Main stages of social security system development

On the one hand, the reform should have positive features, since earlier effective norms are being improved, but, on the other hand, there are certain negative aspects: both theorists and practitioners often do not keep up with the change of legislation, and hence there are errors in practice.

The relevance of this research work lies in the fact that social security is one of the main directions of development of the beloved democratic state governed by the rule of law. It is the social security Institute that guarantees pensions and benefits to citizens, including when they achieve a certain growth.

In the late 60s, there were even more scientific discussions about the concept of this industry, ee objects, and methods of legal regulation. Currently, ee existence has become a reality. At a time when the Russian state system of social protection of the population is being re-formed, this outgrowth of the right takes on special significance. Ee norms serve as an indicator of the state's social policy. They are designed to respond in a timely and adequate manner to all social risks that are inevitably associated with the transition of countries to a market economy.

The General concept of social security is distributive by its economic nature. A fair share of the party's gross domestic product is distributed through social security systems. The mechanism of such distribution is suspended by the nature of economic relations that objectively dictate certain capabilities of social security financing [1].

During the Soviet period, poverty and unemployment were not recognized as official grounds for social support, and social insurance was only declared. The financing mechanism consisted in the fact that the state budget provided for matching expenditure items for pensions, allowances, etc. In the theory of Soviet social security law, satisfying EastEnders of financing were considered as a personal legal category "Funds for the disabled". Since then, such means have not co-existed. The situation has changed somewhat only with the introduction of the state pension Fund. This method of introducing the full ignored the possibility of cohabitation of pension provision with the proportions of insurance payments.

Thus, the state has become a guarantor of equality in poverty, providing old people, disabled people, families with children, although not a high, but stable level of social assistance and support. This contributed to the social homogeneity of society, prevented the stratification of the settlement by income level.

Until the process of forming the Federal social security system is completed, its norms will undergo constant transformation. At the same time, it remains an unmanageable truth that the norms of this branch of law are addressed to the entire population. In this regard, everyone, and the lawyer all the more necessary to know the legislation on social security. This makes it possible to take full advantage of social rights in a timely manner and, if necessary, to protect them competently [2].

Social security as a certain form of human life has specific historical types, since it is carried out within the framework of a particular socio-economic formation.

The maintenance of the elderly and disabled under the primitive communal system was carried out, most likely, by force of law. In the slave-owning society, there was no form of promise for slaves at the age or in case of disability, but pensions were introduced for veterans of military service in Ancient Greece; in the Ancient rhyme, service is rewarded with the inheritance of a land plot.

In the development of social security, another important stage will be highlighted, when the state and industrial social insurance of employees in the parties with market economies will be combined with the formation of national social security systems that cover all housing and guarantee social assistance outside of the payment of insurance premiums.

As a person develops to the heights of civilization and the formation of a civil society, the circle of those who, without violating its moral foundations, can claim social support without losing their ability to work, if they are deprived of the opportunity to have a contented level of prosperity for reasons and societies independent of What.

In addition, as evidenced by the description of the functioning of social security systems in industrialized countries, as economic growth and improved living standards (better housing, nutrition and health) transformeres and the grounds, with whom the associated risk of loss in the

Eastern livelihood. These grounds are called social risk. This list of ways to include those that are suspended by the nature of the economic relations prevailing in societies and which are related to the existing conditions of human life in social network organizations (unemployment, stratification of the settlement by income level, incompetence of a person to adapt to this alienation, etc.).

Thus, the trend of changing the role of the state itself in organizing the functioning of the social security system is clearly visible. Until almost the end of the 19th century, the concept of non-interference of the state in the regulation of alienations to ensure the livelihood of the elderly and disabled prevailed in the field of politics. Only the promise and mutual assistance were encouraged by the state and the ability to implement Bentham's legal theory of strong individualism, in which the "complete freedom of the individual" can be achieved only with sexual non-interference of the state in the part of each individual and in the level of his life. The efforts to consolidate the army of wage-earners and make them aware of their class interests increase the struggle of the workers for their rights, which forces the bourgeois States to take certain measures to prevent a social explosion. The word goes out, craves everything, o first social security laws. These were laws that required social insurance for workers. It is with the adoption of such laws that state social security systems appear. The state character of these systems is expressed in the fact that the organizational and legal capacities for implementing social security are legally fixed, which correspond to and change.