The place and role of the terminology of the theory of operational search activities in the system of the terminological apparatus of the process of investigation and disclosure of crimes

With all the variety of publications in the scientific and educational literature in recent years, devoted to the issues of terminology in the criminal law sciences, the general system of the terminological apparatus of this field of knowledge has not been adequately developed. In particular, many controversial terminological issues that arise in the general terminological field for the criminal process, criminalistics, and the theory of operational-search activity have not been resolved. In accordance with this, the purpose of this work is an attempt to comprehend and justify the place and role of the terminology of the theory of operational-search activity in the system of the terminological apparatus of the process of investigating and solving crimes. Materials and methods: the normative base of the study was the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation, the legislation of the Russian Federation on operational-search activities, as well as the works of domestic and foreign researchers on the issues under study. When writing the article, the fundamental provisions of materialistic dialectics were used, as well as general and particular methods of scientific knowledge, including historical and comparative legal, logical and philosophical, generalizations, descriptions, and others. The theoretical and practical significance of this work is determined by the provisions and conclusions formulated in it, aimed at improving the terminological apparatus of the theory of operational-search activity, forensic science, criminal law sciences in general. The Results of the study: As a result of the study, the features of the relationship and mutual influence of the terminology of the theory of operational-search activity on the conceptual apparatus of forensic science and criminal procedure were identified and analyzed, the difficulties and problems in this general terminological system were identified. Fingdings and Conclusions: It is concluded that it is necessary to form a single terminological field of these sciences for uniformity in the interpretation of certain terms by all subjects of law enforcement.