Direct vs indirect investments: the implications of a choice for a short-term private investor

Бесплатный доступ

The subject of this article is the implications of a choice between direct and indirect investments for a short-term private investor. The purpose of this article is to produce a review of scientific research, conducted on the topic, and with its help to define short-term private investors’ necessities and to examine money market instruments versus money-market mutual funds as tools for short-term private investors. The conducted analysis of the recent research publications has shown that theshort-term private investors require high liquidity low risk instrument and can tolerate comparatively low returns, and that the best tools for such investments are money market instruments. During the research, we noted the trade-off between the T-bills and commercial papers with regards to risk, liquidity and yield, and considered the benefits of indirect investments via MMMFs; however, we came to the conclusion that the riskiness of such investments outweighs their benefits.

Еще

Direct investment, indirect investment, short-term private investor, t-bills, commercial paper, mmmf

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147232406

IDR: 147232406   |   DOI: 10.14529/em190109

Список литературы Direct vs indirect investments: the implications of a choice for a short-term private investor

  • Baghai R., Giannetti M., & Jäger I. (2017). Liability Structure and Risk-Taking: Evidence from the Money Market Fund Industry. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3093519
  • Carlson M.A., Duygan-Bump B., Natalucci F.M., Nelson W.R., Ochoa M., Stein J.C., & Van den Heuvel S. (2014). The demand for short-term, safe assets and financial stability: Some evidence and implications for central bank policies. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2534578
  • Definition of repurchase agreement. (n.d.). Retrieved July 24, 2018, from Financial Times: http://lexicon.ft.com/Term?term=repurchase-agreement
  • Golec P., & Perotti E. (2017). Safe assets: a review (No. 2035). ECB Working Paper.
  • Gordon J.N., & Gandia C.M. (2014). Money Market Funds Run Risk: Will Floating Net Asset Value Fix the Problem // Colum. Bus. L. Rev., 313. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2134995
  • Kahl M., Shivdasani A., & Wang Y. (2015). Short-term debt as bridge financing: Evidence from the commercial paper market // The Journal of Finance, 70(1), 211-255.
  • DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12216
  • Nagel, S. (2016). The liquidity premium of near-money assets // The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1927-1971.
  • DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjw028
  • Nippani, S., & Parnes, D. (2017). Recent evidence on political brinkmanship and Treasury yields // Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 9(3), 324-337.
  • DOI: 10.1108/jfep-01-2017-0001
  • Parlatore, C. (2016). Fragility in money market funds: Sponsor support and regulation // Journal of Financial Economics, 121(3), 595-623.
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.05.004
  • Perotti, R. (2016). 1 The Commercial Paper Market.
  • Sharma, U., & Varshney, A. K. (2018). Overview of Risk Analysis Subjected to Mutual Fund. Multidisciplinary Higher Education, Research, Dynamics & Concepts: Opportunities & Challenges For Sustainable Development ( 978-93-87662-12-4), 1(1), 436-440.
  • ISBN: 9789387662124
  • Wiggins, R., & Metrick, A. (2016). The Federal Reserve's Financial Crisis Response D: Commercial Paper Market Facilities.
  • DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2723547
Еще
Статья научная