Administrative and procedural enforcement measures: some of the application issues

The administrative and procedural enforcement measures are the integrated system of enforcement measures used for collecting and preservation of evidence, for carrying out the necessary activities of the administrative case, for the execution of the decisions taken. They are the efficient means for removing the obstacles on the way toward the fullest, most thorough and objective case solution. In other words, the mentioned measures are very closely connected with the realization of the administrative liability institution, developing the necessary conditions for that. The special characteristic feature of the mentioned measures is a specific procedural order of their realization that provides for a mandatory issuing of the corresponding protocol. This allows to minimize the discretion element of the officials performing the administrative and jurisdiction activities. Among the mentioned measures, bringing a person to somewhere, administrative detention of the person and delivering are most frequently met. Bringing a person, i.e. the enforced accompanying of a private person, is performed for the purpose of issuing the protocol of the administrative offence, in case it cannot be issued at place where the offence happened and the protocol issue is mandatory. Administrative detention, i.e. a short restriction of liberty of a private person, can be applied in exceptional cases, when it is necessary to provide for the full and timely processing of the administrative offense case, or for the execution of the administrative offence case decision. With this, the detainees are placed into a specially protected room. Delivering is a forced bringing of the private person or of the truly authorized representative of a legal person prosecuted in accordance with the administrative offense case, or a legal representative of a child brought to an administrative liability, or a witness who deliberately ignore the invitation of the body or the official processing the case. The analysis of the current legislation shows the insufficient regulation of the number of questions arising in the process of the mentioned measures application; it needs to be improved.