Metagraph theory as a basis for modeling relevant media discourse
Автор: Gapanyuk Yu.
Журнал: Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 2: Языкознание @jvolsu-linguistics
Статья в выпуске: 5 т.23, 2024 года.
Бесплатный доступ
This article is devoted to modeling media discourse based on a combination of a complex graph model and a multidimensional model. Despite significant advances in the field of neural network text processing, the task of modeling text and media discourse remains relevant. Large language models cannot be considered as a reliable discourse model, due to the fact that they are susceptible to hallucinations, which are features of model training and are difficult to diagnose and eliminate in practice. The basic model within the framework of the proposed approach is an annotated metagraph model; the main element of this model is the metavertex. The presence of metavertices with their own attributes and connections with other vertices corresponds to the principle of emergence, that is, giving the concept a new quality, the irreducibility of the concept to the sum of its component parts. Metagraph agents are used to transform metagraphs. A multidimensional metagraph model is a combination of a classical multidimensional model and an annotated metagraph model and allows complex descriptions in the form of metagraphs to be stored in hypercube cells. The multidimensional metagraph model can naturally be considered as a model of text and media discourse. The main drawback of the current version of the proposed model is the lack of a semantic discourse check system. Designing this system is the main direction for the development of further research.
Media discourse, text processing, metagraph, metavertex, metaedge, metagraph agent, multidimensional metagraph model, hypercube
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149147494
IDR: 149147494 | DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2024.5.2
Список литературы Metagraph theory as a basis for modeling relevant media discourse
- Basu A., Blanning R.W., 2007. Metagraphs and Their Applications. Springer Science & Business Media. 173 p.
- Codd E.F., 1993. Providing OLAP (On-Line Analytical Processing) to User-Analysts: An IT Mandate. URL: http://www.arborsoft.com/papers/coddTOC.html
- Gapanyuk Y., 2019. Metagraph Approach to the Information-Analytical Systems Development. Actual Problems of System and Software Engineering (APSSE 2019). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2514, pp. 428-439.
- Gapanyuk Y., 2021. The Development of the Metagraph Data and Knowledge Model. Advances in Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing: Selected Contributions to the 10th International Conference on “Integrated Models and Soft Computing in Artificial Intelligence (IMSC-2021), pp. 1-7.
- Feng Z., 2023. Formal Models of Discourse Analysis. Formal Analysis for Natural Language Processing: A Handbook. Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 597-633.
- Hou S., Zhang S., Fei C., 2020. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Comprehensive Review of Theory, Parsing Methods and Applications. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 157, no. 113421.
- Khalil A., Belaissaoui M., 2022. A Graph-Oriented Framework for Online Analytical Processing. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 547-555. DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130564
- Liu L., Lin X., Joty S., Han S., Bing L., 2019. Hierarchical Pointer Net Parsing. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1908.11571
- Maziero E.G., Jorge M.L.D.R.C., Pardo T.A.S., 2014. Revisiting Cross-Document Structure Theory for Multi-Document Discourse Parsing. Information Processing & Management, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 297-314.
- Minaee S., Mikolov T., Nikzad N., Chenaghlu M., Socher R., Amatriain X., Gao J., 2024. Large Language Models: A Survey. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.06196
- Pilehvar M.T., Camacho-Collados J., 2020. Embeddings in Natural Language Processing: Theory and Advances in Vector Representations of Meaning. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, p. 175.
- Schuetz C.G., Bozzato L., Neumayr B., Schrefl M., Serafini L., 2021. Knowledge Graph OLAP. Semantic Web, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 649-683. DOI: 10.3233/SW-200419
- Webber B., Prasad R., Lee A., Joshi A., 2019. The Penn Discourse Treebank 3.0 Annotation Manual. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, p. 81. URL: https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/docs/LDC2019T05/PDTB3-Annotation-Manual.pdf
- Yao J.Y., Ning K.P., Liu Z.H., Ning M.N., Yuan L., 2023. LLM Lies: Hallucinations Are Not Bugs, but Features as Adversarial Examples. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.01469