Critical evaluation of the Roan wind farm (part of the Fosen wind project) from an impact assessment standpoint

Автор: Aleksey I. Patonia

Журнал: Arctic and North @arctic-and-north

Рубрика: Economics, political science, society and culture

Статья в выпуске: 28, 2017 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The paper views the Roan wind farm, which is a part of the Fosen Vind Project — the biggest planned onshore wind farm in Europe — from an impact assessment standpoint. Using the traditional stages of the impact assessment (such as screening, scoping and identification of the baseline conditions and crucial impacts), the research implements the ‘traffic light system’ to assess the magnitude of the core effects of the project on different dimensions — i.e. society and nature. Even though the previously conducted assessment describes the project as an extremely successful one with huge potential of generating sustainable energy, the current analysis reveals some of its greatest shortcomings. Social and wildlife aspects are its major drawbacks: the construction site is on the grounds used for the summer grazing by the Saami reindeers and the height and number of turbines significantly threatens migrating birds. Thus, even though the project happens to be economically attractive, it is a rather controversial undertaking when viewed from social and natural perspectives. The paper thus presents many solutions for the minimization of these negative impacts.

Еще

Roan wind farm, Fosen Vind Project, impact assessment, reindeer herding

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148318574

IDR: 148318574   |   DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2017.28.77

Список литературы Critical evaluation of the Roan wind farm (part of the Fosen wind project) from an impact assessment standpoint

  • Wang S., Wang S., Smith P. Quantifying impacts of onshore wind farms on ecosystem services at local and global scales, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 52 (1), pp. 1424–1428, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.019.
  • Pettersson M., Ek K., Soderholm K., Soderholm P. Wind power planning and permitting: Comparative perspectives from the Nordic countries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14 (9), pp. 3116–3123, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.008
  • Bang G., Gullberg A.T. Look to Sweden: The making of a new renewable energy support scheme in Norway, Scandinavian Political Studies, 2015, 38 (1), pp. 95–114, Scopus [Online]. DOI:10.1111/1467-9477.12030.
  • Blewitt J. Understanding of sustainable development. London: Earthscan, 2014.
  • Ali M. Sustainability assessment: Context for resource and environmental policy. ScienceDirect [Online]. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780124071964 (Accessed: 02 October 2016), 2013.
  • Holder J. Environmental assessment: The regulation of decision making. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2006.
  • Rehn Τ.Α. et al. Sør-Trøndelag activity-related trial: Cooperation for better health, Norsk Epidemiologi, 2011, 20 (2), pp. 209–216, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2010.528224.
  • Kageyama T. et al. Exposure-response relationship to wind turbine noise with self-reported symptoms of sleep and health problems: A nationwide socioacoustic survey in Japan, Noise & Health, 2016, 18 (81), pp. 53–61, Scopus [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.085.
  • Skarin A. et al. Wind farm construction impacts reindeer migration and movement corridors, Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30 (8), pp. 1527–1540, Scopus [Online]. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-015-0210-8.
  • Haavik A., Dale S. Are reserves enough? Value of protected areas for boreal forest birds in midwestern Norway, Annales Zoologici Fennici, 2012, 49 (1/2), pp. 69–80, JSTOR [Online]. DOI: 10.3356/rapt-50-02-144-160.1.
  • Reichenberg L., Johnsson F., Odenberger M. Dampening variations in wind power generation: The effect of optimizing geographic location of generating sites, Wind Energy, 2014, 17 (11), pp. 1631–1643, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.165.
  • Urech M., Elcher B., Siegenthaler J. Effects of microwave and radio frequency electromagnetic fields on lichens, Bioelectromagnetics, 1996, 17 (1), pp. 327–334, Scopus [Online]. DOI: 10.13075/mp.5893.00343.
  • Vistnes I.I., Nellemann C. Reindeer winter grazing in alpine tundra: Impacts on ridge community composition in Norway, Arctic, Antarctic & Alpine Research, 2008, 40 (1), pp. 215–224, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2010.03.004.
  • Dooling R.J., Leek M.R., Popper A. Effects of noise on fishes: What we can learn from humans and birds, Integrative Zoology, 2015, 10 (1), pp. 29–37, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12094.
  • Croft S., Budgey R., Pitchford J.W. & Wood A.J. Obstacle avoidance in social groups: New insights from asynchronous models, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2015, 12 (106), pp. 50–71, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.040.
  • Marques A.T. et al. Understanding bird collisions at wind farms: An updated review on the causes and possible strategies, Biological Conservation, 2014, 179 (1), pp. 40–52, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2012.06.004.
  • Sorkhabi S. et al. The impact of land use constraints in multi-objective energy-noise wind farm layout optimization, Renewable Energy, 2016, 85 (1), pp. 359–370, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.026.
  • Barrett R.T. The phenology of spring bird migration to north Norway, Bird Study, 2002, 49 (2), pp. 270–277, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12183.
  • Hipkiss T., Moss E., Hörnfeldt B. Variation in quality of Golden Eagle territories and a management strategy for wind farm projects in northern Sweden, Bird Study, 2014, 61 (3), pp. 444–446, Scopus [Online]. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2014.927416.
  • Loss S.R., Will T., Marra P.P. Estimates of bird collision mortality at wind facilities in the contiguous United States, Biological Conservation, 2013, 168 (1), pp. 201–209, Scopus [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.007.
  • Bergstrom L. et al Effects of offshore wind farms on marine wildlife — A generalized impact assessment, Environmental Research Letters, 2014, 9 (3), pp. 1–12, Scopus [Online]. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034012.
  • Samarra F.I., Miller P.J. Identifying variations in baseline behavior of killer whales (Ornicus orca) to contextualize their responses to anthropogenic noise, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2016, 875 (1), pp. 963–971, Scopus [Online]. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.54.
  • Pekkarinen A.J., Kumpula J., Tahvonen O. Reindeer management and winter pastures in the presence of supplementary feeding and government subsidies, Ecological Modellin, 2015, 31 (2), pp. 256–271, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.030.
  • Paula J. et al. Dogs as a tool to improve bird-strike mortality estimates at wind farms, Journal for Nature Conservation, 2011, 19 (4), pp. 202–208, ScienceDirect [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2011.01.002.
Еще
Статья научная