf B.L. Nutrition information in the supermarket. Journal of Consumer Researc, 1986, pp. 48-70.
- Siegel D. S., Vitaliano D. F. An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2007, no. 16, pp. 773-792.
- Sorensen H.S., Holm L, Mogelvang-Hansen P., Barratt D., Qvistgaard F., Smith V. Consumer understanding of food labels: toward a generic tool for identifying the average consumer. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 2013, Vol. 23, no. 3. pp. 291-304
- Sporleder T.L., Goldsmith P.D. Alternative Firm Strategies for Signaling Quality in the Food System. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001, no. 49, pp. 591-604.
- Stranieri S., Baldi L., Banterle A. Do Nutrition Claims Matter to Consumers? An Empirical Analysis Considering European Requirements. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2010, no. 61, pp. 15-33.
- Teisl M.F., Bockstael N.E., Levy A. Measuring the welfare effects of nutrition information. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001, no. 83, pp. 133-149.
- Wandel M. Food labelling from a consumer perspective. British food journal, 1997, no. 99, pp. 212-219.
- Zugravu C.A., Patrascu D., Prejbeanu I., Tarcea M. Food-Label "Check Before Buy" And Association With Demographic, Nutritional And Purchasing Factors In A Group Of Romanians. Annals. Food Science and Technology, 2011, no. 12, pp. 2229.