E-learning in formal education under forced conditions using SDT and tam
Автор: Nandi A., Mehendale S.
Журнал: Cardiometry @cardiometry
Рубрика: Original research
Статья в выпуске: 22, 2022 года.
Бесплатный доступ
This study aims to understand the students’ attitude towards e-learning under the forced environment of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study gives a fresh insight into e-learning, considering the lack of comprehensive research on the influencing variables that impact the user acceptance of e-learning by learners in the Indian Universities during COVID-19 pandemic. The rational model has been constituted based on the Technological Acceptance Model (TAM) and Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to study the effective influence of Autonomy, Relatedness & Competency on the construct of TAM. The result showed significant relations of the self-determination variables with perceived ease of use & perceived usefulness, which further helps us establish a relationship between intrinsic & extrinsic factors of SDT framework with attitude and satisfaction level of Indian University students towards e-learning. This study will assist in bridging the gap between the understanding of organizations and actual factors impacting students’ learning process during the pandemic of COVID-19.
Covid-19 pandemic, e-learning, extrinsic & intrinsic motivation, self-determination theory (sdt), technology acceptance model (tam)
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148324605
IDR: 148324605 | DOI: 10.18137/cardiometry.2022.22.268276
Список литературы E-learning in formal education under forced conditions using SDT and tam
- G.G. Conole, MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia, (39), (2013).
- J. Daniel, E. V. Cano, M.G. Cervera, The future of MOOCs: Adaptive learning or business model? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 12, 1, 64-73, (2015).
- F.D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3, 319-340, (1989).
- E.L. Deci, R.M. Ryan, The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19, 2, 109-134, (1985).
- E.L. Deci, R.M. Ryan, The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 4, 227-268, (2000).
- W.H. Delone, E.R. McLean, The DeLone and Mc-Lean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19, 4, 9-30, (2003).
- H.F. Kaiser, An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 1, 31-36, (1974).
- R.F. Malaquias, F.F. Malaquias, Y. Hwang, Understanding technology acceptance features in learning through a serious game. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 395-402, (2018).
- A.I. Moolla, C.A. Bisschoff, Validating a model to measure the brand loyalty of fast-moving consumer goods. Journal of Social Sciences, 31, 2, 101-115, (2012).
- S.A. Nikou, A.A. Economides, Mobile-Based Assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of Self-Determination Theory and Technology Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 83-95, (2017).
- J.C. Nunnally, Psychometric theory 3E. Tata Mc- Graw-hill education, (1994).
- R.M. Ryan, E.L. Deci, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55, 1, 68, (2000).
- R.M. Ryan, E.L. Deci, Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications, (2017).
- Ø. Sørebø, H. Halvari, V.F. Gulli, R. Kristiansen, The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education, 53, 4, 1177-1187, (2009).
- P.C. Sun, R. J. Tsai, G. Finger, Y.Y. Chen, D. Yeh, What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50, 4, 1183-1202, (2008).
- V.M. Sunkara, R.R. Kurra, An analysis of learner satisfaction and needs on e-learning systems. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 13, 3, 433-444, (2017).
- V. Venkatesh, Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, 11, 4, 342-365, (2000).
- S. Zhang, J. Zhao, W. Tan, Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13, 3, 312-317, (2008).
- M. Zhou, Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92, 194-203, (2016).
