Feedback 2.0: the interplay of technology and culture in shaping communication
Автор: Vesna Scepanovic
Журнал: International Journal of Management Trends: Key Concepts and Research @journal-ijmt
Статья в выпуске: 2 vol.3, 2024 года.
Бесплатный доступ
This paper explores the role of feedback in shaping individual and collective identities. In modern society, identity is seen as a dynamic construct that is formed through interactions and communication with others. Analyzing the relevant literature from psychology and social theory, the paper addresses the question of how feedback, whether positive or negative, affects individu-als' self-perception and self-confidence. It also explores the impact of feedback on collective identity, emphasizing how open communication can improve group cohesion, while unclear or insufficient feedback can cause fragmentation within the commu-nity. This paper contributes to the understanding of the complex relationships between feedback and identity, providing insight into how identities are formed, redefined, and maintained in dynamic social contexts.
Feedback, individual identity, collective identity, communication, group cohesion
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170206426
IDR: 170206426 | DOI: 10.58898/ijmt.v3i2.41-46
Список литературы Feedback 2.0: the interplay of technology and culture in shaping communication
- Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
- Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding It and Doing It Well. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mentalni sklop: Nova psihologija uspeha. Random House.
- Edmonson, A. C. (2019). The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Work-place for Learning, Innovation, and Growth. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Graham, J. W. (1991). A comprehensive model of communication in organizations: An operational framework for analysis. Communication Research, 18(1), 51-72.
- Habermas, J. (2017). Teorija komunikativnog delovanja (prev. M. Popović). Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga.
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
- Husserl, E. (1998). Ideja fenomenologije (prev. A. Prica). Beograd: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on perfor-mance. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
- Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Online social networking and addiction – A review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 79, 44-49.
- London, M. (2003). Job feedback: Giving, seeking, and receiving. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(3), 248-262.
- Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2016). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 11(1), 81-95.
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: Press.University of Chicago
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Fenomenologija percepcije (prev. M. Krznarić). Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.
- Nussbaum, M. (1990). Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Press.Oxford University
- Pinedo, G., Saldaña, J. P., & Morales, A. M. (2020). The impact of digital tools on feedback within agile teams. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102182.
- Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is There a “Big Five” in Teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555-599.
- Stone, D., Patton, B., & Heen, S. (2010). Thanks for the feedback: The science and art of receiving feedback well. New York: Viking.
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. (2018). The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. Atria Books.
