Philosophical innovation in the context of using the anti-plagiarism program

When writing articles, PhD and Doctoral theses on philosophy today, a considerable "obstacle" has become their compliance with the required level of originality, identified with the help of the Anti-Plagiarism program. According to the hypothesis accepted by the authors, the reason for these difficulties lies in the fact that the criteria of novelty, originality of the results of natural scientific research are transferred to the humanities, in particular philosophy. The authors analyze the existing ideas about the features of philosophical cognition and the practice of evaluating the originality and novelty of philosophical research, argue with certain provisions that define novelty as "previously unknown". Taking into account the fact that the criteria of novelty are also debatable in natural science, the problem of the work can be described as follows: what can be considered philosophical novelty, philosophical innovation, is it possible to establish the content, originality of a philosophical article, thesis by machine methods?