Modern ecological framework of the city for the urban ecotourism development

Бесплатный доступ

The article studies the ecological framework as a spatial structure, the basis on which the formation of recreational areas for urban ecotourism occurs. The author determines the place and role of recreational areas in the structure of the ecological framework. The article shows importance of recreational areas in the ecological framework, studies the methodology for the design and composition of ecological frames and identifies their main functions. It was revealed that the design of territorial frame systems is carried out based on a comprehensive assessment of the ecotourism potential of the territory. The study of the natural potential of the region is important for determining the areal structures of the tourist and recreational framework of the territory, since urban ecological tourism has a clear focus on its use. The article substantiates the necessity of creating eco-frameworks in city areas, the main functions of which are not only the protection of natural territory, but the development of urban eco-tourism. An analysis of the definitions of the ecological framework presented by various authors was carried out. The advantages of ecological frameworks for recreational areas of the city are revealed.

Еще

Urban tourism, ecological framework, protected areas, green architecture, ecological networks, ecological tourism

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/140305438

IDR: 140305438   |   DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11400287

Список литературы Modern ecological framework of the city for the urban ecotourism development

  • Akmalova, A. (2011). Slovar'-spravochnik po sociologii. Uchebnoe izdanie [Dictionary-reference book on sociology. Educational edition]. Moscow: Dashkov & Co. (In Russ.).
  • Nikolskaya, E. Yu., Romanova, M. M., Pasko, O. V., Uspenskaya, M. E., & Saadulaeva, T. A. (2020). Formulation of development strategy for tourism and hospitality industry. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(3), 467–474.
  • Zhilenko, V. Y., Amirova, E. F., Lomakin, D. E., Smoktal, N. N., & Khamkhoeva, F. Y. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy and environment. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 12(5/53), 1236-1241. doi: 10.14505//jemt.v12.5(53).08.
  • Vladimirov, V. V. (1980). Aktual'nost' predposylki ekologicheskogo programmirovaniya v rajonnoj planirovke [The relevance of the prerequisites for environmental programming in regional planning]. Voprosy geografii [Geography questions], 113, 109-117. (In Russ.).
  • Evstratenko, A. V. (2021). Voprosy formirovaniya pozitivnoj gorodskoj identichnosti (na primere g. Gomelya) [Issues of forming a positive urban identity (using the example of Gomel)]. Arhitektura [Architecture]: Collection of scientific cities, 14, 75-81. (In Russ.).
  • Elizarov, A. V. (1998). Ekologicheskij karkas – strategiya stepnogo prirodopolzovaniya XXI veka [Ecological framework – strategy for steppe environmental management of the 21st century]. Stepnoj byulleten [Steppe Bulletin], 2-4, 11-13. (In Russ.).
  • Shubenkov, M. V., & Shubenkova, M. Yu. (2020). Biotehnosfernyj podhod k proektirovaniyu sovremennyh gradostroitelnyh sistem [Biotechnosphere approach to the design of modern urban planning systems]. Nauka, obrazovanie i eksperimentalinoe proektirovanie [Science, education and experimental design]: Abstracts of reports of the international scientific and practical conference of teaching staff, young scientists and students. Moscow: MARChI. (In Russ.).
  • Morozova, G. Yu., & Debelaya, I. D. (2018). Zelenaya infrastruktura kak faktor obespecheniya ustojchivogo razvitiya Habarovska [Green infrastructure as a factor in ensuring sustainable development of Khabarovsk]. Ekonomika regiona [Regional Economics], 14(2), 562-574. doi: 10.17059/2018-2-18. (In Russ.).
  • Sharygin, M. D., Nazarov, N. N., & Subbotina, T. V. (2007). Opornyj karkas ustojchivogo razvitiya regiona (teoreticheskij aspekt) [Supporting framework for sustainable development of the region (theoretical aspect)]. Geograficheskij vestnik [Geographical Bulletin], 1-2, 15-22. (In Russ.).
  • Nikitin, A. V., Mingazova, N. M., & Yupina, G. A. (2010). Problemy formirovaniya ekologo-prirodnogo karkasa urbanizirovannyh territorij (na primere g. Kazani) [Problems of ekological-natural skeleton formation of the urbanized territories (On the example of Kazan)]. Izvestiya KazGASU [News of the Kazan State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering], 2(14), 88-96. (In Russ.).
  • Nefedov, V. A. (2012). Gorodskoj landshaftnyj dizajn [Urban landscape design]. St. Petersburg: Lubavitch. (In Russ.).
  • Ponomarev, A. A., Baibakov, E. I., & Rubtsov, V. A. (2012). Ekologicheskij karkas: analiz ponyatij [Ecological framework: analysis of concepts]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya Estestvennye nauki [Scientific notes of Kazan University. Natural Science Series], 154(3), 228-238. (In Russ.).
  • Ashworth, G. J. (1992). Is There an Urban Tourism? Tourism Recreation Research, 17(2), 3-8. doi: 10.1080/02508281.1992.11014645.
  • Gianfredi, V., Buffoli, M., Rebecchi, A., Croc,i R., Oradini-Alacreu, A., Stirparo, G., Marino, A., Odone, A., Capolongo, S., & Signorelli, C. (2021). Association between Urban Greenspace and Health: A Systematic Review of Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5137. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105137.
  • Tsai, W.-L., Davis, A. J. S., & Jackson, L. E. (2019). Associations between types of greenery along neighborhood roads and weight status in different climates. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 104–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.011.
Еще
Статья научная