The conception of thinking in STA-methodology of G. P. Shchedrovitsky and the E. Husserl’s phenomenology: synthesis prospects

This article studies the systemic-thought-activity methodology (STA- methodology) of G.P. Shchedrovitsky and the E. Husserl’s phenomenology. These systems offer the formation of thinking in the conditions of the challenges of the modern era. At first examination, these concepts have conflicting grounds. The STA-methodology is based on the social determination of the subject, the technological development of the society and ontological relativism. Phenomenology is based on the freedom of the transcendental subject, the turn from techno-world to the lifeworld and the region of consciousness. The approaches to the thinking and consciousness of these philosophical schools have been explored. The study reveals that the structures of the thought complement and refine each other. The level of thought-communication, which was opened by Shchedrovitskiy, confirms the intuition of phenomenologists about the need for additional introduction of the linguistic level of thinking. Husserl shows how, with the help of an accurate identification of the area of consciousness, a transition from linguistic meanings (G. Ferge) to apodictic, which constituted by consciousness on the basis of the phenomenon “how he-himself-gives”. This allows reflecting thinking to go beyond discourse and to create innovation. Thus, the practical experience of STA-methodology confirms the intuition of phenomenology, and phenomenology resolves the epistemological problems of STA-methodology. Their synthesis reveals the perspectives for the formation of thinking based on the region of consciousness in the framework of the methodology of organizational-active games (OAG). This approach provides an opportunity to positively resolve the problems of postmodernism.