Methodology for assessing scenarios of tourism industry development in Kamchatka krai on the basis of digital twin technology
Автор: Kuznetsov Mikhail E., Nikishova Mariya I.
Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en
Рубрика: Branch-wise economy
Статья в выпуске: 1 т.16, 2023 года.
Бесплатный доступ
In the rapidly changing conditions of the current technological paradigm new methodological approaches are required to assess effective management using modern digital tools (digital twins) that help to increase the quality and efficiency of economic processes to make timely and balanced management decisions. The purpose of the study is to develop a methodology for assessing scenarios for the development of the tourism industry in Kamchatka Krai on the basis of digital twin technology. Scientific novelty of the proposed methodology is the use of structural and situational dynamics methods with the involvement of data processing statistical methods in AnyLogic environment. The developed model is a modern digital tool that helps to convert a set of diverse data into a timely and balanced management decision based on an understanding of the current state of the industry and the prospects for its development. The theoretical significance lies in the scientific justification of the digital twin concepts and their application in simulation modeling in relation to the tourism industry. The practical significance is that the digital twin allows simulating different scenarios of Kamchatka Krai tourism industry development, thereby reducing the number of routine business processes and the influence of human factor on the quality of service. Using the assessment results, we have identified optimal scenarios for the development of the tourism industry in Kamchatka Krai, its bottlenecks, and determined that the introduction of scenario simulation modeling will regularly calculate the basis the tourist expenses and, consequently, the tourist industry income, and through multipliers - the regional budget income, and other integral indicators to improve the competitiveness of the tourism industry in the region. In contrast to the traditional analytics of processes based on tables and linear dependence, the developed digital twin makes it possible to observe the detailed behavior of the system in time, to keep track of tourist preferences and the capacity of tourist attraction points, to give recommendations on the placement of new objects. The obtained results can be used in the formation of proposals for the development of the tourism industry, and the monitoring of its condition and efficiency.
Tourism, tourism industry, digitalization, digital model, simulation modeling, digital twin, kamchatka krai
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147240249
IDR: 147240249 | DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.1.85.6
Список литературы Methodology for assessing scenarios of tourism industry development in Kamchatka krai on the basis of digital twin technology
- Akopov A.S. (2019). Komp’yuternoe modelirovanie [Computer Modeling]. Moscow: Yurait.
- Azrapkin A.I. (2022). Using simulation modeling for assessing socio-economic attractiveness. Informatsionnye sistemy i tekhnologii=Information Systems and Technologies, 2(130), 83–91 (in Russian).
- Belinha J., Jorge R., Dinis L. (2009). Analysis of 3D solids using the natural neighbour radial point interpolation method. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 44(1), 1–34. DOI:10.3970/cmes.2009.044.001
- Bolton R.N. et al. (2018). Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms. Journal of Service Management. 29(5), 776–808.
- Boschert S., Rosen R. (2016). Digital Twin – the simulation aspect. In: Hehenberger P., Bradley D. (Eds.). Mechatronic Futures.
- Coronado P.D.U., Lynn R., Louhichi W., Parto M., Wescoat E., Kurfess T. (2018). Part data integration in the Shop Floor Digital Twin: Mobile and cloud technologies to enable a manufacturing execution system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48, 25–33.
- Forrester J.W. (1958). Industrial dynamics: A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review, 36(4), 37–66.
- Glaessgen E., Stargel D. (2012). The Digital Twin Paradigm for future NASA and U.S. Air Force vehicles. In: AIAA/ASME/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
- Gorelova G.V. (2020). Statement the problem of simulation of decision-making processes in complex organizational-technical systems. Izvestiya YuFU. Tekhnicheskie nauki=Izvestiya SFedU. Engineering Sciences, (211), 134–144 (in Russian).
- Grieves M. (2005). Product lifecycle management: The new paradigm for enterprises. Int. J. Product Development, 2(1/2), 71–84.
- Grieves M. (2016). Origins of the Digital Twin Concept. Working Paper. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.26367.61609
- Grieves M., Vickers J. (2017). Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Kahlen F.J., Flumerfelt S., Alves A. (Eds). Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems. Cham: Springer.
- Hribernik K.A., Rabe L., Thoben K.D., Schumacher J. (2006). The product avatar as a product-instance-centric information management concept. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag., 1(4), 367.
- Katalevskii D.Yu., Suslov S.A. (2022). Simulation modeling in complex project management. Ploblemy teorii i practiki uptavlenia=International Journal of Management Theory and Practice, 2, 101–115 (in Russian).
- Kritzinger W., Karner M., Traar G., Henjes J., Sihn W. (2018). Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 51(11), 1016–1022.
- Lawson D., Marion G. (2008). An Introduction to Mathematical Modelling. Bioinformatics and Statistics Scotland Given. DOI:10.5860/choice.32-5134
- Lee J., Bagheri B., Kao H.A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23.
- Meadows D.H., Randers J., Meadows D.L. (2005). Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. London: Earthscan.
- Mittal S., Khan M.A., Romero D., Wuest T. (2019). Smart manufacturing: Characteristics, technologies and enabling factors. Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 233(5), 1342–1361. DOI: 10.1177/0954405417736547
- Molodetskaya S.F. (2020). Development of decision support methods under uncertainty. Voprosy upravleniya=Management Issues, 4(65), 102–114 (in Russian).
- Novysh B.V., Yurcha I.A. (2020). Simulation model for assessing the economic potential of regions. Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Innovatsii=Economics. Management. Innovations, 7(1), 88–94 (in Russian).
- Olenev N.N. (2008). Dinamicheskaya balansovaya model’ regional’noi ekonomiki. Materialy IV mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii “Innovatsionnoe razvitie i ekonomicheskii rost” [Dynamic Balance Model of Regional Economy. Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific Conference “Innovative Development and Economic Growth”]. Moscow: RUDN.
- Prokhorov A., Lysachev M. (2020). Tsifrovoi dvoinik. Analiz, trendy, mirovoi opyt [Digital Twin. Analysis, Trends, World Experience]. Moscow: AlyansPrint.
- Saddik A. (2018) Digital twins: The convergence of multimedia technologies. IEEE MultiMedia, 25(2), 87–92. DOI:10.1109/MMUL.2018.023121167
- Savostyanov D.A. (2021). Applying system dynamics to analyze the social and economic benefits of infrastructural projects. Vestnik SamGUPS, 1(51), 36–46 (in Russian).
- Shafto M., Conroy M., Doyle R. et al. (2010). Modeling, simulation, information technology and processing roadmap. Technology Area, 11. Available at: https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/501321main_TA11-MSITP-DRAFT-Nov2010-A1.pdf
- Shpak P.S., Sycheva E.G., Merinskaya E.E. (2020). The concept of digital twins as a modern trend of digital economy. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Ekonomika”=Herald of Omsk University. Series “Economics”, 1, 57–68 (in Russian).
- Sidorenko V.N. (1998). Sistemnaya dinamika [System Dynamics]. Moscow: MSU Faculty of Economics; TEIS.
- Söderberg R. et al. (2017). Toward a Digital Twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 137–140.
- Tao F. et al. (2018). Digital twin-driven product design framework. International Journal of Production Research, 57(1), 1–19. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2018.1443229