Τhe ethnic theology in the Early Byzantine empire

Автор: Christos Terezis, Lydia Petridou

Журнал: Schole. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция @classics-nsu-schole

Рубрика: Статьи

Статья в выпуске: 1 т.16, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

In this article we present the general principles of Proclus’ ontological system, a topic that is also interesting for how spiritual activities are formed during the fifth century A.C. Specifically, we elaborate one of Proclus’ greatest theories, the theory on the intermediate realities as well as the main methodology in which he investigates these intermediates, which refers to the triadic schema “remaining-procession-reversion”. Although there is no distinction between theory and the methodology in which it is investigated, since they are in a mutual relationship and are almost identified, we make a distinction between them to understand the Proclean system. So, both the sections of our article have a general theoretical and particularly methodological orientation. The most important aspect that we attempt to show is how through the geometrically structured pyramidal openness of the first Principle these intermediate realities, which exclude the direct communication of the absolute unity of the One-Good with the infinite variation of the natural world, are formed.

Еще

Proclus, intermediates, remaining, procession, reversion

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147237621

IDR: 147237621   |   DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-1-34-53

Список литературы Τhe ethnic theology in the Early Byzantine empire

  • Aubenque, P. (1991) Le problème de l’être chez Aristote. P.U.F., Paris.
  • Beierwaltes, W. (1979) Proklos. Grundzüge seiner Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main.
  • Bousoulas, N. (1978) Πλάτωνος Φίληβος ή περί ηδονής. Thessaloniki.
  • Brons, B. (1976) Gott und die Seienden. Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von neuplatonischer Metaphysik und christlicher tradition bei Dionysius Areopagita. Göttingen.
  • Combès, J. (1987) “Les trois monades du Philebe selon Proclus”, in: J. Pépin and H. D. Saffrey, eds. Proclus lecteur et interprète des Anciens. Actes du colloque international du C.N.R.S. Paris, 177–190.
  • Corsini, Ε. (1962) Il trattato “De divinis nominibus” dello Pseudo-Dionigi e i commenti neoplatonici al Parmenide. Publicazioni della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia, Torino. Dodds, E. R. (1933) Proclus. The Elements of Theology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Gersh, S. (1973) Κίνησις Ἀκίνητος. A study of spiritual motion in the philosophy of Proclus. E. J. Brill, Leiden.
  • Gersh, S. (1978) From Iamblichus to Eriugena: An investigation of the prehistory and evolution of the pseudo-Dionysian tradition. E. J. Brill, Leiden.
  • Hadot, P. (1968) Porphyre et Victorinus, v. I-II. Études Augustiniennes, Paris.
  • Ivánca, E. (1953) “Teilhaben”, “Hervorgang” und “Hierarchie” bei Pseudo-Dionysios und bei Proklos (Der E. Ivánca, “Neoplatonismus des Pseudo-Dionysios). Actes du XIeme
  • Congres International de Philosophie, Bruxelles Voll.XII. [oder (1954) «Der neue Sinn von “Teilhaben”, “Hervorgang” und “Hierarchie”», in: Plato Christianus, Übernahme und Umgestaltung des Platonismus durch die Väler. Einsiedeln-Switzerland, Johannes Verlag].
  • Kojève, Al. (1973) Essai d’une histoire raisonée de la philosophie païenne, vol. III. Paris.
  • Moutsopoulos, Ε. (1982) «La structure de l'espace chez Proclus», Revue philosophique 2, 419–433.
  • Saffrey, H. D. – Westerink, L. G. (1968-1997) Proclus, Théologie Platonicienne. v. Ι, LXLXXXIX and v. ΙΙΙ, XVII-LI. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
  • Terezis, Ch. – Petridou, L. (2020) “The metaphysical “monistic” approach of the Platonic Timaeus by the Neo-Platonist Proclus”, Journal of Ancient Philosophy 14/1, 116–160.
  • Terezis, Ch. (1986) •ιάμεσα-Αρχέτυπα στον Πρόκλο και τον ψευδο-•ιονύσιο Αρεοπαγίτη: Από τον ύστερο Νεοπλατωνισμό στις απαρχές της Βυζαντινής Φιλοσοφίας. PhD Thesis. Ioannina.
  • Trouillard, J. (1972) L’Un et l’âme selon Proclos. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
  • Trouillard, J. (1982) La mystagogie de Proclos. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
  • Van Riel, G. (2000) «Ontologie et théologie. Le Plilèbe dans le troisième livre de la Théologie Platonicienne de Proclus», in : A. Ph. Segonds and C. Steel, eds. Proclus et la Théologie Platonicienne. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 399–414.
Еще
Статья научная