Mobile Computing Trends in Saudi Arabia: An Exploratory Study

Автор: Mutlaq B. Alotaibi

Журнал: International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science(IJITCS) @ijitcs

Статья в выпуске: 1 Vol. 7, 2015 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The main purpose of this research was to gain an understanding of the adoption behavior of mobile computing in Saudi Arabia. In particular, it aimed to acquire new insight into mobile computing trends, specifically in Saudi Arabia, in order to develop hypotheses and formulate precise criteria for mobile computing evaluation. In order to achieve these aims, the researcher created a focus group by recruiting eight participants with solid background knowledge of usability engineering and mobile computing. The focus group proposed a four-phase process: determination, qualification, categorization and evaluation of the mobile computing applications developed by Saudi organizations. During the determination phase, two hundred and twenty seven (n=227) mobile applications were determined as having been developed by organizations in Saudi Arabia. During the qualification phase, one hundred and forty two (n=142) mobile applications were qualified. Within the categorization phase, the experts categorized only the qualified applications into a two-level categorization hierarchy. Finally, in the evaluation phase, the qualified applications were evaluated in terms of purpose, platform, visual appearance, content, organization and usability. The results herein revealed that 43% of the mobile applications in Saudi Arabia were M-Government applications, while 57% were M-Business applications. In addition, the study proposed a sample of thirty six (n=36) applications as having statistical significance from all of the mobile applications in Saudi Arabia.

Еще

Mobile Computing, Saudi Arabia, Exploratory, Mobile Business, Mobile Government

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15012218

IDR: 15012218

Текст научной статьи Mobile Computing Trends in Saudi Arabia: An Exploratory Study

Published Online December 2014 in MECS DOI: 10.5815/ijitcs.2015.01.03

  • I.    Introduction

    Mobile computing is a rapidly growing market. To illustrate, the annual number of smart phones shipped to consumers is greater than the combined sales of automobiles and personal computers [1]. In Saudi Arabia, the number of mobile phone subscriptions reached 53 million in 2013, representing a population penetration rate of 181.6% [2]. In fact, the widespread adoption of mobile computing has motivated Saudi government and business organizations to deliver online services, through the use of smart phones; as a result, users are now able to install applications on their mobile operating systems which facilitates seamless and instant access to data anytime/anywhere [3]. Although the potential of mobile computing is well recognized, few studies have investigated the way in which these trends and key attributes have developed in Saudi Arabia; thus, a clear gap in the literature was identified.

This study attempts to overcome these gaps by exploring the status and trends of mobile computing in

Saudi Arabia. Consequently, this research will be of great interest to IT managers in Saudi Arabia, especially for those interested in migrating their business processes to mobile enterprise environments, or for those with specialist interests in mobile computing design and development. It will contribute to the literature on Information Systems (IS) by exploring dominant characteristics of mobile applications and by providing insight into key trends in mobile computing. As exploratory research is of broad focus in nature, it is important to clearly define the objectives. Therefore, the objectives of this study involved the formulating of hypotheses to direct further research in the field, by showing the differences between mobile computing types (M-Government and M-Business). Another objective involves proposing a sample of mobile applications in Saudi Arabia which are truly representative of the population, with statistical significance, in order to facilitate sample selection in future mobile computing studies. In addition, the study will provide a two-level categorization hierarchy of mobile applications in Saudi Arabia, along with application ranking and evaluation. As such, it is important to note that this paper is an extended version of an earlier conference paper [4].

The remainder of this paper will be organized as follows. The next, second, section will present a literature review on mobile computing, and an exploratory study will be presented in the third section. Section four will identify the results, section five will provide discussions as well as the implications of this research, and, finally, conclusions will be provided in section six.

  • II.    Literature Review

    The main concept behind mobile computing is that it provides the ability for users to access data and information remotely from portable devices, in an anywhere and anytime capacity, all of which have been aided by developments in wireless communications and technologies [5]. Sharma and Kasana (2010) argued that there are two types of mobility: terminal and personal mobility [6]. The former denotes the ability of a mobile unit to access information and data anywhere and anytime, while the latter refers to the ability of the user to establish a connection to access their desired services from any device which is supported by identification and authentication elements. With the rapid increase in network speed and capabilities, alongside the decreases

observed in mobile device prices, the use of mobile computing has become one of the most feasible and effective opportunities for many enterprises [7]. It is expected that computing for mobile workers will reach its peak of maturity and feasibility in the near future, this is fueled by the widespread adoption of new mobile applications as well as developments in the speed and coverage of wireless networks which have resulted in increased usability and user acceptance of mobile computing [8, 9].

Although mobile computing is regarded as an emerging trend in Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) research and practice, it has been developing for more than three decades. Kjeldskov (2013) argued that mobile computing evolves by means of six significant waves, including: portability, miniaturization, connectivity, convergence, divergence and apps [10]. The portability wave placed a significant technological focus on reducing the size of computers by producing portable and location-independent devices, such as laptop computers that are easily moveable from one location to another. The miniaturization wave focused on the facilitation of the use of smaller devices by mobile users, while the aim of the connectivity wave was to facilitate wireless communications between mobile users and their use of particular applications. The convergence wave targeted the integration of previously distinct technologies, which evolved alongside the use of stronger inter-connection and similar goals, such as cameras, music players and mobile phones. The divergence wave placed a greater focus on single functions, by producing gadgets that perform particular tasks. Most importantly, the apps wave focused on the software side by providing end-users with a wide variety of interactive functionality on their mobile devices, including E-mails, data access applications, games and specialized content. This emphasizes the importance of the current wave in mobile computing evolution, including the increased role that mobile applications play in improving user experience and facilitating mobile interaction design.

Mobile computing can be useful in several application areas. A common description of mobile application categories focuses on horizontal and vertical applications [11]. The former refers to standard types of applications that are usually offered within an operating system, such as E-mail, web browsing, to-do list and calendar functionalities, while the latter denotes the industry specific applications which have a transaction processing nature; specifically, they are usually connected to corporate databases and serve particular functionalities, such as retailing, sales and marketing. Categorized by the industry or sector, scholarly research suggested several application areas for mobile computing. For example, York and Pendharkar (2004) identified several mobile computing industries and application areas [12]. The application areas of mobile computing were ordered by the magnitude of research in each area; in particular: field services, sales forces, healthcare, field work, insurance claims and journalism, with a number of elephant articles in the field service industry and one article which identified the insurance claim and journalism industries [12]. Another suggestion of mobile application areas by Joshi (2014) included the areas of: news reporting, transportation and shipping, emergencies, business and education [11]. A recent study by Monares et al. (2011) investigated the use of mobile computing in emergency situations and found that by providing firefighters with a low-cost collaborative mobile application the control of emergency situations could be improved and it could even help to overcome several problems faced by firefighting units [13]. More recently, a study by Lawrence and Sankaranarayanan (2014) utilized mobile computing to facilitate the searching of hotels, it then presented the retrieved search results on mobile digital maps [14]. Another application of mobile computing was provided by Chong et al. (2014), specifically they presented a prototype of a mobile phone that performed the basic functions of a computer keyboard and mouse by utilizing wireless communications and a touch-pad [15].

As an emerging trend in the computing field, mobile technologies face several challenges with regard to different aspects. For example, a study by Mengshoe (2013) suggested that the current practice of mobile computing is concerned with four major challenges: robustness of the wireless networks, the effect of increasing demand on mobile service responsiveness, power management issues and the complexity of mobile application development environments [16]. Another example, by Joshi (2014), discussed the impact of network quality and usability in mobile computing environments [11]. In terms of mobile device constraints, the author listed: slow response time, low average throughput, poor coverage and rapid battery consumption, as issues. However, the recent advances in wireless networks, including fourth generation (4G) technologies, have resulted in wireless connectivity becoming simpler, more intelligent and more trustworthy. In the usability constraints, screen size and means of input were listed as posing challenges to mobile interaction design. Another concern, raised by Hammershoj et al. (2010), acknowledged the fact that mobile application development is reliant on heterogeneous platforms that are driven by different and competing companies – this can and has resulted in a lack of integration and interoperability [17]. This argument is in agreement with the work by Dehlinger and Dixon (2011) who presented on mobile application development challenges, including: mobile interaction design, context-awareness and the balance between agility and requirement engineering [18]. In summary, mobile computing environments face numerous challenging issues, including application integration, mobile interaction design, power management, resource allocation and the lack of contextawareness.

The increased research in mobile computing demonstrates that this field is of significant importance. Over the past years, several studies have investigated the evaluation of mobile applications by drawing different conclusions. For example, Po et al. (2004) addressed the issue of usability evaluation for mobile technologies using heuristic evaluation, they presented contextual influences to bridge the realism gap [19]. In particular, the study proposed that the usability evaluators should be considered when evaluating mobile applications in order to control the variation in the context interpretation. A study by Kjeldskov and Stage (2004) proposed six techniques for mobile computing evaluation in controlled environments with regard to physical activities; they found that movement and navigation, while using mobile applications, could cause several usability issues, like missing a button in the interface [20]. Another study by Zhang and Abidat (2005) proposed a generic framework for the usability testing of mobile applications according to the nature of the application; several challenges were identified with regard to mobile context, multimodality, connectivity, small screen size, different display resolutions, limited processing capabilities and power, and restrictive data entry methods [21]. In addition, Kaikkonen et al. (2005) examined the differences between usability studies of mobile applications in two environments: laboratory and field evaluations; they found that the same usability issues were identified in both environments [22].

More recently, a study by Verkasalo (2010), on the adoption of mobile computing, found that the motivation to use mobile applications depended on the application type, such as utilitarian motivations which drive the usage of mobile internet and map applications [3]. Franke and Weise (2011) proposed a framework of mobile computing quality assurance which provided key qualities of mobile applications, patterns of mobile applications development and metrics for mobile application testing [23]. A study by Alotaibi (2013) investigated the mobile service acceptance in Saudi Arabia, he found that Saudi Arabia was socially influenced in its adoption of mobile services [24]. The study assessed a mobile application in the financial services environment (entitled M-Tadawul), it revised the model of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). The results recommended further assessment of mobile applications in Saudi Arabia, because mobile applications have not, yet, been studied in depth in the country and no hypotheses have been formulated for best use. Another study by Anam et al. (2014) investigated the usability of adaptive mobile interfaces; specifically, they categorized interface elements and adapted web-based content in order to fit a tree-like mobile interface. The results of this usability study showed that this approach outperformed traditional mobile web interaction techniques [25].

  • III.    Exploratory Study

A research project is considered to be exploratory when the purpose of the study is centered around the discovery of new insight [26]. Although exploratory research is relevant to the IS literature, it should be approached with extreme caution [27]. The decision to conduct exploratory research involves a trade-off. To illustrate, on one hand, it is argued that the exploratory method is of great value for researchers, due to its potential contributions toward the generation of new theories [28]; although, on the other hand, exploratory studies might produce theories that lack both usefulness and validity [28]. Another argument by Cheon et al. (1993) suggested that the choice of research method is reliant on the maturity of the topic [27]. For example, exploratory methods can be useful in less mature contexts, due to their role in describing and establishing the basic understanding of a problem [27]. Armstrong (1970) demonstrated that extreme care is required when conducting exploratory research, due to its inductive nature – thus, the data precedes the theory [28]. One of the suggestions to overcome this obstacle is to reduce the extent to which the exploratory work leads to conclusions, by also drawing additional elements from prior theories [28]. Another useful suggestion places a remarkable focus on data reliability, by recommending data gathering techniques that rely on a panel of experts [28]. Another suggestion might involve increasing the flexibility of the research model, so as to provide opportunities for exploring different aspects of the context at hand [26]. In particular, the creation of a broad and flexible research model might rely on a survey of relevant literature, a survey of existing practices, expert consultations and an analysis of similar models [26].

Exploratory research is useful for the initial understanding of new phenomena, where the focus is broad and key issues have not, as yet, been identified [26]. One of the tools for conducting exploratory research is focus groups, as they represent group judgments which are gathered over the integrated views and perceptions toward a concept [29]. In usability engineering, focus groups are used as a survey method to collect the user’s views and motivations to use a software [30]. In the focus group, the researcher usually acts as a facilitator whose responsibilities include initiating and monitoring the group meeting sessions [29]. The facilitator controls the interactions among the group members by processing session outcomes and by identifying conflicting viewpoints [29]. Sessions of focus groups can be tapped or videoed, if permission from all group members is granted [29].

There are several advantages and disadvantages to the use of focus groups; to illustrate, they are useful to generate novel ideas and they can clearly explain concepts [29], they can also improve the credibility of the research, as they eliminate biases which can occur in interviews [31]. It also improves survey result explorations and explanations, and they can contribute to the process of questionnaire design through the analysis of common experiences identified in the group discussions [32]. It is also considered to be cheap, less time consuming and quick and easy to be organized, compared to observation techniques [31]. On the other hand, the facilitator requires an extensive experience in discussion panel management in order to avoid common problems in the discussions [33]. Furthermore, several inter-personal issues can emerge, such as dominance of a group member or withdrawal of an inhibited group member because of the group’s dynamics [29]. In addition, group thinking problems could be encountered, as such there could be a tendency of individuals to satisfying other group members which could lead to them expressing views that may be incorrect [33].

This paper introduced an exploratory study of mobile computing trends in Saudi Arabia. In particular, it has identified particular aspects of mobile presence by exploring further explanations of, and about, the status and the current practice of mobile computing. In order to explore the mobile computing trends, a focus group of eight (n=8) mobile computing specialists was created. The focus group included four men and four women in order to control the effect of gender. The group was also representative of four different levels of skill and knowledge: bachelor students, master students, PhD candidates and mobile computing practitioners. For each knowledge level, there was one male and one female who were working independently. As recommended by Armstrong (1970) [28], this study placed a great deal of emphasis on data reliability by creating a focus group of experts, from mobile computing contexts, with different experience and knowledge levels. In addition, the current study followed the suggestion, by Kothari (2004), that the research model should be kept broad in order to facilitate further exploration and explanation opportunities [26].

Initially, to generate a starting point, a brainstorming technique helped to identify the requirements for the exploratory study. The focus group proposed a process of mobile computing assessment, which consisted of four main phases: determination, qualification, categorization and evaluation. The determination phase aimed to collect as many mobile computing practices as possible by searching application markets, such as App Store and Google Play. In the qualification phase, each mobile application was assessed, in turn, by the focus group in order to determine whether it qualified for further evaluation. The qualified applications were those developed by organizations; furthermore, any counterparts that had been developed by individuals were disqualified. In the categorization phase, the qualified mobile applications were categorized based on common attributes, such as sector, main activities, etc. This phase resulted in a two-level categorization hierarchy of the mobile applications. During the evaluation phase, the qualified applications were individually assessed by the focus group members. In brief, a four-phase process was followed to explore the level of adoption, trends and main attributes of mobile computing.

While implementing the proposed process the initial search of the application markets revealed thousands of irrelevant applications, which were retrieved during the determination phase. Therefore, the search for mobile applications in Saudi Arabia utilized official indexes provided by Saudi websites, such as the E-Government index [34], the Stock Market index [35] and the Ministry of Commerce index [36]. The focus group members searched all of the mobile application stores, they noticed that some of the applications appeared in the different stores under different names. The output of the determination phase identified a total of two hundred and twenty seven (n=227) mobile applications, all of which had been developed by organizations in Saudi Arabia. During the qualification phase, several applications were found to be: lower than the desired levels, duplicated versions or developed by individuals. The qualification phase identified a total of one hundred and forty two (n=142) mobile applications. Based on the sector, the categorization phase divided these applications into two types: M-Government and M-Business. Based on their main activities, the applications of each type (category) were then categorized into eight (n=8) sub-categories resulting in a total of sixteen sub-category (n=16). The output of the categorization phase resulted in a two-level categorization hierarchy, see Table 1, which demonstrates that the sub-categories were ranked based on the number of mobile applications in each one (N), and their percent.

Table 1. The categorization hierarchy with the sub-categories ranked based on the number of mobile applications in each one (N) and the percent

Category

Seq.

Sub-Category

Rank

Applications (N)

Percent (%)

M-Government

1

Ministries

10

7

4.9%

2

Education

8

9

6.3%

3

Authorities

11

4

2.8%

4

Health

12

4

2.8%

5

Corporations

15

3

2.1%

6

Other agencies

4

12

8.5%

7

Government services

5

11

7.7%

8

Government content

6

11

7.7%

M-Business

9

Banks and financial services

1

18

12.7%

10

Energy and utilities

16

3

2.1%

11

Retail and commerce

9

8

5.6%

12

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

13

4

2.8%

13

Media and publishing

3

16

11.3%

14

Other businesses

7

11

7.7%

15

Business content

2

17

12.0%

16

Business services

14

4

2.8%

Total

142

100%

The evaluation of these mobile applications utilized an instrument devised specifically for this study; this instrument considered the following three parts: purpose, platform and evaluation. As recommended by Kothari (2004), it is important to reduce the exploratory efforts in order to ensure conclusion reliability and validity. Several elements of which were derived from prior research [26]. For example, mobile services can be regarded as an evolution of online services [37]; thus, the purpose of deploying a mobile application is similar to that of a webbased system. Alotaibi and Alzahrani (2004) suggested some of reasons why an organization may have a web presence, such as for advertising purposes, for displaying content, or for facilitating transaction processing [38]. Consequently, in terms of the research instrument, the aim of the first part was to determine the purpose of the mobile application as being one of three multiple choice answers: advertising only, displaying content and transaction processing. In terms of the second part of the research instrument (mobile platform), Godwin-Jones (2008) argued that Apple devices running in iOS, and others using Andriod as an open source operating system, have a vital role to play in the future of mobile application development [39]. This argument is in agreement with the conclusions presented by Hall and Anderson (2009), Hammershoj et al. (2010) and Huang (2011), they all noted that the iOS and Android are among the most dominant operating systems in mobile computing environments [17, 40, 41]. The three major mobile platforms of iOS, Android and other OS were identified in the current literature as the platforms representing the most popular mobile operating systems. As per for the third part (mobile application evaluation), derived from the common website assessment measures, the measures in this study were tailored to fit the context of mobile presence [42, 43]. Visual appearance, content, organization and usability were found to be adequate for initial evaluation of mobile applications. Therefore, each member of the focus group was asked to independently rate the mobile application, in terms of its visual appearance, content, organization and usability, using a ten-point scale ranging from very weak (1) to excellent (10). Conflicting rating results were then resolved through the use of short meetings and discussion panels, all of which were supervised by the author. In summary, this study utilized an instrument comprised of three parts to quantitatively assess the mobile presence in Saudi Arabia. The evaluation of the mobile applications is displayed in Appendix A, along with the ranking results.

  • IV.    Results

Fig. 1 shows the mobile computing trends in Saudi Arabia, in terms of type, purpose, platform and evaluation. At a glance, it can be noticed that M-Business, content display and iOS were the most dominant trends with a service quality level that was more than 74% in terms of the application’s visual appearance, organization, usability and content. In terms of the type of mobile computing, it was found that Saudi businesses were more progressive in their mobile computing than the government, with a score of 57% for M-Business, which is 15% higher than that for M-Government. In terms of mobile computing adoption, it can be seen that all of the organizations, both public and private, utilized mobile computing to display content, compared to 44% of the organizations which utilized mobile computing for transaction processing and 17.6% for advertising only. With regard to platform trends, iOS was the most dominant OS in mobile computing, with 95.1% of the mobile applications running on iOS, compared to 59.9% running on Android and 17.6 running on other OS, such as Windows phone and Blackberry. In terms of the evaluation of the quality of mobile computing services, all of the evaluation factors were rated above 74%, which is a very good indicator of the mobile application’s usability and visual appearance as well as of its content and organization. The overall score for mobile computing was consistent with the scores for the four evaluation factors which reflected a balanced implementation of the mobile applications.

M-Business

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 57.0%

M-Government

Display content

Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllin 100.0%

Transaction processing

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 44.4%

Advertising only

E

iOS

llllllllllllllllllllllll 95.1%

Android

59.9%

Other OS

Visual appearance

76.9%

Organization

lllllllllllll 75.6%

Usability

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllll] 75.1%

Contents

Overall evaluation score

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 75.5%

Fig. 1. Mobile computing trends in Saudi Arabia, in terms of type, purpose, platform and evaluation

Fig. 2 shows the mean values of mobile computing characteristics, including platform (a), purpose (b), and evaluation (c), for both M-Government and M-Business. At a glance, it can be seen that the characteristics of mobile presence varied between M-Government and M-Business, with a particularly consistent difference in favor of M-Business in terms of the mobile presence evaluation factors. In Fig. 2 (a), it can be seen that iOS is the most dominant mobile platform, with a penetration rate of 98% and 92% for the M-Business and M-Government applications, respectively. In terms of Android penetration, the frequency values represent a different picture with the number of M-Government applications running on Android (67%) being higher than for M-Business (54%). This implies that M-Government is more reliant for open source mobile platforms when compared with M-Business. Nevertheless, Android was identified as the second dominant mobile platform in the Saudi market. To illustrate, 14% of the M-Business applications run on other platforms, such as Windows phone and Blackberry, compared to 7% for M-Government applications. In Fig. 2 (b), it is clear that display content forms a common purpose of mobile presence in Saudi organizations, with all the M-

Government and M-Business aiming to show their relevant contents to mobile users. The figure also showed that 22% of the M-Business organizations adopted mobile computing for advertising only, compared to 11% for M-Government. This implies that M-Government has taken the adoption of mobile computing more seriously than M-Business. This finding is also supported by the status of mobile applications being transaction-oriented, which compares favorably to M-Government. In particular, 61% of M-Government applications were identified to be transaction processing in nature, which represents almost double the transactional applications for M-Business (32%). In Fig. 2 (c), the results herein showed that M-Business was consistently of higher quality than M-Government with regard to all aspects of evaluation: visual appearance, contents, organization and usability. The value for M-Business was approximately 4% higher than that for M-Government. In summary, the results herein revealed a clear variance in the trends and characteristics of mobile presence, these differences were clearly observed in the adoption behavior of government and business organizations in Saudi Arabia.

Fig. 2. Mean values of mobile computing trend and characteristics, including platform (a), purpose (b) and evaluation (c) for both M-Government and M-Business.

  • V.    Discussion

The purpose of this research was to formulate hypotheses, it is therefore important to identify the elements of mobile computing which are more progressive. The number of applications in M-Business was higher than in M-Government, which implies that M-Business is more progressive. However, this indicator cannot be trusted alone, as there are more private organizations than government ones. Therefore, it is important to consider a representative sample of mobile computing applications. With the aid of data mining tools, labeled SPSS Clementine, a sample representing all of the mobile computing applications was generated using the K-Mean clustering approach. The aim was to identify the quality levels and a set of applications that could serve as a prototype of each quality cluster. This resulted in a sample of thirty six (n=36) mobile applications, which were equally representative of M-Government and M-Business. This sample is shown in Table 2. Differences between the sample and the population were examined using a t-test. The t-test results showed no significant differences between the sample and the population (t1134= 1.273, cv=1.960, p>0.05).

The sample was utilized to run several statistical tests for the different evaluation factors, in order to formulate hypotheses. The first t-test examined the differences between M-Business and M-Government. The t-test results showed that M-Business adoption was of higher quality than that for M-Government (t1134= 3.813, cv=1.960, p<0.001). The t-test results showed that M-Business was of higher quality than M-Government in terms of usability (t1134= 2.679, cv=1.960, p<0.001) and attractiveness (t1134= 3.422, cv=1.960, p<0.001). The t- test results also showed that the content in M-Business M-Government. Therefore, three hypotheses of mobile was richer (t1134= 3.856, cv=1.960, p<0.001) and more computing in Saudi Arabia were proposed: organized (t1134= 3.599, cv=1.960, p<0.001) than that in

Table 2. The sample of thirty six (n=36) mobile applications, which were equally representative of M-Government and M-Business.

Category

Seq.

Name

Rank

Score

Seq.

Name

Rank

Score

M-Government

1

Ministry of Commerce and Industry (MCI)

55

79.1%

19

King Fahad Medical City (KFMC)

47

80.3%

2

Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA)

30

83.1%

20

Saudi Post Corporation

121

63.4%

3

Ministry of Health (MOH)

15

89.1%

21

Saline Water Conversion Corporation (SWWCC)

23

85.3%

4

Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE)

98

72.8%

22

National Information Center (NIC) at MOI

78

75.3%

5

Ministry of Labor (MOL)

91

73.4%

23

Riyadh Chamber of Commerce and Industry

69

76.6%

6

King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM)

130

59.4%

24

Saudi Arabian Airlines (Saudia)

92

73.4%

7

Taibah University

110

69.4%

25

Saudi e-Government (Yesser)

12

90.0%

8

Saudi Food & Drug Authority (Saudi FDA)

111

68.4%

26

General Directorate of Civil Defense

65

77.5%

9

Saudi Arabian General investment Authority (SAGIA)

125

62.2%

27

Saudi Press Agency (SPA)

114

67.5%

M-Business

10

Al-Rajhi Bank

8

91.3%

28

Saudi Company for Hardware (SACO)

48

80.3%

11

Albilad Bank

42

81.3%

29

Mobily for Individuals

52

80.0%

12

Saudi Electricity Company (SEC)

22

85.6%

30

Saudi Telecom Company (STC)

2

96.3%

13

Saudi Automotive Services Co. (SASCO)

20

87.5%

31

al-jazirah newspaper

67

77.2%

14

E-Mall

142

40.0%

32

Al-Riyadh newspaper

24

85.3%

15

eXtra Stores

1

96.3%

33

Arab News

66

77.5%

16

Othaim Markets

40

81.6%

34

Aleqtesadiah newspaper

14

89.4%

17

Jarir Bookstore

138

52.5%

35

Al Tayyar Travel

135

58.1%

18

Panda

59

78.4%

36

Solidarity Saudi Takaful

88

74.1%

H1: M-Business is more progressive in mobile computing than M-Government.

H2: M-Business is more usable and attractive than M-Government.

H3: M-Business content is richer and more organized than M-Government.

One of the contradictory issues identified during the course of this research found M-Business to be more progressive than M-Government, despite the fact that mobile presence is not taken as seriously by private organizations. In fact, the number of mobile applications developed by business organizations was greater than those developed by government   organizations;

furthermore, the evaluations compared favorably to the M-Business presence. However, the purpose for M-Business was concerned more with advertising and several applications were non-transactional in nature. An in-depth analysis showed that a great deal of M-Business applications belonged to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) which adopted a mobile presence, but which lacked links with databases. Further investigation of these SMEs showed that their mobile applications were of a non-transactional nature, because the SMEs had no corporate databases; nonetheless, they still launched a mobile application. To illustrate, there was one case of a small food chain restaurant that launched its mobile application to show their menu to their customers; unfortunately, the restaurant had scattered databases which couldn’t be linked to the web or mobile channels. As a result, the current research excluded these SMEs and similar cases from the proposed sample for mobile computing applications, because they were not truly representative and could have led to misleading results and false conclusions.

This study has identified several implications that are of relevance to the theory and practice of mobile computing. For researchers, it provides insight into the similarities and differences between M-Government and M-Business practices in Saudi Arabia. It supports further studies in the mobile computing field by proposing a sample of mobile applications that represents the population with statistical significance. For practitioners, the study showed trends and general characteristics of mobile computing practice in Saudi Arabia. For example, it is noteworthy that the displaying of content was the most dominant purpose of mobile computing adoption, yet the evaluation of the content displayed was actually rated lower than other factors. It also revealed dominant mobile platforms, by explaining major mobile presence purposes and showing key evaluation factors, such as usability, organization, content and visual appearance. The experience gained from this study suggests that Saudi organizations should embrace the development of mobile computing by considering the general trends and key characteristics of mobility practices.

Further research in this area could progress in different directions, such as usability heuristic evaluation of mobile computing and user acceptance testing of mobile applications in both government and private businesses.

  • VI.    Conclusion

Recent advances in the theory and practice of IT indicate that mobility is an emerging trend in the computing field. This study investigated the major trends in mobile computing by providing insight into key characteristics and quality levels of mobile computing practices in Saudi Arabia. Based on a four-phase process, mobile applications developed by Saudi organizations both governmental and in private businesses were evaluated by a focus group of eight, all of which were experts in the fields of mobile computing and usability engineering. The output from this study included a two-level categorization hierarchy of mobile applications in Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, the study proposed a representative sample of the population of mobile applications in Saudi Arabia, this included equal numbers for M-Government and M-Business practices, with eighteen applications each. The study also formulated three hypotheses of the differences between M-Government and M-Business practices in Saudi Arabia, these hypotheses could be utilized to help direct further research in the mobile computing field. All of the mobile applications that were qualified to be part of this study were then ranked in order to demonstrate the variations between the different sectors. Finally, implications for research and practice were highlighted, along with directions for further research.

Appendix A. The Evaluated Mobile Applications

Table 3. The evaluated mobile applications ranked based on the overall evaluation score.

Category

#

Name

Sub-category

Rank

Score

M-Government

1

Ministry of Commerce and Industry

Ministries

55

79.1%

2

Ministry of Transport (MOT)

Ministries

58

78.4%

3

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Ministries

30

83.1%

4

Ministry of Health

Ministries

15

89.1%

5

Ministry of Higher Education

Ministries

98

72.8%

6

Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Endowments, Dawah and Guidance

Ministries

107

70.0%

7

Ministry of Labor (MOL)

Ministries

91

73.4%

8

Islamic University

Education

119

66.3%

9

King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM)

Education

130

59.4%

10

Princess Nora bint Abdul Rahman University

Education

109

69.4%

11

Qassim University

Education

103

71.3%

12

Taibah University

Education

110

69.4%

13

Jubail Industrial College

Education

117

66.9%

14

E-Learning Deanship at Imam University

Education

77

75.3%

15

Library at KFUPM

Education

79

75.0%

16

Female Teaching Center at KSU

Education

49

80.0%

17

Saudi Food & Drug Authority (Saudi FDA)

Authorities

111

68.4%

18

Saudi Commission for Tourism and Antiquities (SCTA)

Authorities

122

63.1%

19

Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority (SAGIA)

Authorities

125

62.2%

20

Saudi Professional League (SPL)

Authorities

50

80.0%

23

King Fahad Specialist Hospital (KFSH)

Health

123

62.5%

24

King Fahad Medical City (KFMC)

Health

47

80.3%

25

Saudi Physical Therapy Association (SPTA)

Health

81

75.0%

26

Emergency Call Center by MOH (call 937)

Health

41

81.3%

27

Technical and Vocational Training Corporation (TVTC)

Government corporation

129

61.3%

28

Saudi Post Corporation

Government corporation

121

63.4%

29

Saline Water Conversion Corporation (SWWCC)

Government corporation

23

85.3%

21

Holy Makkah Municipality

Other agencies

72

75.6%

22

Municipality of Eastern Region

Other agencies

80

75.0%

30

National Information Center (NIC) at MOI

Other agencies

78

75.3%

31

Riyadh Chamber of Commerce and Industry

Other agencies

69

76.6%

32

Saudi Arabian Airlines (Saudia)

Other agencies

92

73.4%

33

Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission in New Zealand

Other agencies

54

79.4%

34

Saudi E-Government (Yesser)

Other agencies

12

90.0%

35

General Directorate of Civil Defense

Other agencies

65

77.5%

36

Saudi TV Channel 1

Other agencies

140

43.8%

37

Quran Radio

Other agencies

33

82.5%

38

Real-Estate Development Found at Eastern Province

Other agencies

25

85.0%

39

Saudi Press Agency (SPA)

Other agencies

114

67.5%

40

Critical Locations Service by Riyadh municipality (Hather)

Government services

108

70.0%

41

Staff Services by KSU

Government services

93

73.1%

42

Student Services by KSU

Government services

126

61.9%

43

Postal Address Locator by Saudi Post

Government services

115

67.5%

44

Tourism Navigator by SCTA

Government services

34

82.5%

45

Geographic Notifications by Jeddah Municipality

Government services

94

73.1%

46

Riyadh Municipality Notifications

Government services

73

75.6%

47

Government Notifications (Ishaar) by MOI

Government services

86

74.4%

48

Water Notifications by Ministry of Water & Electricity

Government services

112

68.1%

49

Commercial Violation Notification Service by MCI

Government services

26

85.0%

50

Riyadh Map (Wsef) by Riyadh Municipality

Government services

70

76.3%

51

Calendar of Events by SCTA

Government services

104

71.3%

52

Electronic Directory by MOH

Government content

100

71.9%

53

Saudi School Curricula by MOE

Government content

68

76.9%

54

National Plan for CIT (Tahawul) by MCIT

Government content

82

75.0%

55

Saudi Shelter Guide by SCTA

Government content

71

76.3%

56

Saudi Laws by Bureau of Investigation and Prosecution (BIP)

Government content

101

71.9%

57

Riyadh Directory by Arriyadh Development Commission

Government content

83

75.0%

58

Jeddah Explorer to Licenses of Digs

Government content

120

63.8%

59

Riyadh Book Fair by Ministry of Culture and Information

Government content

95

73.1%

60

Index of Consumer Goods by MCI

Government content

99

72.5%

61

Indicators of Higher Education by MOHE

Government content

74

75.6%

M-Business

62

Al-Rajhi Bank

Banks & Financial Services

8

91.3%

63

National Commercial Bank (NCB)

Banks & Financial Services

21

85.6%

64

Albilad Bank

Banks & Financial Services

42

81.3%

65

Alinma Bank

Banks & Financial Services

6

92.2%

66

Arab National Bank (ANB)

Banks & Financial Services

3

93.4%

67

Banque Saudi Fransi

Banks & Financial Services

45

80.6%

68

Riyad Bank

Banks & Financial Services

16

88.8%

69

Saudi British Bank (SABB)

Banks & Financial Services

56

78.8%

70

Saudi Investment Bank (SAIB)

Banks & Financial Services

51

80.0%

71

Samba

Banks & Financial Services

4

92.5%

72

Saudi Hollandi Bank

Banks & Financial Services

10

90.6%

73

Aljazera Bank

Banks & Financial Services

9

91.3%

74

Saudi Fransi Capital

Banks & Financial Services

17

88.8%

75

Al Rajhi Capital

Banks & Financial Services

11

90.6%

76

Mobily Mubasher

Banks & Financial Services

27

85.0%

77

Samba Tadawul

Banks & Financial Services

28

85.0%

78

Saudi Hollandi Capital

Banks & Financial Services

31

83.1%

79

Tadawul

Banks & Financial Services

18

88.1%

80

Saudi Electricity Company (SEC)

Energy & Utilities

22

85.6%

81

Saudi Automotive Services Co. (SASCO)

Energy & Utilities

20

87.5%

82

Saudi Lighting Company

Energy & Utilities

131

59.4%

83

E-Mall

Retail & Commerce

142

40.0%

84

eXtra Stores

Retail & Commerce

1

96.3%

85

Othaim Markets

Retail & Commerce

40

81.6%

86

Jarir Bookstore

Retail & Commerce

138

52.5%

87

Obeikan Store

Retail & Commerce

96

73.1%

88

Panda

Retail & Commerce

59

78.4%

89

Saudi Company for Hardware (SACO)

Retail & Commerce

48

80.3%

90

Bin Dawood Markets

Retail & Commerce

134

58.1%

91

Mobily for Business

ICT

87

74.4%

92

Mobily for Individuals

ICT

52

80.0%

93

Saudi Telecom Company (STC)

ICT

2

96.3%

94

Zain

ICT

13

89.4%

95

Panorama FM

Media and Publishing

46

80.6%

96

Al Arabiya

Media and Publishing

5

92.5%

97

MBC FM

Media and Publishing

60

78.1%

98

MBC NOW

Media and Publishing

75

75.6%

99

al hayat Newspaper

Media and Publishing

37

81.9%

100

Alyaum Newspaper

Media and Publishing

43

81.3%

101

al-jazirah Newspaper

Media and Publishing

67

77.2%

102

Al-Riyadh Newspaper

Media and Publishing

24

85.3%

103

Arab News

Media and Publishing

66

77.5%

104

Arriyadiyah

Media and Publishing

89

73.8%

105

Sabq

Media and Publishing

29

83.8%

106

Saudi Gazette

Media and Publishing

61

78.1%

107

Aleqtesadiah Newspaper

Media and Publishing

14

89.4%

108

Hasa Newspaper

Media and Publishing

139

47.5%

109

Arriyadiyah Newspaper

Media and Publishing

57

78.8%

110

Alweeam Newspaper

Media and Publishing

84

75.0%

111

Al Tayyar Travel

Other businesses

135

58.1%

120

Mahd alburaq

Other businesses

141

43.1%

112

Aljomaih Automotive

Other businesses

132

58.8%

113

Solidarity Saudi Takaful

Other businesses

88

74.1%

114

Tawuniya

Other businesses

62

78.1%

115

Munch Bakery

Other businesses

124

62.5%

116

Alromansiah Restaurants

Other businesses

32

83.1%

117

Effat University

Other businesses

127

61.9%

118

SABIC

Other businesses

116

67.5%

119

Spring Rose

Other businesses

118

66.9%

121

Al-dawaa Pharmacy

Other businesses

53

80.0%

122

Islamic Development Bank Group Business Forum - THIQAH

Business content

128

61.9%

123

Abyat by STC

Business content

97

73.1%

124

Argaam

Business content

35

82.5%

125

Asrar STC

Business content

90

73.8%

126

Government Directory by Mobily

Business content

105

71.3%

127

Deeni Yaqini by STC

Business content

44

81.3%

128

Hajj Application by Mobily

Business content

63

78.1%

129

Donation by STC

Business content

113

68.1%

130

Saudi Green Building Forum

Business content

133

58.8%

131

Quality Forum by SEC

Business content

136

56.3%

132

Your Health

Business content

106

71.3%

133

Your Eye Health

Business content

137

54.4%

134

Iktissab by Othaim Markets

Business content

76

75.6%

135

Lamsa

Business content

36

82.5%

136

STC Library

Business content

19

88.1%

137

Alhilal Football Club by Mobily

Business content

64

78.1%

138

Dawri Plus by STC

Business content

7

91.9%

139

Aramco Job

Business services

102

71.9%

140

SABIC Materials Selector

Business services

38

81.9%

141

SABIC PP Finder

Business services

39

81.9%

142

Rassid by SEC

Business services

85

75.0%

Список литературы Mobile Computing Trends in Saudi Arabia: An Exploratory Study

  • I. Clarke, "Emerging value propositions for m-commerce," Journal of Business Strategies, vol. 18, pp. 133-148, 2001.
  • CITC, "Communications and Information Technology Commission (CITC) IT Annual Report 2012," [Online] http://www.citc.gov.sa/English/MediaCenter/Annualreport/Documents/PR_REP_008Eng.pdf, accessed on 10 January 2014,.
  • H. Verkasalo, C. López-Nicolás, F. J. Molina-Castillo, and H. Bouwman, "Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications," Telematics and Informatics, vol. 27, pp. 242-255, 2010.
  • M. B. Alotaibi, "Exploring Mobile Computing Trends in Saudi Arabia: An Initial Investigation of M-Government and M-Business," in The International Conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government Las Vegas, USA, 2014.
  • J. Pascoe, N. Ryan, and D. Morse, "Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments," ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 7, pp. 417-437, 2000.
  • S. D. Sharma and D. R. S. Kasana, "Mobile Database System: Role of Mobility on the Query Processing," International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, vol. 7, pp. 211-216, 2010.
  • L. M. Porn and K. Patrick, "Mobile computing acceptance grows as applications evolve," Healthcare financial management: journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, vol. 56, pp. 66-70, 2002.
  • F. Turisco, "Mobile computing is next technology frontier for healthcare providers," Healthcare financial management: journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, vol. 54, p. 78, 2000.
  • A. Barbash, "Mobile computing for ambulatory health care: points of convergence," The Journal of ambulatory care management, vol. 24, pp. 54-66, 2001.
  • J. Kjeldskov, "Mobile Computing," in The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2 ed, Soegaard Mads and Rikke Friis, Eds. Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation, 2013.
  • L. Joshi, "Impact of Mobile Computing for Users," International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, vol. 2, pp. 32-39, 2014.
  • J. York and P. C. Pendharkar, "Human-computer interaction issues for mobile computing in a variable work context," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 60, pp. 771-797, 2004.
  • A. Monares, S. F. Ochoa, J. A. Pino, V. Herskovic, J. Rodriguez-Covili, and A. Neyem, "Mobile computing in urban emergency situations: Improving the support to firefighters in the field," Expert systems with applications, vol. 38, pp. 1255-1267, 2011.
  • W. Lawrence and S. Sankaranarayanan, "Smart Agent Learning based Hotel Search System-Android Environment," International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, vol. 4, pp. 9-21, 2012.
  • S.-C. Chong, L.-Y. Chong, and S. B. Ajiroba, "A Mobile-Based Computer Controller via Android Technology," International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science, vol. 5, pp. 21-28, 2013.
  • O. J. Mengshoel, "Mobile Computing: Challenges and Opportunities for Autonomy and Feedback," in 8th International Workshop on Feedback Computing San Jose, USA, 2013.
  • A. Hammershoj, A. Sapuppo, and R. Tadayoni, "Challenges for mobile application development," in 14th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks (ICIN) Berlin, Germany: IEEE, 2010, pp. 1-8.
  • J. Dehlinger and J. Dixon, "Mobile application software engineering: Challenges and research directions," in Workshop on Mobile Software Engineering Los Angeles, USA, 2011.
  • S. Po, S. Howard, F. Vetere, and M. B. Skov, "Heuristic evaluation and mobile usability: Bridging the realism gap," in Mobile Human-Computer Interaction-MobileHCI 2004: Springer, 2004, pp. 49-60.
  • J. Kjeldskov and J. Stage, "New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 60, pp. 599-620, 2004.
  • D. Zhang and B. Adipat, "Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications," International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 18, pp. 293-308, 2005.
  • T. Kallio and A. Kaikkonen, "Usability testing of mobile applications: A comparison between laboratory and field testing," Journal of Usability studies, vol. 1, pp. 23-28, 2005.
  • D. Franke and C. Weise, "Providing a software quality framework for testing of mobile applications," in IEEE Fourth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST) Montreal, Canada: IEEE, 2011, pp. 431-434.
  • M. B. Alotaibi, "Determinants of Mobile Service Acceptance in Saudi Arabia: A Revised UTAUT Model," International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications (IJESMA), vol. 5, pp. 43-61, 2013.
  • R. Anam, C. K. Ho, and T. Y. Lim, "Tree Adapt: Web Content Adaptation for Mobile Devices," International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science, vol. 9, pp. 1-13, 2014.
  • C. R. Kothari, Research methodology: methods and techniques: New Age International, 2004.
  • M. J. Cheon, V. Groven, and R. Sabherwal, "The evolution of empirical research in IS: a study in IS maturity," Information & Management, vol. 24, pp. 107-119, 1993.
  • J. S. Armstrong, "How to Avoid Exploratory Research," Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 10, pp. 27-30, 1970.
  • J. Kitzinger, "Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups," BMJ: British medical journal, vol. 311, p. 299, 1995.
  • J. Kontio, L. Lehtola, and J. Bragge, "Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences," in International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering: IEEE, 2004, pp. 271-280.
  • D. W. Stewart, Focus groups: Theory and practice vol. 20: Sage, 2007.
  • K. O'Brien, "Improving survey questionnaires through focus groups," in Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. vol. 156, D. L. Morgan, Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc, 1993, pp. 105-117.
  • I. McLafferty, "Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy," Journal of advanced nursing, vol. 48, pp. 187-194, 2004.
  • E-Government, "Government Agencies Directory," National E-Government Portal, [Online] http://www.saudi.gov.sa/, accessed on 15 January 2014.
  • Tadawal, "Directory of Saudi Companies," Saudi Stock Market Exchange, [Online] http://www.tadawul.com.sa/, accessed on 15 January 2014.
  • MCI, "Index of Saudi Businesses," Ministry of Commerce and Industry, [Online] http://www.mci.gov.sa/, accessed on 15 January 2014.
  • Y. S. Wang, H. H. Lin, and P. Luarn, "Predicting consumer intention to use mobile service," Information systems journal, vol. 16, pp. 157-179, 2006.
  • M. B. Al-Otaibi and R. M. Al-Zahrani, "E-commerce adoption in Saudi Arabia: an evaluation of commercial organizatios' web sites," in International Conference on Information Technology in Asia (CITA) Malaysia, 2003.
  • U.-M. Pcs, "Emerging technologies mobile-computing trends: lighter, faster, smarter," About Language Learning & Technology, p. 3, 2008.
  • S. P. Hall and E. Anderson, "Operating systems for mobile computing," Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, vol. 25, pp. 64-71, 2009.
  • D. Huang, "Mobile cloud computing," in IEEE COMSOC Multimedia Communications Technical Committee (MMTC) E-Letter. vol. 6 Arizona, USA: IEEE, 2011, pp. 27-31.
  • T. S. Tullis and J. N. Stetson, "A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability," in Usability Professional Association Conference Minneapolis, USA, 2004, pp. 1-12.
  • J. Jeng, "Usability assessment of academic digital libraries: effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability," Libri, vol. 55, pp. 96-121, 2005.
Еще
Статья научная