Human vs. Artificial intelligence - EU's legal response
Автор: Marijana Mladenov
Журнал: Pravo - teorija i praksa @pravni-fakultet
Рубрика: Original scientific work
Статья в выпуске: S vol.40, 2023 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the capacity to improve not only the individual quality of life, but also economic and social welfare. Although the AI systems have many advantages, they also pose significant risks, creating a wide range of moral and legal dilemmas. The European Union has been creating a legal framework for developing, trading, and using AI-driven products, services, and systems to reduce the risks connected with the AI systems and to prevent any possible harm they may cause. The main focus of this paper refers to the analysis of the Proposal for the Artificial Intelligence Act submitted by the European Commission in April 2021. The goal of the article is to move toward a possible resolution to the dilemma of whether the AIA proposal is appropriate for the AI era by addressing the scope of its application, the prohibited AI practices, rules on high-risk AI systems, specific transparency obligations, as well as certain regulatory gaps. The article should be viewed as an initial analysis of the AIA proposal in order to provide a useful framework for the future discussion.
Artificial intelligence, the Europan Union, regulatory framework, the Proposal for the Artificial Intelligence Act
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170202117
IDR: 170202117 | DOI: 10.5937/ptp2300032M
Список литературы Human vs. Artificial intelligence - EU's legal response
- Artificial Intelligence Act. (2021). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. EUR-Lex – 52021PC0206
- Bjelajac, Ž., &Filipović, A. M. (2021). Specifičnosti digitalnog nasilja i digitalnog kriminala [Specific characteristics of digitaliolence and digital crime]. Pravo – teorija i praksa, 38(4), pp. 16-32. DOI: 10.5937/ ptp2104016B
- Bogucki, A., Engler, A., Perarnaud, C., Renda, A. (2022). The AI Act and Emerging EU Digital Acquis, Overlaps, gaps and inconsistencies, CEPS. Downloaded 2022, September 23 from https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/CEPS-In-depth-analysis-2022-02_The-AI-Act-andemerging-EU-digital-acquis.pdf
- Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Artificial Intelligence for Europe. (2018). COM(2018) 237 final
- Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA, OJ L 119/89
- Ebers, M. (2021). Regulating Explainable AI in the European Union. An Overview of the Current Legal Framework. In: Colonna, L., Greenstein G. (eds.), Nordic Yearbook of Law and Informatics, (pp. 1-20). Downloaded 2022, October 15 from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3901732
- Ebers, M., Hoch, V. R., Rosenkranz, F., Ruschemeier, H., & Steinrötter, B. (2021). The European commission’s proposal for an artificial intelligence act – a critical assessment by members of the robotics and AI law society (RAILS). J – Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 4(4), 589-603. DOI: 10.3390/j4040043
- European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics. (2017). (2015/2103(INL))
- Gailhofer, P., Herold, A., Schemmel, J.P., Scherf, C.-S., Urrutia, C., Köhler, A., &Braungardt, S. (2021). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the European Green Deal, Study Requested by the AIDA Committee of the European Parliament, Study requested by the AIDA Committee. Downloaded 2022, October 15 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/662906/IPOL_STU(2021)662906_EN.pdf
- Gill-Pedro, E. (2021). The Most Important Legislation Facing Humanity? The Proposed EURegulation on Artificial Intelligence. Nordic Journal of European Law,4(1), pp. 4-10. Downloaded 2022, October 5 from https://journals.lub.lu.se/njel/article/view/23473/20819
- Greenleaf, G. (2021). The ‘Brussels effect’ of the EU’s ‘AI Act’on data privacy outside Europe. Privacy Laws & Business International Report, 1, pp. 1-10. Downloaded 2022, September 25 from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3898904
- Helberger, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2022). The European AI act and how it matters for research into AI in media and journalism. Digital Journalism, pp. 1-10. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2022.2082505
- Hickman, E., Petrin, M. (2021). Trustworthy AI and Corporate Governance: The EU’s Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence from a Company Law Perspective. Eur Bus Org Law Rev, 22, pp. 593–625. DOI: 10.1007/s40804-021-00224-0
- Klein, E. (1966). A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Amsterdam:Elsevier
- Koch, B. A. (2020). Liability for Emerging Digital Technologies: An Overview. Journal of European Tort Law, 11(2), pp. 115-136. DOI:10.1515/jetl-2020-0137
- Kolarević, E. (2022). Uticaj vještačke inteligencije na uživanje prava na slobodu izražavanja. [The influence of Artificial intelligence on the right to freedom of expression] Pravo – teorija i praksa, 39(1), pp. 111-126. DOI: 10.5937/ptp2201111K
- Kop, M. (2021). EU Artificial Intelligence Act: The European Approach to AI. Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments, 2, 1-11. Downloaded 2022, October 15 from https://law.stanford.edu/publications/eu-artificial-intelligence-act-the-european-approach-to-ai/
- Neuwirth, R., J. (2022). Prohibited Artificial Intelligence Practices in the Proposed EU Artificial Intelligence Act. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4261569
- Perucica, N., Andjelkovic, K. (2022). Is the future of AI sustainable? A case study of the European Union. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16 (3), pp. 347-358. DOI: 10.1108/TG-06-2021-0106
- Rahman, K. S. (2017). The new utilities: Private power, social infrastructure, and the revival of the public utility concept. Cardozo L. Rev., 39, 1621-1692. Downloaded 2022, October 5 from https:// brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1987&context =faculty.
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) OJ L 119/1
- Smuha, N. A., Ahmed-Rengers, E., Harkens, A., Li, W., MacLaren, J., Piselli, R., & Yeung, K. (2021). How the EU can achieve legally trustworthy AI: a response to the European commission’s proposal for an artificial intelligence act. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3899991
- Veale, M., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2021). Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act—Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), pp. 97-112. DOI: 10.9785/cri-2021-220402
Статья научная
