On the issue of the absence of the need to appoint a forensic examination

To date, the issue of the need to appoint a forensic examination in some disputes is quite acute. In certain disputes, the parties appoint a forensic examination in order to "delay" the decision-making process by the court, there is a problem that the parties are trying to appoint "their" expert to conduct the examination, who would be more "loyal" to the interested party. In addition, the appointment of an expert examination is associated with an additional financial burden imposed on the parties, and if incorrect questions are raised, there is a risk of additional expert examination or re-examination. In this article, we will try to analyze some of the listed questions and answer the main question about the expediency of appointing a forensic examination.