On the issue of the criteria for filing claims for recognition of rights as absent

The author notes that in science and judicial practice there is still a problem of correlation of claims for recognition of rights as absent (negative claims for recognition) with positive claims for recognition of rights, vindication and negatory. The article analyzes the main criteria proposed by the civil literature for filing lawsuits for recognition of rights. The author suggests highlighting the following criteria: 1) dissemination in relation to any person who violates subjective property law by his actions; 2) the purpose of the claim is to eliminate the legal ambiguity of the title to the thing, to protect the regime of "legal domination" of the owner over the thing; 3) technical reasons for disputes about the recognition of rights as absent. The author believes that the conditions and procedure for filing claims for this type of claim should be fixed in law.