Low level and quality of life among economically active population: identification criteria and assessment of occurrence

Автор: Bobkov Vyacheslav N., Odintsova Elena V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Labor economics

Статья в выпуске: 5 т.13, 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article presents the results of identification of groups with low level and quality of life among Russian economically active population. Its relevance is determined by the clarification of national goals and targets for Russia’s development until 2030, as well as the reduction of population’s level and quality of life considering socio-economic consequences associated with measures to counter the spread of COVID-19. The results of the research complement other publications devoted to the study of multidimensional poverty and the social structure of society, offering criteria and social standards for identifying the lower groups by the level and quality of life among economically active population. Social standards for assessing the employment situation, education, material and property provision of households (monetary income, savings, and real estate), as well as social standards taking into account self-assessments of the level and quality of life, are overviewed. When identifying the employment situation, it is proposed to identify key and additional features of precarious employment with the identification of the most vulnerable groups among the employed. Based on the analysis of RLMS data, we obtained estimates of the scale of groups with low level and quality of life in Russia for 2018, which include more than 40% of economically active population. Among them, precariously employed people are the most widely represented, while a significant part of them is characterized by a concentration of signs of precarious employment. The structure of groups with a low level and quality of life is determined, and the core, extended core, and periphery are identified in their composition. The proposed methodology makes it possible to develop targeted social policy measures taking into account typical problems in the area of employment, material and property provision, etc. Further research may be linked to development of a methodology for multi-criteria identification of groups that are characterized by a more prosperous situation in terms of the level and quality of life, including the study of the prevalence of precarious employment among them.


Low level of life, low quality of life, employment situation, precarious employment, education, monetary income, savings, real estate provision, self-evaluation of the level and quality of life

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147225487

IDR: 147225487   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.10

Список литературы Low level and quality of life among economically active population: identification criteria and assessment of occurrence

  • Ovcharova L.N. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie podkhody k otsenke urovnya, profilya i faktorov bednosti: rossiiskii i mezhdunarodnyi opyt [Theoretical and Practical Approaches to the Assessment of the Level, Profile and Determinants of Poverty: Russian and International Experience]. Moscow: M-Studio, 2009. 268 p.
  • Grishina E.E. The material deprivation rate for households with children in Russia and European countries. Finansovyi zhurnal=Financial Journal, 2017, no. 4, pp. 47–55 (in Russian).
  • Korchagina I.I., Prokofieva L.M., Ter-Akopov S.A. European experience in measuring poverty and social exclusion: AROPE index. Narodonaselenie=Population, 2019, no. 3, pp. 162–175. DOI: 10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00034 (in Russian).
  • Maleva T.M., Grishina E.E., Tsatsura E.A. Sotsial’naya politika v dolgosrochnoi perspektive: mnogomernaya bednost’ i effektivnaya adresnost’ [Social Policy in the Long Term: Multidimensional Poverty and Effective Targeting]. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom «Delo» RANKhiGS, 2019. 52 p.
  • Gorshkov M.K., Anikin V.A., Byzov L.G., Drobizheva L.M., Karavai A.V., Latova N.V., Lezhnina Yu.P., Mareeva S.V., Mchedlova M.M., Petukhov V.V., Petukhov R.V., Sedova N.N., Slobodenyuk E.D., Tikhonova N.E., Shevchenko A.G. Rossiiskoe obshchestvo i vyzovy vremeni [Russian Society and Challenges of the Time]. Book three. Ed. by M.K. Gorshkov, N.E. Tikhonova. Moscow: Ves’ Mir, 2016. 424 p.
  • Shastitko A.E., Avdasheva S.B., Ovchinnikov M.A., Maleva T.M., Ovcharova L.N. Rossiiskie srednie klassy nakanune i na pike ekonomicheskogo rosta [The Russian Middle Classes on the Eve and at the Peak of Economic Growth]. Moscow: Ekon-Inform, 2008. 200 p.
  • Maleva T.M., Burdyak A.Ya., Tyndik A.O. Middle classes at different stages of life course. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii=Journal of the New Economic Association, 2015, no. 3, pp. 109–138 (in Russian).
  • Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V., Kvachev V.G., Kolmakov I.B., Pavlova V.V., Yudina M.A. Srednie klassy v kapitalisticheskoi Rossii: nauchnaya monografiya [The Middle Classes in Capitalist Russia: A Scientific Monograph]. Head scientific editorship by V.N. Bobkov. Second edition, ster. Moscow: KNORUS, 2019. 208 p.
  • Benach J., Vives A., Amable M., Vanroelen C., Tarafa G., Muntaner C. Precarious employment: Understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annual Review of Public Health, 2014, vol. 35, рр. 229–253. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182500
  • Lewchuk W., Lafleche M., Dyson D., Goldring L., Meisner A., Procyk S., Rosen D., Shields J., Viducis P., Vrankulj S. It’s more than Poverty. Employment Precarity and Household Well-being. Toronto: PEPSO, McMaster University, United Way Toronto, 2013. 115 р.
  • Lewchuk W., Procyk S., Laflèche M., Rosen D., Dyson D., Shields J., Goldring L., Viducis P., Meisner A., Vrankulj S. Is precarious employment low income employment? The changing labour market in Southern Ontario. Just Labour, 2014, vol. 22, рр. 51–73.
  • Lewchuk W., Laflèche M., Procyk S., Cook Ch., Dyson D., Goldring L., Lior K., Meisner A., Shields J., Tambureno A., Viducis P. The Precarity Penalty: The Impact of Precarious Employment on Individuals, Households and Communities – And What to Do About It. Toronto: PEPSO, McMaster University, United Way Toronto, 2015. 196 p.
  • Lewchuk W., Laflèche M., Procyk S., Cook Ch., Dyson D., Goldring L., Lior K., Meisner A., Shields J., Tambureno A., Viducis P. The precarity penalty: How insecure employment disadvantages workers and their families. Alternate Routes, 2016, vol. 27, рр. 87–108.
  • Pembroke S. Precarious Work Precarious Lives: How Policy Can Create more Security. Dublin: TASC, 2018. 117 р.
  • Preoteasa A.M.D., Sieber R., Budowski M., Suter Ch. Household role in coping with precarious work. Evidence from qualitative research in urban Romania and Switzerland. Social Change Review, 2016, vol. 14(2), рp. 177–201. DOI: 10.1515/scr-2016-0027
  • Procyk S., Lewchuk W., Shields J. (eds.) Precarious Employment. Causes, Consequences and Remedies. Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing, 2017. 200 p.
  • Veredyuk O.V. Instability of Employment: Theoretical concept and assessment of its scale in Russia. Vestnik SPbGU. Ekonomika=St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 2013, no. 1, pp. 25–32 (in Russian).
  • Kuchenkova A.V., Kolosova E.A. Differentiation of workers by features of precarious employment. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, 2018, no. 3, pp. 288–305. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.3.15 (in Russian).
  • Popov A.V., Solov’eva T.S. Analyzing and classifying the implications of employment precarization: Individual, organizational and social levels. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2019, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 182–196. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.10 (in Russian).
  • Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V. Influence of precarious employment on household well-being. Sotsial no-trudovye issledovaniya=Social & Labour Research, 2020, no. 39(2), pp. 30–41. DOI: 10.34022/2658-3712-2020-39-2-30-41(in Russian).
  • Tikhonova N. Subjective stratification of Russian society model and its dynamic. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya=Sociological Research, 2018, no. 1–2 (126), pp. 17–29 (in Russian).
Статья научная