Научные статьи
\
Прикладные науки. Медицина. Технология
\
Mедицинские науки
\
Патология. Клиническая медицина
\
Нервная система. Невропатология. Неврология
Лечение гидроцефалии опухолевой этиологии. Современное состояние проблемы
Автор: Омаров Амид Дурсунович, Копачев Дмитрий Николаевич, Саникидзе Александр Заурович, Пицхелаури Дивид Ильич, Паньшин Георгий Александрович, Даценко Павел Владимирович, Измайлов Тимур Раисович
Журнал: Вестник Российского научного центра рентгенорадиологии Минздрава России @vestnik-rncrr
Рубрика: Обзоры
Статья в выпуске: 4 т.11, 2011 года.
Бесплатный доступ
В обзоре представлены современные подходы к лечению окклюзионной гидроцефалии, связанной с опухолями головного мозга. Выбор метода лечения гидроцефалии у этих пациентов в подавляющем большинстве случаев непосредственно связан с лечением самой опухоли. Микрохирургическое удаление позволяет не только провести циторедукцию и установить точный диагноз, но и в ряде случаев восстановить нормальную ликвороциркуляцию. Помимо традиционных методов лечения гидроцефалии, вентрикулярного шунтирования и эндоскопической вентрикулостомии III желудочка, могут применяться новые подходы, такие как интраоперационное стентирование желудочков и микрохирургическая фенестрация дна III желудочка.
Окклюзионная гидроцефалия, нейроонкология вентрикулоперитонеальное шунтирование, эндоскопическая вентрикулостомия третьего желудочка
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14955287
IDR: 14955287
Current treatment options for patients with tumor associated hydrocephalus
Current treatment options to patients with tumor associated hydrocephalus are presented in this review. Selection of the treatment approach to hydrocephalus is closely related to the treatment of the tumor. Microsurgery allows not only cytoreduction and precise histological diagnosis but also restoration of normal cerebrospinal fluid circulation. In addition to the standard options which include ventriculoperitoneal shunting and endoscopic third ventriculostomy, new techniques such as ventricular stenting and microsurgical ventriculocisternostomy can be used to control hydrocephalus.
Список литературы Лечение гидроцефалии опухолевой этиологии. Современное состояние проблемы
- Гогорян С. Ф., Берснев В. П., Ким А. В., Самочерных К. А., Малхосян Ж. Г. Опухоли головного мозга, сочетающиеся с гидроцефалией//Журн. Вопр. Нейрохир. 2008. Вып.4. С.39-43
- Коновалов А.Н., Пицхелаури Д.И. Лечение опухолей пинеальной области. М. 2004. 280 с.
- Коршунов А.Е., Арутюнов Н.В., Меликян А.Г. Осложнения и неудачи эндоскопической вентрикулостомии III желудочка//Журн. Вопр. Нейрохир. 2004. Вып.4-С.18-24.
- Коршунов А. Е. Отдаленные результаты лечения гидроцефалии методом эндоскопической вентрикулостомии третьего желудочка: дис. канд. мед. наук/М. 2005.
- Bruce J.N., Stein BM. Surgical management of pineal region tumors.//Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995. V. 134. N 3-4. P. 130-135.
- Bulsara K.R., Villavicencio AT, Shah AJ. et al Successful aqueductal plasty and stenting for tectal plate tumor after failed third ventriculostomy: a case report.//Surg Neurol. 2003. V. 59. P. 58-61.
- Chernov M.F., Kamikawa S, Fumitaka Y. et al. Neurofiberscopic biopsy of tumours of the pineal region and posterior third ventricle: indications, technique, complications, and results.//Neurosurgery. 2006. V. 59. P. 267-276.
- Culley D.J., Berger MS, Shaw D, Geyer R. An analysis of factors determining the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunts after posterior fossa tumor surgery in children.//Neurosurgery. 1994. V. 34. P. 402-408.
- Di Rocco C., Massimi L, Tamburrini G. Shunts vs endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants: are there different types and/or rates of complications? A review.//Childs Nerv Syst. 2006. V. 22. N 12. P. 1573-1589.
- Drake J.M., Kestle JR, Milner R et al. Randomized trial of cerebrospinal fluid shunt valve design in pediatric hydrocephalus.//Neurosurgery. 1998. V. 43. P. 294-305.
- Drake J.M., Kulkarni AV, Kestle J. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric patients: a decision analysis.//Childs Nerv Syst. 2009. V. 25. N 4. P. 467-472.
- Dusick J.R., McArthur DL, Bergsneider M. Success and complication rates of endoscopic third ventriculostomy for adult hydrocephalus: A series of 108 patients.//Surg Neurol. 2008. V. 69. P. 5-15.
- Epstein F, Murali R. Paediatric posterior fossa tumors: hazards of the"preoperative" shunt.//Neurosurgery. 1978. V. 3. P. 348-350.
- Fritsch M.J., Kienke S, Mehdorn HM. Endoscopic aqueductoplasty: stent or not to stent?//Childs Nerv Syst. 2004. V. 20. P. 137-142.
- Gaab M.R., Schroeder HW. Neuroendoscopic approach to intraventricular lesions.//J Neurosurg. 1998. V. 88. P. 496-505.
- Garton H.J., Kestle JR, Cochrane DD, Steinbok P. A cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic third ventriculostomy.//Neurosurgery. 2002. V. 51. N 1. P. 69-77.
- Goel A. Preoperative shunts in thalamic tumours.//Neurol India. 2000. V. 48. N 4. P. 347-350
- Goel A. Preoperative shunts in suprasellar tumours.//Br J Neurosurg. 1995. V. 9. N 2. P. 189-193.
- Hanlo P.W., Cinalli G, Vandertop WP. et al. Treatment of hydrocephalus determined by the European Orbis Sigma Valve II survey: a multicenter prospective 5-year shunt survival study in children and adults in whom a flowregulating shunt was used.//J Neurosurg. 2003. V. 99. P. 52-57.
- Hopf N.J., Grunert P, Fries G. et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures.//Neurosurgery. 1999. V. 44. P. 795-806.
- Kestle J.R., Drake JM, Cochrane DD. et al. Endoscopic shunt insertion trial participants. Lack of benefit of endoscopic ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion: a multicenter randomized trial.//J Neurosurg. 2003. V. 98. P. 284-290.
- Konovalov A.N., Pitskhelauri DI. Principles of treatment of the pineal region tumors.//Surg Neurol. 2003. V. 59. N 4. P. 250-268.
- Kulkarni A.V., Drake JM, Kestle JR. et al. Canadian Pediatric Neurosurgery Study Group. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy vs cerebrospinal fluid shunt in the treatment of hydrocephalus in children: a propensity score-adjusted analysis.//Neurosurgery. 2010. V. 67. N 3. P. 588-393.
- O'Brien D.F., Hayhurst C, Pizer B. et al. Outcomes in patients undergoing single-trajectory endoscopic third ventriculostomy and endoscopic biopsy for midline tumours presenting with obstructive hydrocephalus.//J Neurosurg. 2006. V. 105. P. 219-226.
- Oka K., Kin Y, Go Y. et al. Neuroendoscopic approach to tectal tumours: a consecutive series.//J Neurosurg. 1999. V. 91. P. 964-970.
- Omay S.B., Baehring J, Piepmeier JM. Approaches to lateral and third ventricular tumors In: Schmidek HH, Roberts DW, eds. Schmidek and Sweet's Operative Neurosurgical Techniques: Indications, Methods and Results. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc. 2006. P. 753-771.
- Pendl G., Vorkapic P, Koniyama M. Microsurgery of midbrain lesions.//Neurosurgery. 1990. V. 26. P. 641-648.
- Peretta P., Cinalli G, Spennato P. et al. Long-term results of a second endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children: retrospective analysis of 40 cases.//Neurosurgery. 2009. V. 65. P. 539-347.
- Piepmeier J.M. Tumors and approaches to the lateral ventricles. Introduction and overview.//J Neurooncol. 1996. V. 30 N 3. P. 267-274.
- Pitskhelauri D.I., Konovalov AN, Kornienko VN. et al. Intraoperative direct third ventriculostomy and aqueductal stenting in deep-seated midline brain tumor surgery.//Neurosurgery 2009. V. 64. P. 256-266.
- Pollack I.F., Hoffman HJ, Humphreys RP. et al. The long-term outcome after surgical treatment of dorsally exophytic brain-stem gliomas.//J Neurosurg. 1993. V. 78. N 6. P. 859-863.
- Riva-Cambrin J., Detsky A.S. et al. Predicting postresection hydrocephalus in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors.//J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009. V. 3. N 5. P. 378-385.
- Sainte-Rose C, Cinalli G, Roux FE. et al. Management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors: the role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy.//J Neurosurg. 2001. V. 95. P. 791-797.
- Steiger H.J., Götz C, Schmid-Elsaesser R. et al. Thalamic astrocytomas: Surgical anatomy and results of a pilot series using maximum microsurgical removal.//Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000. V. 142. P. 1327-1337.
- Stein SC, Guo W. Have we made progress in preventing shunt failure? A critical analysis.//J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008. V. 1. P. 40-47.
- Schroeder H.W.S., Niendorf W-R, Gaab MR. Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy.//J Neurosurg. 2002. V. 96. P. 1032-1040.
- Tamburrini G., Di Rocco C, Caldarelli M. et al. Postoperative third ventriculostomy in children with posterior cranial fossa tumors.//Childs Nerv Syst. 2003. V. 19. P. 691-692.
- Tirakotai W., Riegel T, Schulte DM. et al. Neuroendoscopic stent procedure in obstructive hydrocephalus due to both foramina of monro occluding craniopharyngioma: technical note.//Surg Neurol. 2006. V. 1. N 3. P. 293-296.
- Van Lindert E.J., Beems T, Grotenhuis JA. The role of different imaging modalities: is MRI a conditio sine qua non for ETV?//Childs Nerv Syst. 2006. V. 22, N 12. P. 1529-1536.
- Yamini B., Refai D., Rubin CM. et al. Initial endoscopic management of pineal region tumors and associated hydrocephalus: Clinical series and literature review.//J Neurosurg. 2004. V. 100. P. 437-441.
