Innovations in laparoscopy: current trends and prospects for the development of surgical techniques
Автор: Noskova E.M., Darmina S.N., Zubairaeva A.R., Tlupova I.Z., Gabuev E.O., Khabibulla E.A., Tserr A.E., Bashmakova N.S., Mytnik E.E., Baiandurova L.S.
Журнал: Cardiometry @cardiometry
Рубрика: Original research
Статья в выпуске: 31, 2024 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The article examines current trends and prospects for the development of surgical techniques in laparoscopy with an emphasis on innovation. The latest technologies and methods used in laparoscopic surgery, such as robotic surgery, improved video systems, three-dimensional visualization and telemedicine solutions, are highlighted. The authors analyze the benefits of these innovations, including more accurate and effective procedures, shorter patient recovery time, and reduced risk of complications. The challenges facing the introduction of new technologies, including the need for staff training and the high cost of equipment, are also considered. It is concluded that innovations in laparoscopy play a key role in modern surgery and have the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes in the future.
Laparoscopy, innovations, surgical techniques, current trends, development prospects
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148328852
IDR: 148328852 | DOI: 10.18137/cardiometry.2024.31.3339
Список литературы Innovations in laparoscopy: current trends and prospects for the development of surgical techniques
- Darzi SA, Munts Yu. The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Anna Venerable med. 2004;55:223-37.
- Zelhart M, Kaiser AM. Robotic, laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: towards determining the criteria for the right choice. Endosc Surgeon. 2018;32(1):24-38.
- Peters BS, et al. Review of new surgical robotic technologies. Endosc Surgeon. 2018;32(4):1636-55.
- Mendes V, et al. The influence of experience on the comparison of subjective surgical ergonomics of laparoscopic and robotic operations. Jay is a Robot Surgeon. 2020;14(1):115-21.
- Lin L, et al. Preliminary clinical experience of robotic surgery in the treatment of genioplasty. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6365.
- Cianci S, et al. Robotic single-port platform in general, urological and gynecological surgery: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. The World’s Jay Surgeon. 2019;43(10):2401-19.
- Ro SK, et al. Comparison of surgical results of complex robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgery of distal gastrectomy: an analysis of the comparison of propensity scores. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):485.
- Ficarra V, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the restoration of urinary retention after a robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405-17.
- Park JS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of robotic and standard laparoscopic right-sided colectomy. Br J. Surg. 2012;99:1219-26.
- Gosrisirikul S, et al. A new era of robotic surgical systems. Asian endoscopic surgery. 2018;11(4):291-9.
- Alluri RK, et al. Review of robotic technologies in spinal surgery. HSS J. 2021, October 17; 3:308-16.
- Golla V, Williams SB. Cost-effectiveness of robotic prostatectomy in the UK: are we doing enough? Opening of JAMA Netw. 2022;5(4):e225747.
- Carbonnel M, et al. Robotic hysterectomy for benign indications: what have we learned in a decade? JSLS. January–March 2021;25(1):e2020.00091.
- Shirman AD, et al. Single-chamber knee arthroplasty using a robot is associated with earlier discharge from physiotherapy and shorter hospital stay compared with traditional navigation methods. Arch Orthop is a traumatological surgery. December 2021; 141(12): 2147-53.
- Witt RG, et al. Comparative analysis of opioid use in robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary science of the pancreas. July 7, 2022
- Rassweiler JJ, et al. The future of robotic surgery in urology. BZHU International. 2017; 120 :822-41.
- Carmichael H, et al. Feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) using the Medrobotics Flex® system . Surgeon Endosc. 2020;34:485-91.
- Folch EE, et al. Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for peripheral lung lesions: results of a oneyear prospective multicenter study of NAVIGATE. J. Torak Oncol. 2019; 14 :445-58.
- Probst P, Desai M. Expectations before reality: treatment of complications after treatment with aquablation for lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Lost Focus. May 16, 2022; C2405-4569(22)00109-2.
- van der List JP, et al. The current state of computer navigation and robotics in single and total knee replacement: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24 : 3482-3495.
- Prasad A, et al. Robotic hepaticoejunostomy in case of damage to the bile ducts of type E2 after cholecystectomy. The world of Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(6): 1703-6.
- Debesch-Adams T, Eubanks VS, de la Fuente SG. Early experience of using the Senhance® laparoscopic/ robotic platform in the USA. Jay is A Robot Surgeon. 2019; 13(2):357-9.
- Sethi N, etc. Transoral robotic surgery using the Medrobotic Flex® system: the Adelaide experience. Jay is A Robot Surgeon. 2020;14(1):109-13.
- Gabordi F, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic radical prostatectomy in one place (R-LESS-RP) with the DaVinci Single-Site® platform. The concept and evolution of the technique after the IDEAL phase 1. Jay is A Robot Surgeon. 2019; 13(2):215-26.
- Kunin LM, et al. Trends in the use of telehealth during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic — USA, January-March 2020 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69(43):1595-9.
- Korte S, et al. Determination of the delay threshold for the accuracy and effectiveness of tele-surgery in relation to tele-surgery. Telemed JE Health. 2014; 20(12): 1078-86.
- Chauhan M, et al. Robotic microsurgical forceps for transoral laser microsurgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019; 14(2): 321-33.
