Microeconomic aspects of sustainable development – importance for market economy
Автор: Ivana Brkić, Mirela Tomaš-Simin
Журнал: Pravo - teorija i praksa @pravni-fakultet
Рубрика: Review paper
Статья в выпуске: 2 vol.39, 2022 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The subject of the paper is a connection between certain microeconomic aspects of importance for the functioning of modern organizations in the context of sustainable development. Modern companies must be open to modern ideas, they have to become competent in viewing different problems from different perspectives, become more flexible and sensitive to the market warnings and be ready to implement the changes in the process of management. Nowadays, in a situation of a big suspense, companies are facing with more complex goals, the evolution of work organization towards its self-government and the generation of flexible working forms, with an emphasis being put on the improvement of the employees’skills and the development of some new models such as a ‘career without borders’. Some research has found that when creating a model of the modern market economy, it is necessary to take into account almost all the details such as sustainable development, the development of knowledge and competences-based companies, giving employees the opportunity to build the companies by themselves using the temporary management and networking. In the process of development of a modern organization, there should be taken into account certain factors in the process of its functioning such as both internal and external requirements, the employees predispositions, in other words all the presumptions involved in the question of entrepreneurial activity. The aim of the paper is to present the selected microeconomic aspects of importance for the functioning and improvement of the work of organizations in turbulent market circumstances according to the sustainable development. The work is intended for all those who operate in a modern business environment, regardless of the form of the organization or a type of activity.
Microeconomic aspects/ sustainable development/ enterprise, market economy
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170202187
IDR: 170202187 | DOI: 10.5937/ptp2202080B
Текст научной статьи Microeconomic aspects of sustainable development – importance for market economy
2. Contemporary market economy model
The microeconomics studies different behaviors of individual economic entities depending on market conditions, in all market economy countries (Šagi & Šuvakov, 2004;
1. economy which is knowledge oriented,
2. development that is sustainable,
3. an organization that is sustainable,
4. networking,
5. social involvement and
6. management which is of a temporary character.
3. The concept of the knowledge economy
A knowledge-based approach is a key factor of the model of the market economy. The human capital and the innovation are the essence of this type of the economy, and they provide further the long term development (Welfe, 2009). Modern changes in the economic field, like forceful information flow, usage of information and communication tech, as well as the increased position of the overall knowledge, have lead to a concept called as stated above (Trzcielinski, 2015; Yeo & Lee, 2020). In modern economics this term is considered a trend. According to author Toffler, in the contemporary economy system, a key role is played by those terms: information and knowledge. These above mentioned innovations in economics are the consequences of the technological revolution that has imposed the interdependence of economics and science (Toffler 1997; Dworak, 2012).
-
1. Strategic indicators (customers, value offers, abilities, revenue, competition, offers, strategies, brands, stabilization, mission-vision);
-
2. Creation of the value (resources, assets, activities);
-
3. Value acquisitions (costs, profit, finance);
-
4. Network of value (customer relationships, suppliers, customer information, product and flows of the service).
As Kucznik (2019) pointed out, the knowledge-based economy consists of four pillars:
1. Environment: institutional and juridical – system of economic incentives through the financing of entrepreneurship and the removal of market barriers, primarily legal ones, than administrative and finally economic.
2. Systems of innovations: data per million inhabitants included the number of the employees in the Research and Development sector, number of scientific publications, number of technical solutions, number of technical patents.
3. Education, training, lifelong learning.
4. Per 100.000 inhabitants information infrastructure.
4. A review of the sustainable development
The concept of the economy based on knowledge can be more easily understood by pointing out the difference between industrial economy and knowledge economy, which are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Differences between industrial economy and knowledge economy.
Industrial economics |
Distinguishing criteria |
Knowledge economy |
Fast |
The changes |
Even faster |
Long |
Product life |
Short |
Large industrial companies |
Key driver of the economy |
Innovative companies |
Local |
Competition |
Global |
Stability |
Emphasise on |
Change Management |
Cheap raw materials and labor |
Competition advantage |
Quality, Innovation |
Financial capital vertically |
Rare resources |
Human Resources |
Vertically |
Making decissions |
Distributed |
Periodic, linear |
Process innovation |
Continious, systematic |
Internal processes |
Focus |
Entire value chain |
Pyramidal, bureaucrtic |
Organizational structure |
Network |
Vertically |
Leadership |
Empowering employees |
Diploma |
Education requirements |
Continious learning |
Confrotation, preassure |
Relationship managers and employees |
Cooperation, teamwork |
Cost |
Employees are viewed as |
investment |
Source: Drašković, 2010, pp. 84–85.
The creation of the idea itself was preceded by two basic elements of the idea of sustainable development: the term of the development and the term of the sustainability. As the author Sharplei said (2000), these two terms could be contradictory, because the both concepts having possible counterproductive effects, although some other economists said that there is no contradiction between these two terms (Lele, 1991). Various interpretations are given to the understanding of these two terms (Klarin, 2018). The four dimensions of sustainable development are shown in Figure 1. according to Spangenberg et al., 2002.
Figure 1 . The four dimensions of sustainable development.

5. Temporarily management – a new model of enterprise development
Although this term is more recent, there are a number of definitions and different versions. In order to audit some or all areas of business, the management is given to the elected manager for a certain period of time, in order to achieve the set of goals of the company (Dźwigoł, 2021). This definition is confirmed by some of the factors (Ritka, 2011):
-
1) removing barriers as well as market globalization are just some of the results of increasing competitive pressure;
-
2) the widespread use of data from the Internet has enabled consumers to have great influence and importance;
-
3) loss of economic security as a consequence of all possible risks (operational, financial, political and so on), causes increasing uncertainty in the business world;
-
4) in economic processes, the trend for innovation and flexibility has increased;
-
5) the growth of dynamic change, in the business environment.
Special achievements and characteristics should adorn the head of the company who is appointed temporarily to resolve issues and achieve the goals of the company (Vendt, 2011):
1) experience that enables already known methods of organization;
2) success in the profession;
3) reducing the risk of the different types of behavior as a result of a life situation which is stable;
4) when the expertise of the existing manager is not sufficient, the tentative manager is required to be prepared for various challenges;
5) readiness of the temporary manager for new tasks and goals, which should contribute to more efficient and effective implementation of the same tasks and goals;
6) satisfaction in achieving goals and achieving effects is the main driving force for a manager, not the fact that he gains power in that position.
6. Conclusion
Brkić J. Ivana
Fakultet za ekonomiju i inženjerski menadžment u Novom Sadu, Univerzitet Privredna akademija u Novom Sadu, Srbija
Tomaš-Simin Mirela
Poljoprivredni fakultet, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Srbija
MIKROEKONOMSKI ASPEKTI ODRŽIVOG RAZVOJA – ZNAČAJZA TRŽIŠNU EKONOMIJU
REZIME: Predmet rada predstavlja veza između pojedinih mikroekonomskih aspekata od značaja za funkcionisanje modernih organizacija u kontekstu održivog razvoja. Moderna preduzeća se moraju otvoriti za nova rešenja, naučiti sagledavati probleme iz različitih perspektiva, postati fleksibilnija i osetljivija na tržišne signale i biti voljna implementirati promene u procesu upravljanja. To je povezano sa činjenicom da se sada, u situaciji velike neizvesnosti, preduzeća više nego ikad suočavaju sa sve složenijim ciljevima, evolucijom organizacije rada ka njenoj autonomiji i stvaranjem fleksibilnih oblika rada i stavljanjem naglaska na poboljšanje veština zaposlenih kao i novih modela takozvanih karijera bez granica. Istraživanja su pokazala da je prilikom projektovanja savremenog modela tržišne ekonomije u neizvesnim vremenima potrebno uzeti u obzir aspekte kao što su održivi razvoj, izgradnja preduzeća na osnovu znanja i kompetencija, omogućavajući zaposlenima da zajedno stvaraju preduzeća, koristeći privremeno upravljanje i mrežnu saradnju. U procesu razvoja savremene organizacije treba uzeti u obzir određene faktore u procesu njenog funkcionisanja, odnosno unutrašnje i spoljne uslove, predispozicije zaposlenih, odnosno sve ono što čini preduzetničku aktivnost. Cilj rada jeste da se prikažu izabrani mikroekonomski aspekti od značaja za funkcionisanje i poboljšanje rada organizacija u turbulentnim tržišnim okolnostima. Rad je namenjen svima onima koji posluju u savremenom poslovnom ambijentu bez obzira na oblik organizacije i vrstu delatnosti.
Ključne reči : mikroekonomski aspekti, održivi razvoj, preduzeće, tržišna ekonomija.
Список литературы Microeconomic aspects of sustainable development – importance for market economy
- Adamczyk, J. (2017). Dyfuzja koncepcji zrównoważonego rozwoju i społecznej odpowiedzialności przedsiębiorstw. Marketing i Rynek, 24 (11), pp. 5–15
- Brkić, I., Brkanlić, S., Gardašević, J., & Vučurević, T. (2017). Savremene metode izvođenja nastave na predmetu Mikroekonomija [Modern teaching methods in the subject Microeconomics]. In: Katić, V. (ured.), XXIII skup Trendovi razvoja – Položaj Visokog obrazovanja i nauke u Srbiji [XIII Gathering Development trends – Position of Higher Education and Science in Serbia] (pp. 1–14) Novi Sad: Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Fakultet tehničkih nauka
- Cenamor, J., Sjödin, D. R., & Parida, V. (2017). Adopting a platform approach in servitization: Leveraging the value of digitalization. International Journal of Production Economics, 192, pp. 54–65
- Drašković, M. (2010). Znanje kao neograničen resurs i objekt upravljanja [Knowledge as an unlimited resource and object of managemen]. Montenegrin journal of Economics, 11 (6), pp. 83–90
- Dworak, E. (2012). Gospodarka oparta na wiedzy w Polsce: ocena, uwarunkowania, perspektywy. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
- Dźwigoł, H. (2021). The Uncertainty Factor in the Market Economic System: The Microeconomic Aspect of Sustainable Development. Virtual Economics, 4 (1), pp. 98–117
- Hardi, P. & Zdan, T. (1997). Assessing Sustainable Development: Principles in Practice. Winnipeg, Manitoba: International Institute for Sustainable Development
- Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2014). Digital ubiquity:: How connections, sensors, and data are revolutionizing business. Harvard business review, 92 (11), pp. 90–99
- Imran, M. (2018). Influence of industry 4.0 on the production and service sectors in Pakistan: Evidence from textile and logistics industries. Social Sciences, 7(12), pp. 246–267, https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7120246
- Kucznik, K. (2019). Gospodarka oparta na wiedzy jako trend stymulujący zarządzanie talentami. In: E. Gruszewska & M. Roszkowska (Eds.), Współczesne problemy ekonomiczne w badaniach młodych naukowców. T. 3. Analizy makro-i mezoekonomiczne, redakcja naukowa (pp. 134–149). Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
- Lele, S., M. (1991). Sustainable development: A Critical Review. World Development, 19 (6), pp. 607–621
- Lenka, S., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2017). Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value cocreation in servitizing frms. Psychology & marketing, 34 (1), pp. 92–100
- Lozano Platonoff, A., Sysko-Romańczuk, S., & Moszoro, M. (2004). Innowacyjność polskich frm w gospodarce opartej na wiedzy. Ekonomika i organizacja przedsiębiorstwa, (1), pp. 86–94
- Misztal, A. (2018). Zrównoważony rozwój polskich przedsiębiorstw – ewaluacja. Handel Wewnętrzny, 2 (373), pp. 27–40
- Nogalski, B., & Rutka, R. (2007). Kluczowe kwestie współczesnego rozwoju nauk o zarządzaniu w Polsce. Współczesne kierunki nauk o zarządzaniu. Księga jubileuszowa z okazji, pp. 37–66
- Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015). How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard business review, 93 (10), pp. 96–114
- Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9 (1), pp. 54–89
- Šagi, A., & Šuvakov, T. (2004). Mikroekonomija [Microeconomics]. Subotica: Ekonomski fakultet
- Shafer, S. M., Smith, H. J., & Linder, J. C. (2005). The power of business models. Business horizons, 48 (3), pp. 199–207
- Sharpley, R. (2000). Tourism and Sustainable Development: Exploring the Theoretical Divide. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 8 (1), pp. 1–19
- Spangenberg, J. H., Pfahl, S., & Deller, K. (2002). Towards indicators for institutional sustainability: lessons from an analysis of Agenda 21. Ecological indicators, 2 (1-2), pp. 61–77
- Tkachenko, V., Kwilinski, A., Klymchuk, M., & Tkachenko, I. (2019). The economic-mathematical development of buildings construction model optimization on the basis of digital economy. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 27 (2), pp. 119–123, DOI:10.1515/mspe-2019-0020
- Tofer, A. (1997). Trzecia fala, tłum. E. Woydyłło. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy
- Tomislav, K. (2018). The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the contemporary issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 21(1), pp. 67–94
- Trivić, N., & Šagi, A. (2004). Mikroekonomija – primeri za vežbu. [Microeconomics – examples of exercise]. Subotica: Ekonomski fakultet
- Trzcielinski, S. (2015). The influence of knowledge based economy on agility of enterprise. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, pp. 6615–6623
- Waschneck, B., Altenmüller, T., Bauernhansl, T., & Kyek, A. (2016). Production Scheduling in Complex Job Shops from an Industry 4.0 Perspective: A Review and Challenges in the Semiconductor Industry. In: SAMI@ iKNOW, (pp. 1–12). Graz: Austria
- Welfe, W. (Ed.). (2009). Makroekonometryczny model gospodarki opartej na wiedzy. Lódź, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
- Yeo, Y., & Lee, J. D. (2020). Revitalizing the race between technology and education: Investigating the growth strategy for the knowledge-based economy based on a CGE analysis. Technology in Society, 62 (c). DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101295