Constitutional law adopted contrary to the provisions Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic: scientific and legal analysis

The article analyzes the constitutional law of the Kyrgyz Republic “On the suspension of certain provisions of the law on elections of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic and deputies of the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic”. The author was able to scientifically show that the adopted constitutional law contradicts the provisions of the Constitution. In this case, the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic is generally recognized as the main regulator of all legal relations in society, which has supreme power. The article also examines the legality of such actions as the adoption of a constitutional law, the suspension of elections to the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic, and the implementation of constitutional reform. The author also referred to the decisions of the Central Election Commission of the Kyrgyz Republic on elections and referenda. Based on the decisions of the CEC on October 6, 2020, the Central Election Commission of the Kyrgyz Republic declared the results of the October 4 parliamentary elections invalid. In this regard, the CEC set October 21, 2020 as the date of re-election to the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic but noted that the Jogorku Kenesh adopted an unconstitutional law. In addition, it was noted that the adopted normative acts in the Kyrgyz Republic will be implemented on the basis of specially approved, adopted normative acts. This provision is enshrined in Law No. 223 “On the Regulation of the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic” dated November 25, 2011 and in no. 241 “On regulatory legal acts of the Kyrgyz Republic” dated July 20, 2009.