Liability of online platforms for content moderation from the perspective of the European Court of Human Rights – challenges and recent developments
Автор: Marijana Mladenov, Tamara Staparski
Журнал: Pravo - teorija i praksa @pravni-fakultet
Рубрика: Articles
Статья в выпуске: 4 vol.41, 2024 года.
Бесплатный доступ
While not a novel phenomenon, online platforms have gained significant economic and societal importance over the past decade, and the public discourse around their responsibilities and liabilities has reached an exceptional level. Online platforms significantly contribute to facilitating the exchange and access to information, enabling the widespread distribution of all types of content, regardless of their legality. The regulation of content on online platforms undoubtedly impacts the protection of human rights, particularly freedom of expression, which has led the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) to establish important criteria through its jurisprudence. To understand the implications of the ECtHR’s case law, it is important to briefly present the concept of platform liability within the European legal framework, which is outlined in the opening section of the paper. In the subsequent part, the authors analyze the relevant ECtHR jurisprudence. The aim of the paper is to clarify the main standards of the ECtHR’s approach to the human rights implications of online platforms’ liability for content moderation, while also potentially highlighting their limitations.
Online platforms’ liability, content moderation, Digital Service Act, European Court of Human Rights
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170206451
IDR: 170206451 | DOI: 10.5937/ptp2404152M
Список литературы Liability of online platforms for content moderation from the perspective of the European Court of Human Rights – challenges and recent developments
- Council of Europe. (2021). Freedom of Expression: News Guidance Note on Content Moderation. Downloaded 2024, July 15 from https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/-/guidance-note-on-content-moderation.
- Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market ('Directive on electronic commerce'), OJ L 178 of 17.07.2000.
- Enarsson, T. (2024). Navigating hate speech and content moderation under the DSA: insights from ECtHR case law. Information & Communications Technology Law, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2024.2395579.
- European Parliament. (2021.) Liability of online platforms. Downloaded 2024, July 15 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/656318/EPRS_STU(2021)656318_EN.pdf.
- Frosio, G., & Geiger, C. (2023). Taking fundamental rights seriously in the Digital Services Act's platform liability regime. European Law Journal, 29(1-2), pp. 31-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12475.
- Husovec, M., Grote, T., Mazhar, Y., Mikhaeil, C., Escalona, H. M., Kumar, P. S., & Sreenath, S. (2024). Grand confusion after Sanchez v. France: Seven reasons for concern about Strasbourg jurisprudence on intermediaries. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X241268436.
- Korpisaari, P. (2022). From Delfi to Sanchez–when can an online communication platform be responsible for third-party comments? An analysis of the practice of the ECtHR and some reflections on the Digital Services Act. Journal of Media Law, 14(2), pp. 352-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2022.2148335.
- Lučić, S. (2022). The Operator’s Liability for Copyright Violations Committed by Users of its Platform. Pravo teorija i praksa, 39(4), pp. 109-123. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2204109L.
- Mladenov, M., & Staparski, T. (2022). Human Rights Approach to Internet Access with a Special Emphasis on the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Revija za evropsko pravo, 24(1), pp. 23-38. Downloaded 2024, July 15 from http://revija.pravoeu.org/index.php/REP/article/view/54.
- Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act), OJ L 277 of 27.10.2022.
- Schlag, G. (2023). European Union’s regulating of social media: A discourse analysis of the digital services act. Politics and Governance, 11(3), pp. 168-177. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6735.
- Tuchtfeld, E. (2023a). Be Careful What You Wish For: The Problematic Desires of the European Court of Human Rights for Upload Filters in Content Moderation, VerfBlog, Downloaded 2024, August 17 from https://verfassungsblog.de/be-careful-what-you-wish-for/.
- Tuchtfeld, E. (2023b). Case law on content moderation and freedom of expression. Columbia Global Freedom of Expression. Downloaded 2024, August 19 from https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/GFoE_Content-Moderation.pdf.
- Turillazzi, A., Taddeo, M., Floridi, L., & Casolari, F. (2023). The digital services act: an analysis of its ethical, legal, and social implications. Law, Innovation and Technology, 15(1), pp. 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2023.2184136.